Ridhi Bandaru
banner
rbanda.bsky.social
Ridhi Bandaru
@rbanda.bsky.social
🧠🐒🤖📓
bendemonium.github.io
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
🤖🧠NEW PAPER🧠🤖

What is the relationship between neural networks & symbolic systems?

Based on evidence from mechanistic interpretability, we argue for a quasi-symbolic view of cognition: Neural nets implement symbols but only approximately

Link: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

1/n
October 14, 2026 at 2:21 PM
More incoming, watch this space
Key Finding 2: Context & Complexity Matter.

Adults consistently relied on hierarchical mechanisms. Children and non-human animals showed graded performance influenced by task demands, working memory, and stimulus type.
October 9, 2026 at 5:45 PM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
🧠 Is hierarchical reasoning uniquely human, or do we share this capacity across species and development?

Our new paper in Cognition, "Flexibility of hierarchical reasoning across age and species," explores how humans and non-humans flexibly deploy recursive strategies! 🧵👇

doi.org/10.1016/j.co...
October 7, 2026 at 9:05 PM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
All scientific field distinctions are ultimately socially defined categories. So the Transformers paper was an “NLP paper” not because it was about language modeling and MT, but because Vaswani went on to do grammatical inference algorithms for mRNA. That is real “NLP researcher“ behavior.
October 6, 2026 at 10:57 PM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
September 15, 2026 at 4:57 PM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
Complexity is ubiquitous in the world around us. But different stimuli are complex for different reasons. Does the mind nevertheless represent a ‘unified’ notion of complexity across domains?

In @nathumbehav.nature.com, @chazfirestone.bsky.social & I show the answer is: yes! osf.io/preprints/ps...
May 26, 2026 at 8:01 PM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
AI norms descend more from CS, physics, and maybe cog sci which are just ... not very friendly? Or at least the interdisciplinary fusion has to become unfriendly by dissolving individual field norms.
September 8, 2026 at 1:14 PM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
One side effect of all the drama is I've been learning about the norms of math academia, which are beautiful. Mathematicians are like pro athletes: They know they're lucky being paid to play around, so they have rules of fair play to keep it fun, accessible, and valuable to humans.
September 8, 2026 at 1:12 PM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
Hey @ericlipton.nytimes.com 👋

AI is not “evolving” on its own.

*People* are choosing how to build it. *People* are choosing how to train it. *People* are choosing how to run it.

Maybe the problem is that they are the *wrong people* to make these choices.
OpenAI’s top scientist, in a blog post on Sunday, warns that artificial intelligence is evolving so rapidly that it is becoming increasingly difficult for humans to understand and control it.

Here is the post:

openai.com/index/an-ali...

And a couple of small excerpts--clear warnings.
September 8, 2026 at 3:24 AM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
Thrilled to share my article—and cover!—for this month’s Trends in Cognitive Sciences: “The Cognitive Origins of Geometry.” From wandering in the world to triangles in the mind! 🔺 www.cell.com/trends/cogni...
September 4, 2026 at 1:28 PM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
🤖🧠NEW PAPER🧠🤖
(The result of an 8-year project!)

LLMs seem very different from symbolic systems. Yet LLMs excel in symbolic domains (e.g., language/code/math). How do they do it?

Our finding: LLM representations have implicit symbolic structure!

Link in thread ⬇️
1/n
September 1, 2026 at 7:21 PM
August 29, 2026 at 2:37 AM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
Are brains and artificial neural networks converging onto universal representations?

There is a seductive idea making the rounds in NeuroAI / machine learning: train systems well enough, and they all converge on the same representation of reality (i.e. a unique world model).

We have thoughts™

1/n
The Umwelt Representation Hypothesis: rethinking Universality
Recent studies reveal striking representational alignment between artificial neural networks (ANNs) and biological brains, leading to proposals that all sufficiently capable systems converge on univer...
www.cell.com
August 28, 2026 at 2:59 PM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
Excited about new work from my CCN keynote (38m): youtu.be/v3J-vJfxhOE?...

We often choose between Bayesian and neural net models of behavior. But what if there's a spectrum, and combining both makes better predictions? Introducing BBT w @akjagadish.bsky.social & Guangyuan

arxiv.org/abs/2608.22154
August 26, 2026 at 6:56 PM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
I've been unsettled lately when reading messages and papers. It feels like I'm dissociating. Everything seems a bit alien, even if it's completely human. I've had a realization:

When our simulations finally exited the Uncanny Valley, they brought the Uncanny with them.
Life on the Uncanny Precipice | Naomi Saphra
We were wrong about the Uncanny Valley.
nsaphra.net
August 9, 2026 at 6:02 PM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
we should do this for posting online
August 3, 2026 at 7:05 PM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
like us! No one is doing computer science and math with their naked brains. Pen & paper, math notation, computer language—these are our neurosymbolic add ons! @lampinen.bsky.social , @blaiseaguera.bsky.social , @kmahowald.bsky.social all get it. Not sure why this isn’t more obvious to folks
This is a very good point. It's an LLM-system, at this point, not a pure LLM, so theoretical critiques about what an LLM can or cannot do should not be taken to be predictions of what an LLM-plus-a-bunch-of-stuff can or cannot do.
We don't know what's under the hood, so it's possible they're doing less LLM-y stuff and more neurosymbolic or just symbolic types of training. But the point is the capabilities and the speed at which they're advancing. Whether they do it like a human only matters if you're a cognitive scientist.
August 2, 2026 at 3:48 AM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
What should we make of recent language model advancements in mathematics? In my new post, I reflect on long-standing cognitive debates about symbols and neural networks in light of this progress.
infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/symbols-ne...
Symbols, neural networks, and mathematical intelligence
Some reflections on connectionism and the basis of higher-level cognition
infinitefaculty.substack.com
July 27, 2026 at 10:55 PM
anyway, more from curiosity-driven research www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Bizarre CRISPR enzyme kills cancer cells by shredding their DNA
Early tests suggest the protein can be aimed at targets with tumour-causing mutations.
www.nature.com
July 26, 2026 at 4:59 AM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
hello CogSci 2026 people!

We (@adedhe.bsky.social @rbanda.bsky.social) are excited to virtually discuss and present a sneak peek at our ongoing work comparing 🐦‍⬛, 🖥️, 🐒, 🧒, and 🧓 (very casual about the sneak there). If this piques your curiosity, stop by!

Virtual Flash Talks 46-48 @ Rio CogSci Con
July 24, 2026 at 4:56 PM
That’s right!

Are LLMs just stochastic parrots doing linear pattern matching? How do they compare to natural intelligences that do hierarchical reasoning? 🧵🪡
hello CogSci 2026 people!

We (@adedhe.bsky.social @rbanda.bsky.social) are excited to virtually discuss and present a sneak peek at our ongoing work comparing 🐦‍⬛, 🖥️, 🐒, 🧒, and 🧓 (very casual about the sneak there). If this piques your curiosity, stop by!

Virtual Flash Talks 46-48 @ Rio CogSci Con
July 25, 2026 at 11:05 AM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
July 21, 2026 at 7:58 PM
Reposted by Ridhi Bandaru
“We humans tend to overestimate how special we are”
www.nytimes.com/2026/07/21/s...
Monkeys Understand Shapes in Almost the Same Way as Humans (Gift Article)
Our geometric intuition, long considered something that sets us apart, seems to be shared with other primates.
www.nytimes.com
July 21, 2026 at 8:01 PM