At test, reward-predictive cues biased rule selection, promoting the rule associated with the predicted outcome. Silencing the orbitofrontal-to-secondary motor pathway disrupted this cue-guided *rule* selection. Critically the same manipulation spared cue-evoked *action* selection in PIT paradigm.
September 4, 2026 at 10:18 PM
At test, reward-predictive cues biased rule selection, promoting the rule associated with the predicted outcome. Silencing the orbitofrontal-to-secondary motor pathway disrupted this cue-guided *rule* selection. Critically the same manipulation spared cue-evoked *action* selection in PIT paradigm.
Rats learned two different rules for completing a 3-step action sequence (delayed nonmatch to sample or visual rule), with each rule leading to a distinct reward outcome. www.keiflinlab.com/instrumental...
Rats learned two different rules for completing a 3-step action sequence (delayed nonmatch to sample or visual rule), with each rule leading to a distinct reward outcome. www.keiflinlab.com/instrumental...
To bring this higher-order level of behavioral organization into the lab, we adapted the iconic Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer (PIT) paradigm and developed the Pavlovian-to-Rules-to-Instrumental Transfer (sPRInT).
September 4, 2026 at 10:18 PM
To bring this higher-order level of behavioral organization into the lab, we adapted the iconic Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer (PIT) paradigm and developed the Pavlovian-to-Rules-to-Instrumental Transfer (sPRInT).
But real-world reward pursuit is rarely a choice between isolated actions. Different goals often require different strategies -or higher-order rules- that organize multiple actions into a coordinated sequence.
But real-world reward pursuit is rarely a choice between isolated actions. Different goals often require different strategies -or higher-order rules- that organize multiple actions into a coordinated sequence.
At test, reward-predictive cues biased rule selection, promoting the rule associated with the predicted outcome. Silencing the orbitofrontal-to-secondary motor pathway disrupted this cue-guided *rule* selection. Critically the same manipulation spared cue-evoked *action* selection in PIT paradigm.
September 4, 2026 at 10:08 PM
At test, reward-predictive cues biased rule selection, promoting the rule associated with the predicted outcome. Silencing the orbitofrontal-to-secondary motor pathway disrupted this cue-guided *rule* selection. Critically the same manipulation spared cue-evoked *action* selection in PIT paradigm.
Rats learned two different rules for completing a 3-step action sequence (delayed nonmatch to sample or visual rule), with each rule leading to a distinct reward outcome. www.keiflinlab.com/instrumental...
Rats learned two different rules for completing a 3-step action sequence (delayed nonmatch to sample or visual rule), with each rule leading to a distinct reward outcome. www.keiflinlab.com/instrumental...
To bring this higher-order level of behavioral organization into the lab, we adapted the iconic Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer (PIT) paradigm and developed the Pavlovian-to-Rules-to-Instrumental Transfer (sPRInT).
September 4, 2026 at 10:08 PM
To bring this higher-order level of behavioral organization into the lab, we adapted the iconic Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer (PIT) paradigm and developed the Pavlovian-to-Rules-to-Instrumental Transfer (sPRInT).
But real-world reward pursuit is rarely a choice between isolated actions. Different goals often require different strategies -or higher-order rules- that organize multiple actions into a coordinated sequence.
But real-world reward pursuit is rarely a choice between isolated actions. Different goals often require different strategies -or higher-order rules- that organize multiple actions into a coordinated sequence.