#Anonymization
Note the halfass anonymization
June 28, 2025 at 4:38 AM
zentai has all the inhuman-ness and anonymization i love in freak, while still being so soft and smooth and plush and comfy grrr grr gotta do more
September 23, 2026 at 3:28 AM
It was only a matter of time, but Canada has joined the censorship bandwagon with Bill S-209.

Sign the petition, call your MPs, raise hell.

www.change.org/p/stop-bill-...
Sign the Petition
Stop Bill S-209’s De-Anonymization of Every Canadian Adult
www.change.org
August 3, 2025 at 2:15 AM
Let's be fair here: the anonymized source was anonymized to make the article seem more credible, not to protect the source. That's a misuse of anonymization.

That should be against NYT policy.
July 4, 2025 at 5:58 AM
If you're ever giving a talk on how difficult it is to do data anonymization well, this is your lead slide.
Who could it be?
August 5, 2026 at 10:24 PM
pretty nice examples of how utterly meaningless the labs' promises about "anonymization of user data" are
uhhh. uhhhhhhh. uhhhhhhhhhhh.

hey, anthropic? you're not supposed to know this, you know? you've been very loudly bragging about how you're not supposed to know this.
September 10, 2026 at 8:12 PM
btw the de-anonymization of the internet is a concentrated effort initialized by Facebook for incendiary and monetary purposes.

Don't let yourself become a mule like this chode.
I’m open minded on real names. We should definitely ban “cartoon avatar coupled with cutesy or “funny” name and behaves like an absolute tool” though.
June 16, 2026 at 2:16 PM
I dont think internet "safety" people actually recognize what all the internet censorship and de-anonymization of the internet actually will mean until it directly affects them.

They are actually as stupid as pro-ICE people who didnt understand what mass deportations look like until . . .
March 11, 2026 at 3:43 PM
despite managing to break the trans-led de"anonymization" of Adrian Dittmann in a right-wing publication (which imho is fucking hilarious), i won't be publishing anything myself about that Spectator piece until its editor credits @crimew.gay and i for our work on that piece :)
January 4, 2025 at 6:19 PM
Hey, can you please sign this and spread it around for me?

That'd be really cool of you, thanks 😊 *wags*

chng.it/VcMQXQh6mh
Have you seen this petition yet?
Stop Bill S-209’s De-Anonymization of Every Canadian Adult
chng.it
August 4, 2025 at 1:42 PM
kind reviewer, guess what is lurking behind [several references omitted for anonymization purposes]
September 11, 2025 at 10:09 AM
Amateurs very consistently overestimate the amount of data that it takes to uniquely identify an individual.

Amateur anonymization is about as good as amateur cryptography.
December 10, 2025 at 6:29 PM
I'm sure there's enough PII in the actual prompt and responses that whatever de-anonymization they're doing is not nearly enough
September 14, 2026 at 5:06 PM
OF FUCKING COURSE IT WAS META. that's like the whole god damn conceit of facebook; de-anonymization, de-personalization, endless atrocities, and all for like advertising that im gonna block anyway.

can mark zuckerberg fucking boil already
March 13, 2026 at 3:51 PM
Anonymization
May 14, 2026 at 1:57 PM
What’s going to happen here is that crime will happen. And the people who are currently saying “end-to-end encryption is unsafe” will demand exceptions and de-anonymization tools “for real criminals” and it’ll be oh so easy to build.
June 27, 2025 at 9:03 PM
also also and finally of course: advertising industry is one of the most aggressive forces behind the nightmare that is data privacy invasions and de-anonymization of the internet because they want individually targeted and activity-tracking advertising etc, thwart them by any means necessary
August 12, 2026 at 5:47 AM
a bit off-topic, but I find changing the name but keeping the real Reddit username (I checked) a bit weird an approach to anonymization
May 7, 2025 at 1:31 PM
Pic from yesterday (with tasteful anonymization)
July 26, 2026 at 6:54 AM
Christmas Eve Drop:

Fed. judge quashes yet another attempt by Trump's DOJ to get the personal data of trans patients and former patients, and does so in sarcastic and angry fashion calling out the administration's ill-intent and lack of good faith.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
December 25, 2025 at 2:45 AM
This is an infinitely better idea than the de-anonymization of the Internet.
April 8, 2025 at 11:22 PM
Please anonymise your data before sharing ! At the @lmu-osc.bsky.social we promote responsible data sharing through data anonymisation, or the creation of synthetic data to share instead of sensitive data. Our self-paced tutorials:
lmu-osc.github.io/data-anonymi...
lmu-osc.github.io/synthetic-da...
September 9, 2026 at 11:44 AM
But tell me again how stripping PII is sufficient, we don't need proper anonymization
Great moments in redaction history.
October 18, 2025 at 5:56 AM
my understanding is a doj rule change designed to defeat anonymization technologies made it v easy to forum shop

sooo probably?
Kash Patel is an exceptionally dangerous pick I wonder if they will be able to find a judge to approve the kind of wiretaps they need to do criminal prosecutions. I think it’s more likely we see the FBI outright politicized.
December 1, 2024 at 12:57 AM
these foundling box programs are being designed to evade public accountability—to ensure total anonymization along the pipeline.

You want *literal* infant trafficking? This is how you get it. 🥚
Or, you know, somebody who doesn’t want you to keep that baby can dump it in there while you’re sleeping. It’s all anonymous.
December 22, 2025 at 11:31 PM