David Slichter
davidslichter.bsky.social
David Slichter
@davidslichter.bsky.social
Labor econ, econometrics, econ of ed. Associate Prof at Binghamton. Fellow at IZA.

Website: https://sites.google.com/site/slichterdavid/
If you enjoy the idea of being employed, you might be interested in our Assistant Professor in Applied Microeconomics position:

www.aeaweb.org/joe/listing....

We're open to both advanced APs and fresh PhDs.
American Economic Association: JOE Listings - August 1, 2026 - January 31, 2027
www.aeaweb.org
September 23, 2026 at 7:42 PM
Reposted by David Slichter
September 23, 2026 at 3:58 PM
Reposted by David Slichter
It only took us 5 years, but I4R finally has a newsletter. 🎉

We’ll use it to share new studies, Replication Games, research, events, podcasts, and other updates from the Institute for Replication.

Subscribe here:
www.i4replication.org/newsletter
September 14, 2026 at 12:44 PM
Reposted by David Slichter
1st @aefpweb.bsky.social EdDev mtg of the academic year, this F Sep 11 11am US eastern! Presenters:

-Pepi Pandiloski, "Nation Formation in the Wild Wild East"
-Innocent Akampurira, "The Effect of School Feeding on Education Outcomes"

Contact me for Zoom link. Join group (free) at AEFP.

Plz RT!
September 8, 2026 at 4:32 PM
Reposted by David Slichter
Compared to "significant effects," null results lead citizens to:

--View study as less important
--Ask for less info
--Be less willing to share it
--Think journalists would be less likely to cover the study
--See the study as being lower quality & researchers as less competent (😬)
August 31, 2026 at 6:34 PM
Thanks to Greg Caetano for having me on his new podcast! Here's video.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DmP...
Are Academics Lawyers or Judges? | With David Slichter
YouTube video by It’s all chaotic! — Seeking Nuance
www.youtube.com
June 24, 2026 at 3:22 AM
Great paper that I teach in my Econ of Ed class. It's well-known that, while No Excuses charter schools are great for test scores, other charters aren't. But this paper shows that plenty of non-No Excuses charters with zero/negative test score impacts might nonetheless be great schools.
May 27, 2026 at 8:15 PM
Reposted by David Slichter
NEW: We connected school attendance value-added estimates (for 2022-23 through 2024-25) to statewide survey data on school-based attendance practices. Our goal was to identify effective attendance strategies (e.g., specific practices, organizational systems, staffing, leadership). What did we find?🧵
May 26, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Had a great time at the FLX Econ of Ed conference this year. Special shoutout to @mariabzhu.bsky.social for organizing, and specifically for having name tags where you can actually read people's names!
May 20, 2026 at 12:12 AM
For anyone who missed it, here are videos of the talks:
www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...
May 3, 2026 at 1:28 PM
Reposted by David Slichter
Before the credibility revolution, everything was incredible.
April 20, 2026 at 1:33 PM
Looking forward to the bunching conference tomorrow and Saturday! There will be explainer talks for people new to these methods. If you want to watch the talks remotely, there's a Zoom link on the program:
www.gregoriocaetano.net/resources/Bu...
www.gregoriocaetano.net
April 16, 2026 at 5:27 PM
Reposted by David Slichter
New preprint! We reanalyze 46 papers that use log-like specifications (ln(Z+1), inverse hyperbolic sine etc). We find widespread non-robustness, and we show through theory + simulation how these models drive spurious significance. 1/

doi.org/10.31222/osf...
March 16, 2026 at 11:06 PM
My personal rule for IVs is that, if there's really only one reason why Z and Y are correlated, then you should be able to tell me Z and Y, and I'd be able to figure out what X is without you telling me. (1/n)
February 13, 2026 at 6:14 PM
🚨 CALL FOR PAPERS 🚨
Research In Labor Economics (rle.iza.org) is planning a volume featuring critical analyses of applied economics research. We are soliciting up to ten new papers that rigorously review an applied microeconomics topic, area, or methodology. #econsky
Home | Research in Labor Economics
rle.iza.org
December 18, 2025 at 5:44 PM
One fun thing about forecasting is having a record of what you find surprising about a paper's results. My biggest surprise about this interesting new paper is that I figured subfield experts would know more than non-experts. But no, apparently they don't.
🚨 New working paper!

How well do people predict the results of studies?

@sdellavi.bsky.social and I leverage data from the first 100 studies to have been posted on the SSPP, containing 1,482 key questions, on which over 50,000 forecasts were placed. Some surprising results below.... 🧵👇
November 24, 2025 at 7:20 PM
Reposted by David Slichter
I am excited to be on the #EconSky job market. My #EconJMP on Nepal's 2002 abortion legalization finds weaker son-biased stopping, more prenatal sex selection (~1 in 75 girls missing), and longer breastfeeding for surviving girls, a clear quantity quality tradeoff.

Website: jijeebishabhattarai.com
November 17, 2025 at 7:52 PM
Reposted by David Slichter
I am excited to share that I am on the job market. My JMP explores how maternal work hours affect children's cognitive outcomes in India. By exploiting bunching designs, I find that work hours have a positive but small and statistically insignificant effect on children's cognition.
November 19, 2025 at 10:54 PM
Reposted by David Slichter
🚀 I’m excited to share that I’m on the #EconSky job market this year! In my #EconJMP, I study how teachers in Finnish upper secondary schools impact students’ socio-emotional skills – and the labor market returns of these effects! (🧵, 1/N)
November 18, 2025 at 9:48 AM
Reposted by David Slichter
I am excited to announce I am on the #EconSky Job Market! In my #EconJMP, I find that weighting a teacher's test-score impacts differently across students increases the predictive power of test-score value-added measures for a teacher's impact on high school graduation.

Website: casetatro.com
November 12, 2025 at 9:17 PM
Reposted by David Slichter
An economist reached out and asked where they might publish a review they'd written.

Here's my (certainly incomplete) list of 30+ journals where economists publish reviews. bit.ly/3QfaE6m

(Additions welcome with a specific review example!)
October 23, 2025 at 7:50 PM
Reposted by David Slichter
Darkly funny how a strong emphasis on unbiasedness via the credibility revolution plausibly ended up making the published literature more biased.
Wild how economists and political scientists worry so much about unbiased tests **in their papers** and yet basically ignore how their journals filter on significance. Given our noisy tests, the latter creates huge bias away from zero.
September 10, 2025 at 3:06 PM
My PhD student Case Tatro has made a very helpful guide to making specification curves in Stata:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTLm...

#EconSky #Econ
How to Make a Specification Curve in Stata (Step-by-Step Tutorial)
YouTube video by In Case of Econ Struggles
www.youtube.com
July 31, 2025 at 7:17 PM
Nhan Tran and I have a new IZA discussion paper entitled "Do Better Journals Publish Better Estimates?"
docs.iza.org/dp17960.pdf
docs.iza.org
June 16, 2025 at 11:42 AM