David Kaye
banner
davidakaye.bsky.social
David Kaye
@davidakaye.bsky.social

californian. human rights, free expression, tech, international law. uc irvine. fulbright. article 19. prior: UN special rapporteur, GNI chair.

edu coalition (dm for details)

go bears!

David Kaye is an American politician who served as the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression between August 2014 and July 2020, succeeded by Irene Khan. .. more

Law 28%
Political science 21%
Pinned
in september 2024 @ucirvinelaw.bsky.social hosted a symposium asking whether int'l law would survive (we toyed with 'thrive', too optimistic). the journal is out & i've been meaning to direct ppl to it & my foreword. escholarship.org/uc/jitcl & my foreword here: escholarship.org/uc/item/2jx4...

for this reason among many/many others i don't understand the times doing headlines like this

local vibe is national vibe

definitely, was thinking about this earlier today after reading amodei's recent thing
but perhaps the thing that most undermines his claim is a failure to acknowledge the basic inequity of AI development concentrated in the hands of a small number of people who are becoming unaccountably wealthy & further detached from the reality of how their tools impact human life.

alternatively, have a couple of espressos before heading to kol nidre

any plan to deal with AI 'safety' has to address the power infrastructure that sustains this now lawless industry. pacing doesn't cut it. maybe it's part of the solution. but it's nowhere close to being the answer.

but perhaps the thing that most undermines his claim is a failure to acknowledge the basic inequity of AI development concentrated in the hands of a small number of people who are becoming unaccountably wealthy & further detached from the reality of how their tools impact human life.

he can't seem to let go of a belief in some basic tradeoff that he thinks works *for* humanity. fine, but without standards, it's all just saying trust us with what the 'embedded evaluators' will evaluate.

the second is that, even in an essay that promotes constraints in the face of recursive self-improvement & identifies tech risks, he offers no real standards rooted in the rights people enjoy - to security, fundamental freedoms, etc. it's still deeply vague.

first is this persistent fiction that AI would somehow 'usher in a renaissance of democracy and freedom'. enough already with this nonsense, even if it's framed as a core initiating belief of his. all evidence points to the opposite rn.

i'm willing to take dario amodei at his word that he wants restraints on AI. and his proposals are not necessarily bad. but two things (inter alia) undermine his claim.
darioamodei.com/post/we-must...
Your ChatGPT chats are not private, and humans are reading them. Anthropic's Claude too.

More here: www.404media.co/inside-proje...

since there is a white house/silicon valley merge, who actually is suggesting he say these things? the guy is clearly nuts, but this doesn't come from his brain without prompting.
Trump: "The only control or 'guardrails' that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades!"

i have an invite for instinct, & there are aspects of it that are enticing, but it sure seems like a privacy/security nightmare
It’s All Fun and Games Until You Give AI Your Credit Card
AI personal assistants are now acting on people’s behalf in the real world—and all sorts of strange things are going wrong.
www.theatlantic.com
Trump: "The only control or 'guardrails' that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades!"

about a year ago, i said much the same to jim jordan with nigel farage sitting next to me, though @raskin.house.gov said all this best.
Europe’s Threat to American Speech and Innovation
judiciary.house.gov

this absolutely deserves top of the fold coverage and I’m glad to see the Times doing it, just as they could have at any time in the past 18 months.
@alondra.bsky.social is 100% correct to call me out here because she fought tooth and nail running OSTP and I just erased her with this post.

even if he is that guy, it's a v low bar, and until he actually imposes real restraint, he's much more a part of the problem than an agent of its solution.

which is why ultimately it is a power/oligarchy problem way more than a tech one (as always really). and why it’s good to see the data center pushback, which may really be the only form of public voice we have right now.

hard to imagine the companies on their own restraining esp the tech, no matter what amodei or others say. this is why we need governance, to solve such problems. instead we have powerful actors actually entwined with govt/wall st & making policy without real consideration of the public interest.

my main AI concern is it’s getting close to too late for regulation. we have multiple use technologies that have already been let loose in the world. ideally the companies would have done some form of corporate/human rights due diligence first, required by law, well before release. but nope.