Tyrannid
banner
paranormalshitness.bsky.social
Tyrannid
@paranormalshitness.bsky.social
My claim to fame is I’m the anon who told Confirmed Russian Spy Scotch Tape Official, “As an aspiring hentai artist, fuck you”

Everything else you need to know about me is on my AO3

Freaks and Weirdos hmu
Pinned
Oh Roger we’re really in it now
Reposted by Tyrannid
There was a thermonuclear furnace where his heart should be, and it was burning through the firewalls of his Jedi training. He held the Force in the clench of a white-hot fist. He was half Sith already, and he didn't even know it.
September 21, 2026 at 12:52 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
They existed, and yet they did not. Formless and separate, and still one with the Force. Somehow, he felt Obi-Wan's hand on his shoulder, as real as it had been many times when Anakin was a lonely boy, when he was a brazen Padawan, when they stood as equals.
September 21, 2026 at 4:51 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
Periodic reminder that copyright law has, since the Statute of Anne, been primarily a form of industrial regulation for the creative industries. It has also largely been designed and drafted by the creative industries.
Watch these disputes: they're evidence of what we've warned about, that giving the copyright oligopolies a windfall from AI has little to do with helping actual creators. It's a gold-rush for big media and trickle-down economics for working artists. www.latimes.com/entertainme...
Why some musicians aren't happy about labels signing AI deals with platforms
Record labels that sued AI music companies are now licensing them. But payouts are undisclosed, lawsuits continue and musicians ask who benefits.
www.latimes.com
September 21, 2026 at 5:19 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
This genuinely made me laugh out loud today
September 21, 2026 at 1:58 AM
Reposted by Tyrannid
Maybe you'll stumble upon it

#meteion #ffxiv
September 12, 2026 at 2:15 AM
Reposted by Tyrannid
The sane package

Regulate uses and failures before regulating models.

Make the legally relevant event something observable
The first step to sane AI regulation is admitting the technology is real.

The second step is to ignore anyone who talks about x risk.
September 19, 2026 at 1:58 AM
Reposted by Tyrannid
the thing monolinguals don't understand is that it is literally impossible to accurately translate everything. all translations are fundamentally rewrites of the original author's work and you can either accept that or bust out Genki I and II and start studying
September 18, 2026 at 7:12 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
😔🤙
September 18, 2026 at 11:15 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
at this point, my entire AI take is: save your "alignment," what I want is accountability
So the model acted in pursuit of goals imposed on it, which spawned sub-goals: that is how agents work. But did OpenAI know how they work? If so, why deploy this in the way they did? Why build a system that *does this* at all? Perhaps to ask: why build a gun that can go off at random?
September 19, 2026 at 3:49 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
the material differences between guns and AI models are pretty clear, and the obvious precedent here seems to be animals: if you trained an animal to bite (or raised a wild animal) and kept it insufficiently secured, nobody thinks accountability stops with punishing the animal
September 19, 2026 at 3:51 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
this framework also illuminates the danger of the EA/rationalist community around AI: if the breeders of wild, dangerous animals also subscribe to a quasi-religious set of ethics/values that center agency on the wild animals, those animals are going to be more dangerous
September 19, 2026 at 3:54 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
If I may, I wrote up my take on this issue here, where I suggest that yes, we should look at what the animal did but *also* how they were trained. Both are important, both need to be asked, but there’s a radical form of intentionalism these days that insists we can only look at the dog.
To Make AI Rules, Policymakers Must Resist the Influence of ‘Radical Intentionalists’
In industry rhetoric, a radical intentionalist stance dominates any interpretation of model behavior, writes Eryk Salvaggio.
techpolicy.press
September 19, 2026 at 4:53 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
It's some real "when you expose a problem you pose a problem" stuff tbh. Trans people stating that they won't vote for transphobic candidates become identified with the problem of that candidate losing.
...Assumption #4 has been driving me batshit, yet no one seems to realize it: if you're worried trans ppl might potentially harm your Dem candidate's chances, then YOUR CANDIDATE MADE A BAD DECISION! so why not join us in trying to get them to reverse position? juliaserano.medium.com/on-democrats...
September 19, 2026 at 3:44 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
i feel like a lot of people are not good at "reading" the visual and symbolic content of images bc they were never taught to do it and don't know it's a skill you can have
September 19, 2026 at 11:17 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
i notice this a lot with people trying to spot ai art, where they're either going down a checklist that doesn't apply to the image they're looking at (or is outdated wrt the current abilities of ai image gen), or they associate certain visual qualities with ai that are not actually ai-specific
September 19, 2026 at 11:22 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
whereas if you know more about stylization, different mediums and types of process, the conditions/purposes art is produced for, and even just the history of an individual artist, you have a way better chance at telling the difference
September 19, 2026 at 11:24 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
one of the most reliable tells by far is just: does this image appear to be communicating? are the elements composed in a way that effectuates the communication of an idea, or are they just things Related To an idea juxtaposed together? but this requires a seemingly uncommon level of visual literacy
September 19, 2026 at 11:34 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
GRMA to The Telegraph for this weekends PR campaign. 🔥💚🤍🧡
September 20, 2026 at 9:23 AM
Reposted by Tyrannid
Americans: oh, look, a systemic issue. I will solve it individually
September 20, 2026 at 5:56 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
Every intro to sociology class I teach gets this image.
September 20, 2026 at 6:20 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
September 20, 2026 at 11:12 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
they make it so difficult to do a program while being a working adult in this fuckin economy
September 16, 2026 at 9:52 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
Trying to teach this spiral ham to go down the stairs like a slinky
April 20, 2025 at 3:27 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
“Hey, I’m Luke’s Uncle Owen, and I dress similarly to others here on Tatooine.”

“And I’m Luke’s Aunt Beru. I wear a jean jacket over a butterfly collar blouse and look like an extra from the Partridge Family.”
June 10, 2024 at 11:21 PM
Reposted by Tyrannid
Oxtails do make me feel this way
And the Woody Woodpecker transition and flow?? 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
www.instagram.com/reel/DdZWRq6...
September 18, 2026 at 8:19 PM