D.Phil. Archaeologist. Co-Editor Current Anthropology. Previously Editor European Journal of Archaeology. Educator. Tattoo Enthusiast. World Traveller. Accident Prone.
Catherine J. Frieman is an archaeologist and associate professor at the Australian National University. Her research investigates conservatism and innovation, and she is a specialist in material culture and technology. .. more
Reposted by John R. Hutchinson, Catherine J. Frieman
Reposted by Henry Farrell, Catherine J. Frieman
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman
Through Pictish case studies, discover a project which is restoring disabled people as participants in the social worlds of the past at this free hybrid event on 15 October: www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/history-in...
(note: as far as i can tell the reviewer quite liked the novel which makes it even more impressive)
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman
Reposted by Rosemary A. Joyce, Catherine J. Frieman
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman
Have you read the works by Steph Evelyn-Wright and me that use fictive narrative as a way of thinking? e.g. doi.org/10.5744/bi.2... 🏺🦴💀
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman
An inviting path leading towards the Elder Range.
Arkaba Hill Lookout, Flinders Ranges, South Australia.
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman
Maybe the most-celebrated art is something that is both crafted with excellence and resonates with the moment.
(To quote Brecht:
"In dark times
Will there also be singing?
Yes, there will be singing.
About the dark times.")
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman, Joanna Brück
We have early bird prices until 22 October 2026. Head over to our website to book your place now!
Register here: tag2026.square.site/registration
Reposted by Margot C. Finn, Catherine J. Frieman
Shorter: just read @agordonreed.bsky.social.
karinwulf.com/trove/the-fa...
25% of the UK TV industry lost their jobs in the last 4 years and we never hear a peep about it!
Some jobs are 'real jobs' I guess.
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman, Aidan O’Sullivan
doi.org/10.11141/ia....
#archaeology #method #storytelling #socialjustice #diversity #inclusion #narrative
Reposted by Shawn Graham, Catherine J. Frieman
https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.71.16
In this paper the authors address the urgent need for diversity in archaeology and propose storytelling as one of the […]
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman
Approaching 20 years of ongoing development on the web gis, and coming up 75 years on the Site Record File itself. From paper records and maps to punch cards to an excel index to updating in the field.
med.stanford.edu/news/all-new...
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman
med.stanford.edu/news/all-new...
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman
We pushed the NSW Government to deliver reforms our public universities urgently need. And we won.
Join NTEU today and help keep the pressure on our public institutions to honour these reforms: nteu.au/join
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman
Job applicants want you to read their applications. Students want you to read their writing. No one wants AI to do it.
That means you should write your own email, memos, and opeds. W abundant typos (ok that's jsut me).
Reposted by Catherine J. Frieman, Peter Gratton
![A screenshot of a Dartmouth student newspaper article that says:
In an email statement to The Dartmouth on Sept. 18, Schnell wrote that he uses artificial intelligence for “language refinement, copyediting, improving clarity and organization and making writing processes more efficient,” but “review[s] the final text and take[s] responsibility for its content.”
“I develop ideas and arguments, conduct the research, evaluate the evidence and sources, determine the structure, prepare drafts and decide what appears in the final text,” Schnell wrote. “I regard these technologies as assistive tools. They do not identify the problem, design the research project, guarantee the validity of research results, interpretations, citations, conclusions or substitute for my research, intellectual judgment or authorship.”
Schnell’s Sept. 18 email statement to The Dartmouth was itself “100% AI-written,” according to a Pangram test.
In a follow-up statement about the composition of the email, Schnell wrote that he “developed the substance and wrote a draft” of the email, then “used an Al tool to assist with language and clarity, taking on several suggestions (including reworded sentences), before reading it through, making minor changes and sending it to you with my signature.”](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:6qwm7vqf4crijpianmnshu74/bafkreiamyuiofs23bbwonquazeeadhh6rb4uccc7dh75ypjgnn466hhcnq)