Experts warn, urge AI regulation

Scholar power: 44.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Harvey J. Miller	21%	50	44.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

1.6 h

1

44.5%

Ranking score

0.213

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Harvey J. Miller

@mobileharv.bsky.social

@jamellebouie.net draws appropriate parallels between AI in the 21st century and railroads in the 19th: “If A.I. promises to transform the entire society, then the entire society is entitled to have a say, even a decisive one, over the use, development and direction of the technology.”

Opinion | New Matrix, Meet the Old Matrix (Gift Article)

The railroads were once the octopus that A.I. is now.

www.nytimes.com

September 23, 2026 at 10:21 AM

by Jack Stilgoe

15%

Scholar power: 15.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Jack Stilgoe	9%	31	15.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

0.9 h

3

15.0%

Ranking score

0.159

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Jack Stilgoe

@jackstilgoe.bsky.social

For anyone feeling a bit overwhelmed by current AI discourse, have a listen to someone who knows what she’s talking about podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/g...

Lina Khan on the AI-Safety Panic

Podcast Episode · Galaxy Brain · 18 September · 35min

podcasts.apple.com

September 23, 2026 at 11:03 AM

by Karen Benjamin Guzzo

7%

Scholar power: 7.8%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Karen Benjamin Guzzo	5%	27	7.8%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

0.1 h

0

7.8%

Ranking score

0.087

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Karen Benjamin Guzzo

@karenguzzo.bsky.social

A full prof at UChicago…

One professor’s AI-assisted output: 200 papers and 14 books this year

An online platform removed 257 papers written or co-written by the University of Chicago’s Nicholas Polson after other academics raised questions.

wapo.st

September 23, 2026 at 11:51 AM

by Mark Coeckelbergh

24%

Scholar power: 24.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Mark Coeckelbergh	12%	47	24.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

5.1 h

7

24.7%

Ranking score

0.05

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Mark Coeckelbergh

@coeckelbergh.bsky.social

New article in Synthese!

With John Dorsch and Tillmann Vierkant

link.springer.com/article/10.1...

Does AI undermine democratic deliberation? How engagement algorithms hijack epistemic agency - Synthese

Does artificial intelligence (AI) threaten deliberative democracy? This paper argues that it does, not because it isolates citizens in simplistic “filter bubbles” understood as ideologically homogeneo...

link.springer.com

September 23, 2026 at 6:53 AM

by Marco Casassa Mont

53%

Scholar power: 53.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Marco Casassa Mont	40%	20	53.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

54.0%

16.6 h

1

53.7%

Ranking score

0.05

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Marco Casassa Mont

@marcocasassamont.bsky.social

Excellent and ambitious paper on 'AI-Assurance Ecosystems: Building the Infrastructure to Enable Confident Adoption of Safe AI' ...
institute.global/insights/tec... #Assurance #AI #Ecosystem

institute.global

September 22, 2026 at 7:22 PM

Reposted by Michael Zimmer, Philip Nel, Hilary J. Allen

13%

Scholar power: 13.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Michael Zimmer	22%	26	11.2%
🎓 Philip Nel	3%	19	1.3%
🎓 Hilary J. Allen	2%	8	0.6%
Total			13.1%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

23.0 h

145

13.1%

Ranking score

0.046

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Emily M. Bender

@emilymbender.bsky.social

From @timnitgebru.blacksky.app and me on what we should take from the 2026 summer of AI hype:

www.technologyreview.com/2026/09/22/1...

Don’t be fooled by this summer of AI hype

Breathless claims about AGI and new capabilities fall apart pretty quickly under scrutiny.

www.technologyreview.com

September 22, 2026 at 1:00 PM

Reposted by Steve Peers

4%

Scholar power: 4.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Steve Peers	9%	27	4.7%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

59.0%

6.8 h

28

4.7%

Ranking score

0.04

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

TheBossRoss 🧶

@thebossross.bsky.social

Many think that AI is safe to use for simple tasks that require no 'research'. Here's an example. A black-and-white photo. AI was asked to colour it. What can go wrong, right?

A black-and-white family photo. A Christmas scene, the family gathered, all generations, next to the tree.

A screenshot of the command. Ai was asked "recolour this image"

September 23, 2026 at 5:12 AM

Reposted by Brendan Nyhan, Markus W. Gehring, Georg Weizsäcker , and 1 more Brendan Nyhan, Markus W. Gehring, Georg Weizsäcker, Richard S.J. Tol

10%

Scholar power: 10.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Brendan Nyhan	11%	51	7.9%
🎓 Markus W. Gehring	5%	8	1.4%
🎓 Georg Weizsäcker	2%	21	0.9%
🎓 Richard S.J. Tol	0%	107	0.0%
Total			10.2%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

54.0%

20.9 h

25

10.2%

Ranking score

0.036

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Aaron Rupar

@atrupar.com

Trump: "The very same people who said we'll all be dead in 12 years because of global warming -- a name since reborn to climate change because the planet was cooling, not warming -- these are the same people that are now saying AI is going to kill us all, that robots are going to attack us."

September 22, 2026 at 3:06 PM

by Francis Fukuyama

28%

Scholar power: 28.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Francis Fukuyama	9%	110	28.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

18.6 h

4

28.3%

Ranking score

0.036

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Francis Fukuyama

@frankfukuyama.bsky.social

Why I Changed My Mind About AI Risk
open.substack.com/pub/persuasi...

Why I Changed My Mind About AI Risk

On accelerationists and doomers.

open.substack.com

September 22, 2026 at 5:24 PM

by Adrian Vickers

10%

Scholar power: 10.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Adrian Vickers	8%	20	10.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

2.6 h

1

10.7%

Ranking score

0.035

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Adrian Vickers

@avick.bsky.social

AI I reckon. Should we have a vote?

September 23, 2026 at 9:21 AM

by Robert B. Reich

7%

Scholar power: 7.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Robert B. Reich	4%	37	7.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

54.0%

20.2 h

221

7.3%

Ranking score

0.033

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Robert Reich

@rbreich.bsky.social

Keep your expectations low for this week’s visit of XI to the United States when it comes to AI regulation.

But be aware of how high are the stakes for humanity.

Here's what you should know. https://robertreich.substack.com/p/xi-and-the-dilemma-of-ai

September 22, 2026 at 3:48 PM

Reposted by Shannon Vallor

6%

Scholar power: 6.8%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Shannon Vallor	16%	18	6.8%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

17.4 h

864

6.8%

Ranking score

0.033

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

dr. rich traditions, JD

@helldude.bsky.social

it's weird that ai got too dangerous to keep advancing right around the time money got more expensive to borrow

September 22, 2026 at 6:37 PM

by Emily Grubert Reposted by Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò

3%

Scholar power: 3.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Emily Grubert	1%	24	1.5%
🎓 Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò	4%	18	1.7%
Total			3.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index + sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

10.7 h

27

3.2%

Ranking score

0.032

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Emily Grubert

@gruberte.bsky.social

I think I’ve underestimated how radical it is to be an “actually, we don’t need more data” guy in the age of AI

September 23, 2026 at 1:17 AM

by Timothy D. McBride

0%

Scholar power: 0.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Timothy D. McBride	0%	23	0.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

68.0%

8.2 h

4

0.0%

Ranking score

0.025

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Timothy McBride

@mcbridetd.bsky.social

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype idp.nature.com/authorize?re...

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

Nature examines whether the technology might spell the end for humans, and why AI companies are calling for a slowdown.

idp.nature.com

September 23, 2026 at 3:48 AM

by Paul Dorfman

1%

Scholar power: 1.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Paul Dorfman	2%	6	1.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

49.0%

2.1 h

2

1.5%

Ranking score

0.018

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Dr Paul Dorfman

@drpauldorfman.bsky.social

Death cult does its thing.
#AI #climate
www.scientificamerican.com/article/trum...

Trump rejects AI regulation, citing parallels with climate change, in U.N. address

The president also said artificial intelligence should be rebranded as “super intelligence”

www.scientificamerican.com

September 23, 2026 at 9:54 AM

by Henry Farrell

12%

Scholar power: 12.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Henry Farrell	7%	33	12.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

53.0%

20.9 h

21

12.1%

Ranking score

0.018

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Henry Farrell

@himself.bsky.social

www.programmablemutter.com/p/machine-go... what it says on the package

Machine god metaphors eat your brain

There are other ways of thinking about AI

www.programmablemutter.com

September 22, 2026 at 3:05 PM

by Ryan Calo

27%

Scholar power: 27.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Ryan Calo	18%	25	27.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

18.4 h

4

27.0%

Ranking score

0.016

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Ryan Calo

@rcalo.bsky.social

AI Leaders Are Standing On a Liability Landmine. Today's @wsj.com cites Veronica Paternolli and my paper on liability for agentic AI. www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-l...

AI Leaders Are Standing On a Liability Landmine

Plus, Anthropic delays its IPO, and AI agents have trust issues.

www.wsj.com

September 22, 2026 at 5:37 PM

by Margot C. Finn

6%

Scholar power: 6.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 38%, Philosophy 21%, Political science 17%, Sociology 12%, Psychology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Margot C. Finn	5%	17	6.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

5.4 h

4

6.2%

Ranking score

0.014

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Margot Finn

@eicathomefinn.bsky.social

'“While 77 per cent of respondents either somewhat or strongly supported the use of taxpayer money to fund research generally, such support dropped to 42 per cent for research that involved scientists’ use of AI at some stage of the scientific process,” the paper says.'

www.sciencedirect.com

September 23, 2026 at 6:38 AM