“Accurately reflecting the will of the voters”? “Reflective representation”?
The gaslighting is wild. Were you laughing as you wrote this, Guv?
“Accurately reflecting the will of the voters”? “Reflective representation”?
The gaslighting is wild. Were you laughing as you wrote this, Guv?
Here's how we're pushing back:
Here's how we're pushing back:
On the heels of a Supreme Court decision that eviscerated protections for voters of color, elected officials jumped at the chance to disenfranchise people — we won't allow it.
On the heels of a Supreme Court decision that eviscerated protections for voters of color, elected officials jumped at the chance to disenfranchise people — we won't allow it.
Governors can carve out majority-white districts… but the second it’s about creating a majority Black or Hispanic district, it’s illegal?
Let’s be honest about where this is headed, Black representation in the South gets wiped out.
Governors can carve out majority-white districts… but the second it’s about creating a majority Black or Hispanic district, it’s illegal?
Let’s be honest about where this is headed, Black representation in the South gets wiped out.
Don't forget to subscribe: www.dworkinsubstack.com/subscribe
Don't forget to subscribe: www.dworkinsubstack.com/subscribe
apple.news/AZW-FdauCQdC...
apple.news/AZW-FdauCQdC...
But the devil is in the details. How will the law deal with privacy, enforceability, overbreadth, legal challenges, and unintended harm? www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...
But the devil is in the details. How will the law deal with privacy, enforceability, overbreadth, legal challenges, and unintended harm? www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...