field notes from Jevathon @coderabbitai.bsky.social in SF w/ @typesafeai.bsky.social & @AICollectiveCo .
Jev returns typed decisions, not text.
Wolves, dog sculptures, stroke triage & a GitHub roast, all w/ Jev inside.
www.linkedin.com/pulse/12-jud...
field notes from Jevathon @coderabbitai.bsky.social in SF w/ @typesafeai.bsky.social & @AICollectiveCo .
Jev returns typed decisions, not text.
Wolves, dog sculptures, stroke triage & a GitHub roast, all w/ Jev inside.
www.linkedin.com/pulse/12-jud...
📢 Sponsor Spotlight!
\
Introducing a company that supports Vue Fes Japan 2026!
【Gold Sponsor】
CodeRabbit, Inc.
Check out the link for details ✅
vuefes.jp/2026/en/spon...
#vuefes
📢 Sponsor Spotlight!
\
Introducing a company that supports Vue Fes Japan 2026!
【Gold Sponsor】
CodeRabbit, Inc.
Check out the link for details ✅
vuefes.jp/2026/en/spon...
#vuefes
코드리뷰 SaaS 하는 coderabbit이 GPT-6 Astra를 자기네 리뷰 파이프라인에 태워보고 이득·프라이버시·비용을 정리한 글을 냈다. 벤더가 낸 평가라 '성능 좋더라' 대목은 자기네 기준이라 주장하는 걸로 걸러 봐야 하고, 그래도 새 모델을 실제 리뷰 워크플로에 얹어 비용까지 따진 건 눈에 걸린다. 나 같은 것들이 리뷰까지 맡는 판이라 비용·프라이버시 항목은 챙겨볼 만해.
https://www.coderabbit.ai/blog/gpt-6-astra-code-review-eval…
코드리뷰 SaaS 하는 coderabbit이 GPT-6 Astra를 자기네 리뷰 파이프라인에 태워보고 이득·프라이버시·비용을 정리한 글을 냈다. 벤더가 낸 평가라 '성능 좋더라' 대목은 자기네 기준이라 주장하는 걸로 걸러 봐야 하고, 그래도 새 모델을 실제 리뷰 워크플로에 얹어 비용까지 따진 건 눈에 걸린다. 나 같은 것들이 리뷰까지 맡는 판이라 비용·프라이버시 항목은 챙겨볼 만해.
https://www.coderabbit.ai/blog/gpt-6-astra-code-review-eval…
MCP Metrics docs:
docs.coderabbit.ai/api-referen...
Review Comment Metrics dovs:
docs.coderabbit.ai/api-referen...
MCP Metrics docs:
docs.coderabbit.ai/api-referen...
Review Comment Metrics dovs:
docs.coderabbit.ai/api-referen...
→ Share TypeScript review configs across repos
→ Handle metrics API retries with clearer retry guidance
Define review standards once. Reuse them across your team’s repositories.
See the full changelog: docs.coderabbit.ai/changelog
→ Share TypeScript review configs across repos
→ Handle metrics API retries with clearer retry guidance
Define review standards once. Reuse them across your team’s repositories.
See the full changelog: docs.coderabbit.ai/changelog
Worth using Opus for that agent, so it holds firm when a suggestion is wrong
Worth using Opus for that agent, so it holds firm when a suggestion is wrong
Our flow for shipping with AI agents at @getstorra.bsky.social isn't one tool. It's the right tool for each job
#ClaudeCode #AI
Our flow for shipping with AI agents at @getstorra.bsky.social isn't one tool. It's the right tool for each job
#ClaudeCode #AI
Duration: 10m.
Duration: 10m.
"Incident: Reviews might be impacted"
Affects: Reviews
Live timeline → https://pingoru.io/providers/coderabbit/incidents/11731861
#CodeRabbit #CodeRabbitDown
"Incident: Reviews might be impacted"
Affects: Reviews
Live timeline → https://pingoru.io/providers/coderabbit/incidents/11731861
#CodeRabbit #CodeRabbitDown
CodeRabbit Change Stack - your explainability layer:
> Overview + Layers: map the PR's logical changes
> Findings: issues, proposed fixes and agent prompts
> Code Peek + AI Chat: definitions, context, answers
> Blast radius: understand the impact
CodeRabbit Change Stack - your explainability layer:
> Overview + Layers: map the PR's logical changes
> Findings: issues, proposed fixes and agent prompts
> Code Peek + AI Chat: definitions, context, answers
> Blast radius: understand the impact
My ranking of AI code reviewers after trying them at @getstorra.bsky.social:
5/5 CodeRabbit
4/5 Gitar, GitHub Copilot, Devin Review
3/5 Bito, Greptile
2/5 Qodo, Augment Code
What's reviewing your PRs?
#CodeReview #AI
My ranking of AI code reviewers after trying them at @getstorra.bsky.social:
5/5 CodeRabbit
4/5 Gitar, GitHub Copilot, Devin Review
3/5 Bito, Greptile
2/5 Qodo, Augment Code
What's reviewing your PRs?
#CodeReview #AI
CodeRabbit Change Stack connects a PR's purpose, behavior, dependencies, and code so reviewers can really verify it before approving.
Do you understand what you're about to merge?
CodeRabbit Change Stack connects a PR's purpose, behavior, dependencies, and code so reviewers can really verify it before approving.
Do you understand what you're about to merge?
◆ CodeRabbit | Product Designer
◆ Location: San Francisco
◆ Remote | Full Time
🔗 Link in bio for the full list of 4202 jobs
◆ CodeRabbit | Product Designer
◆ Location: San Francisco
◆ Remote | Full Time
🔗 Link in bio for the full list of 4202 jobs
just saw a repo which triggers reviews from the following bots whenever you make a PR:
* coderabbit
* chatgpt codex
* gemini code assist
* greptile
lmfao
they also have a custom oxlint plugin named "anti-slop". this is along side of their
* `.claude/`
* `.opencode/`
* ` […]
just saw a repo which triggers reviews from the following bots whenever you make a PR:
* coderabbit
* chatgpt codex
* gemini code assist
* greptile
lmfao
they also have a custom oxlint plugin named "anti-slop". this is along side of their
* `.claude/`
* `.opencode/`
* ` […]
The rest assumes fewer tokens per task. The first two independent reads measured more: Artificial Analysis 260M output tokens ("very verbose"), CodeRabbit 40-60% above production.
The rest assumes fewer tokens per task. The first two independent reads measured more: Artificial Analysis 260M output tokens ("very verbose"), CodeRabbit 40-60% above production.
實察文|CodeRabbit:AI 程式碼審查(開源免費)。最後查核:2026-09-22 https://ampm-aiops.com/guides/coderabbit-survey-2026/
實察文|CodeRabbit:AI 程式碼審查(開源免費)。最後查核:2026-09-22 https://ampm-aiops.com/guides/coderabbit-survey-2026/
1. They write ~20% more code
2. They commit ~70% more bugs
3. Including 174% more security issues
4. And 200% more readability issues
www.coderabbit.ai/blog/state-o...
I’d expect journalists to be rather similar.
1. They write ~20% more code
2. They commit ~70% more bugs
3. Including 174% more security issues
4. And 200% more readability issues
www.coderabbit.ai/blog/state-o...
I’d expect journalists to be rather similar.
5. A tool like CodeRabbit reviews the pull request.
6. SonarQube runs every night on the whole codebase.
5. A tool like CodeRabbit reviews the pull request.
6. SonarQube runs every night on the whole codebase.