Graham Entwistle
banner
f-euphemism.bsky.social
Graham Entwistle
@f-euphemism.bsky.social
woodworker/designer, maker, tinkerer. Obsessed with motorbikes and math and generating half-baked theories to help explain the world to myself (half-baked because leave a little room for mystery)
I recall reading that the judge who released him from federal custody several weeks ago required him to report to Minnesota, knowing the state charges were seated there. I wondered at the time why nobody commented on it.
September 17, 2026 at 3:22 AM
I moved here from Baltimore and truly respect the professionalism of VPD. But there is only so much civic improvement to be had pumping all money into policing an already low crime rate city. It feels like mental illness to keep banging that gong. Pete Fry does not seem like the unstable one, Ken.
September 9, 2026 at 6:54 AM
I don’t know, but I’m down with it.
September 3, 2026 at 3:28 AM
Harmonize CSA with CE instead of UL. Make them earn it.
August 25, 2026 at 6:42 AM
kinda like the people who first mapped a given area probably struggled with getting from A to B.
August 10, 2026 at 4:10 PM
As a motorcyclist, I want this info to supplement my already sky-high defensive driving. Tesla FSD has struggled to see bikers, and I don't have a clear map of what FSD does to car behaviour. One day teal lights will inspire confidence, but not just yet.
August 8, 2026 at 6:29 PM
Even if he never looked in a mirror, he is surrounded all day by Mar-a-Lago face.
July 18, 2026 at 8:08 PM
the White House got a golden shower
July 5, 2026 at 12:15 AM
Tax by weight (offset damage to roads), insure by weight and height (weight causes more damage, height is more lethal), aggressively factor weight with speed for speeding tickets/fines (to reflect the escalating danger of those two things). Recurring bills instead of one-off taxes.
June 29, 2026 at 6:19 PM
The arguments put forth by Kagan and Breyer were thoughtful, temperate and pointed out lots of ways to take the least radical approach. Roberts and Alito responded with "but you just know the EPA libs are lying". And somehow also rich investors not party to the case could lose money.
April 18, 2026 at 10:42 PM
Hypocrisy is afoot here. 2016 Roberts says "agencies will face high hurdles when they seek to use novel interpretations of a 'long extant statute' to 'bring about an enormous and transformative expansion in [their] regulatory authority without clear Congressional authorization" 2026 Roberts: " ".
April 18, 2026 at 9:36 PM