He did something similar in February when he fired the Archivist of the US.
It's now three months later and counting, and he apparently has notified Congress of his reasons for doing so, as required by law. 🗃️
The president has the power of removal, but is required to notify Congress of his reasons, as @historians.org pointed out last week.
That notification does not appear to have yet taken place. 🗃️
He did something similar in February when he fired the Archivist of the US.
It's now three months later and counting, and he apparently has notified Congress of his reasons for doing so, as required by law. 🗃️
He comes very close to saying yes, claiming these violations are unquestionably impeachable:
newrepublic.com/article/1951...
He comes very close to saying yes, claiming these violations are unquestionably impeachable:
newrepublic.com/article/1951...
This is a remarkable description from Raskin of how Trump's various corrupt schemes all interlock with each other:
newrepublic.com/article/1951...
This is a remarkable description from Raskin of how Trump's various corrupt schemes all interlock with each other:
newrepublic.com/article/1951...
Kennedy “is steering this country into dangerous territory based on his own whims and invalidated beliefs.”
“He’s ventured far outside of his swim lane. It’s time to take him out of the pool.”
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Kennedy “is steering this country into dangerous territory based on his own whims and invalidated beliefs.”
“He’s ventured far outside of his swim lane. It’s time to take him out of the pool.”
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Why?
It seems that someone in his office doesn't understand 230.
Section 230 absolves social media companies from any responsibility. “That has got to end.”
Why?
It seems that someone in his office doesn't understand 230.