Richard Moorhead
richardmoorhead.bsky.social
Richard Moorhead
@richardmoorhead.bsky.social

Law prof in UK, and Australia (Exeter and Monash). Blogs on lawyers https://lawyerwatch.wordpress.com/ and PO Scandal https://richardmoorhead.substack.com/
Horizon Compensation Advisory Board. Plastic Geordie.
OBE

Richard Moorhead is a Professor of Law and Professional Ethics at the University of Exeter. He leads a team working on the British Post Office scandal and that work led to Moorhead’s appointment to the Horizon Compensation Advisory Board. He is giving the 2024 Hamlyn Lectures on "Frail Professionalism: Lawyers’ ethics after the Post Office and other cases". .. more

Law 46%
Economics 22%
Pinned
Finally found my AI use case

In regular inter partes disputes I'd agree this sort of thing would be a good idea. Don't see a need here for it, the regulator is independent and contrary extraordinary circs shoukd be fine to have access

I don't see any sign iniquity was argued. Quite a high bar to meet, so suspect it was treated on basis it doesn't apply

Sorry, not sorry 🍻

I think so.

There's a letter from POL I think.

I get a huge swoosh of joy whenever I think of Demon Copperhead…

Reposted by David Burrows

Amersi case is not a fishing expedition

Limited waiver and for the Inquiry only.

Reposted by Richard Moorhead

One of the country’s most popular novelists writes what she calls socially engaged fiction. In Barbara Kingsolver’s new book, she considers the role of art—and who it’s for. www.newyorker.com/magazine/202...
What Barbara Kingsolver Believes the Novel Can Do
One of the country’s most popular novelists writes what she calls socially engaged fiction. In Barbara Kingsolver’s new book, she considers the role of art—and who it’s for.
www.newyorker.com

I agree with this. And the Gov should already have a plan.
The SRA may appeal - I can't comment on prospects because it's not my area.

but the Government shouldn't run the risk of having the solicitors' regulator unable to regulate the profession properly.

The Government should change the law.

This is an incredibly damaging judgment. Cases that will be affected include the PO Scandal investigations.
A new High Court judgment has blown a large hole in the regulation of the solicitors' profession.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority will now have great difficulty investigating SLAPP, and other cases where a client's solicitor harms other parties.

Reposted by Richard Moorhead

The SRA may appeal - I can't comment on prospects because it's not my area.

but the Government shouldn't run the risk of having the solicitors' regulator unable to regulate the profession properly.

The Government should change the law.

Reposted by Richard Moorhead

A new High Court judgment has blown a large hole in the regulation of the solicitors' profession.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority will now have great difficulty investigating SLAPP, and other cases where a client's solicitor harms other parties.

Reposted by Richard Moorhead

5. Spotlight on Corruption has previously covered the challenge, outlining why these powers are crucial for the effective regulation of the legal sector.

www.spotlightcorruption.org/legal-regula...
High Court set to rule on legal regulator’s investigatory powers
The High Court is set to rule on a defining challenge to the powers of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) after London libel firm Carter Ruck and British businessman Mohamed Amersi contested wh...
www.spotlightcorruption.org

Reposted by Richard Moorhead

1. The High Court has ruled against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) following a major challenge by Carter-Ruck and Mohamed Amersi to the regulator's investigative powers. 🧵