Lukemaan uudesta lajista ja afrotropiikille (p.l. Madagascar) uudesta alaheimosta!
Gå och läs om vår nya art (kanske två arter..) och hur lite underfamiljen setts i tropiken! 🧪
Lukemaan uudesta lajista ja afrotropiikille (p.l. Madagascar) uudesta alaheimosta!
Gå och läs om vår nya art (kanske två arter..) och hur lite underfamiljen setts i tropiken! 🧪
Euceros ibex, namngett av Österbottens Tidnings läsare, har nu formellt publicerats!
On taas uusi afrikkalainen laji meille syntynyt, nyt tuli Euceros ibex! 🧪
Euceros ibex, namngett av Österbottens Tidnings läsare, har nu formellt publicerats!
On taas uusi afrikkalainen laji meille syntynyt, nyt tuli Euceros ibex! 🧪
Full study: doi.org/10.3897/jhr....
Full study: doi.org/10.3897/jhr....
https://authorservices.wiley.com/api/pdf/fullArticle/16447955
(if this link does not work and you want a .pdf feel free to DM me)
https://authorservices.wiley.com/api/pdf/fullArticle/16447955
(if this link does not work and you want a .pdf feel free to DM me)
"Afrotropics on the wing: phylogenomics and historical biogeography of awl and policeman skippers"
[Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Coeliadinae]
by @EmmanuelTouss1 and...
"Afrotropics on the wing: phylogenomics and historical biogeography of awl and policeman skippers"
[Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Coeliadinae]
by @EmmanuelTouss1 and...
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
I suspect 99% of our (probably fiveish) readers won't be interested, but take a look if you want DNA barcodes of African eucerotine wasps!
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
I suspect 99% of our (probably fiveish) readers won't be interested, but take a look if you want DNA barcodes of African eucerotine wasps!
Preprint now online: there are Eucerotinae in mainland tropical Africa.
Ennakkoversio nyt netissä: laattasarviahmasia on trooppisessa mannerafrikassa.
doi.org/10.64898/202... 🧪
Preprint now online: there are Eucerotinae in mainland tropical Africa.
Ennakkoversio nyt netissä: laattasarviahmasia on trooppisessa mannerafrikassa.
doi.org/10.64898/202... 🧪
(I may be revealing our discovery to those in the know, but that's typical for the the "scientist" variant of the human species. 😎)
(I may be revealing our discovery to those in the know, but that's typical for the the "scientist" variant of the human species. 😎)
First observation ... from the Afrotropical mainland
or
First observation ... from the mainland Afrotropics
First observation ... from the Afrotropical mainland
or
First observation ... from the mainland Afrotropics
A genus earlier mainly known from tropical Asia and Australia, with just one African species. After our Ugandan collecting, there are now two.
In @zookeys.pensoft.net with @ilarisaaksjarvi.bsky.social, me, Emil, Kari, Simon.
A genus earlier mainly known from tropical Asia and Australia, with just one African species. After our Ugandan collecting, there are now two.
In @zookeys.pensoft.net with @ilarisaaksjarvi.bsky.social, me, Emil, Kari, Simon.
Unsurprising TBH: tropical biologists soon get a "yeah, whatevs" attitude to new species.
Unsurprising TBH: tropical biologists soon get a "yeah, whatevs" attitude to new species.
Because believe it or not, I've simplified it a lot.
End looong thread 🧪🧵
Because believe it or not, I've simplified it a lot.
End looong thread 🧪🧵
More species on the equator and Madagascar, less in southern Africa...
More species on the equator and Madagascar, less in southern Africa...
There we have it. After these "simple" steps, we have an estimate. There are 9206–15577 species in the Afrotropics...
There we have it. After these "simple" steps, we have an estimate. There are 9206–15577 species in the Afrotropics...
So do the obvious. (And alas, obviously insufficient)
If a genus has ever been seen in any Equatorial Afrotropical country, assume it's present everywhere in the Equatorial Afrotropics.
So do the obvious. (And alas, obviously insufficient)
If a genus has ever been seen in any Equatorial Afrotropical country, assume it's present everywhere in the Equatorial Afrotropics.
We still have a problem: the genera that have been revised are usually "easy" ones = not lots of species, and few* of them undescribed. So some maths to account for this bias.
* few ≈ 1/2 new to science, instead of 90%.. this is the Afrotropics after all.
We still have a problem: the genera that have been revised are usually "easy" ones = not lots of species, and few* of them undescribed. So some maths to account for this bias.
* few ≈ 1/2 new to science, instead of 90%.. this is the Afrotropics after all.
But first, divide the Afrotropics into five subrealms. And pick one country per subrealm. The number of species will be estimated for those.
Even that's going to be a challenge. As you'll soon see, we really don't have much data.
But first, divide the Afrotropics into five subrealms. And pick one country per subrealm. The number of species will be estimated for those.
Even that's going to be a challenge. As you'll soon see, we really don't have much data.