#Coevolution
Happy to report there is a similar sentiment in Brittany France, where we are currently holding a conference on the coevolution of host and parasite :-) 
November 4, 2026 at 1:31 PM
A Sword-billed Hummingbird for #BirdOfTheDay theme of #Backlit. A cool example of extreme coevolution between the #birds and passionflowers- the only known bird with a bill longer than the rest of the body. Backlit because this guy was in and out in a flash and I didn't manage to get good photos.
November 6, 2026 at 1:43 PM
Last days (10.11) to apply for 2-year #Postdoc involving #fossils, #parasites and #phylogenetics. All with a doctoral degree in biology or related field within 7 years prior to start of employment (2/2027) should be eligible to apply. #coevolution #cophylogeny #parasitology #evolution #paleobiology
Four days left (10.11) to apply for 2-year #Postdoc opportunity involving Bayesian #phylogenetics and (fossil) #parasites. Everyone who obtained their doctoral degree in biological sciences or a related field within 7 years prior to the start of employment (February 2027) are eligible to apply.
🦠 We're hiring a 2-year postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Warsaw, to join the PARADIVE lab: euraxess.ec.europa.eu/jobs/469223
November 6, 2026 at 1:25 PM
A minimal dynamical model of human-AI cognitive coevolution
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06928
November 6, 2026 at 3:46 PM
Accessory genome evolution in giant bacteria: antimicrobial resistance, secondary metabolism, and phage–host coevolution in free-living and symbiotic lineages
#microbiology #bacteria #phages #MicroSky
@microbiomej.bsky.social
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Accessory genome evolution in giant bacteria: antimicrobial resistance, secondary metabolism, and phage–host coevolution in free-living and symbiotic lineages - Environmental Microbiome
Giant sulfur-oxidizing bacteria of the family Beggiatoaceae and their symbiotic relatives (Candidatus Epulonipiscium and related taxa) represent some of the largest and most morphologically conspicuou...
link.springer.com
November 3, 2026 at 8:34 AM
You heard it here first! @mgstetter.bsky.social and I (w/ @jrossibarra.bsky.social behind the scenes) are organizing an SMBE 2027 session! You can submit abstracts to our exciting session "Plant-human coevolution: Domestication and adaptation to agriculture" starting Nov. 20. smbe2027.org/program/
Program · SMBE 2027
Selected and thematic symposia for SMBE 2027 in Québec City: organizers, invited speakers and abstracts.
smbe2027.org
November 3, 2026 at 11:08 PM
Petar Jolakoski, Dimitar Trajanov, Qiyu Sun, Zhen Wu, Ljupco Kocarev: A minimal dynamical model of human-AI cognitive coevolution https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06928 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2611.06928 https://arxiv.org/html/2611.06928
November 6, 2026 at 7:00 AM
Such fantastic work @blongdon.bsky.social et al! It was our honor to comment upon it 🤓 #Coevolution is #Fascinating as well as highly #Dynamic !!!
With a nice commentary piece by @grahammunology.bsky.social and @davidchvo.bsky.social "Dynamism under the hood: Coevolutionary maintenance of variation in hosts and parasites" doi.org/10.1371/jour... on our recent paper on GxG host-virus interactions
Been a long time coming - lots of hard work from Aleksei Belyi together with @ali--wilson.bsky.social and Frank Jiggins
November 1, 2026 at 8:57 PM
Pressure for this cuckoo to match host eggs leads to accumulation of deleterious mutations via hitchhiking.

"Maternal inheritance accelerates sex chromosome degeneration and mitonuclear coevolution in a brood parasitic bird"
by Sorensen et al. (2026)
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Maternal inheritance accelerates sex chromosome degeneration and mitonuclear coevolution in a brood parasitic bird - Nature Ecology & Evolution
Comparative genomics across eight songbird species links strong ecological selection on maternally inherited egg colour phenotypes to both accelerated W chromosome degeneration and mitonuclear coevolu...
www.nature.com
October 31, 2026 at 5:25 AM
Molecular Dialogue Between Parasites and Hosts: Interactions and Coevolution pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42966478/
November 1, 2026 at 8:15 AM
🚨 PhD Opportunity 🚨
Come join the SABER team at @openuniversity.bsky.social to explore the origins of Amazonian #biodiversity by modelling insect-plant coevolution in South America! 🦋🌺

Project details & how to apply below ⬇️

#PhD #CENTA #Evolution #Amazon

centa.ac.uk/studentship/...
2027-OU05 Petals and pollinators: modelling the co-evolution of insects and angiosperms in ancient Amazonian rainforests – CENTA
centa.ac.uk
October 30, 2026 at 11:52 AM
Unintelligent Design - Evolution Of Egg Mimicry In The Parasitic Cuckoo Finch Carries A Genetic Cost - No Intelligence Detected
Male cuckoo finch, _Anomalospiza imberbis_ By terathopius - https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/1507136, CC BY 4.0, Link Maternal inheritance accelerates sex chromosome degeneration and mitonuclear coevolution in a brood parasitic bird | Nature Ecology & Evolution **Cuckoo finch mimicry of tawny-flanked prinia eggs**. This photograph shows eggs of the cuckoo finch (middle circle) and one of its common host species, the tawny-flanked prinia (outer circle), revealing the diversity of host egg colour and pattern “signatures” (an anti-parasite adaptation that aids host parents in recognizing their own eggs) that are mimicked by cuckoo finch egg “forgeries". However, cuckoo finches do not mimic the rich olive-green eggs (top left) laid by some tawny-flanked prinia females. The new study suggests that a genetic constraint in cuckoo finches may account for their apparent inability to mimic this host egg type. Source: University of Cambridge (2022). An intelligent designer worth its salt would presumably avoid improving one feature by compromising another, then introducing further modifications to compensate for the damage. Yet this is precisely the sort of outcome we should expect from evolution: adaptations that work well enough to spread, carrying disadvantages with them because natural selection cannot separate every useful change from its genetic baggage. The African cuckoo-finch, _Anomalospiza imberbis_ , provides a particularly revealing example. Cuckoo-finches are brood parasites: they lay their eggs in other birds’ nests and leave the hosts to rear their offspring. Their success depends partly on producing eggs that resemble those of their intended foster parents. Hosts, meanwhile, benefit from recognising and rejecting the impostors. The result is an evolutionary arms race between increasingly effective deception and increasingly effective detection — an odd arrangement to attribute to a single intelligent designer supposedly responsible for both sides. Fig. 1 Maternal inheritance of egg mimicry in cuckoo finches. Cuckoo finch females associated with different hosts and with different mimetic egg phenotypes belong to distinct mt lineages. A total of eight unique haplotypes were found for a 507-bp portion of the mt ND2 gene, including two closely related haplotypes within the blue lineage associated with P. subflava, and two closely related haplotypes in the lineage associated with C. juncidis. Within the blue and red lineages associated with P. subflava, the background color of cuckoo finch eggs ranged from blue to white and from red to white, respectively. At our field site, some P. subflava eggs have an olive-green background color (dotted box), a phenotype that is not currently mimicked by any cuckoo finches. C. juncidis and C. natalensis and the cuckoo finches parasitizing them also lay polymorphic eggs, but samples were available for only one parasitic variant for each of these host species. The mt divergence between cuckoo finches associated with Prinia and Cisticola hosts is substantial, with 9.0% uncorrected sequence divergence corresponding to an estimated divergence time of 2.3 million years. Source:C.N. Spottiswoode, et al (2022). Earlier research, described in a University of Cambridge news release, established that female cuckoo-finches inherit their egg mimicry through the maternal line, associated with the female-specific W chromosome. This helps preserve the particular egg appearance suited to a particular host, without interference from a father whose mother exploited a different host species. It is an effective evolutionary solution, but one with strings attached. Now, a paper published in Nature Ecology & Evolution on 27 October 2026, by Michael D. Sorenson and colleagues, reveals a deeper genomic cost. Selection favouring mimetic egg colouration can carry slightly harmful mutations along with it through genetic hitchhiking. The researchers link this process to accelerated loss and deterioration of genes on the W chromosome. Because mitochondrial DNA travels down the same maternal line, it too is caught up in the consequences. The study also finds evidence of compensatory changes in nuclear genes whose products interact with mitochondrial components. In other words, adaptation associated with successful egg mimicry appears to have generated pressures for further evolutionary adjustments in the machinery of cellular energy production. This is not a consciously planned repair programme; it is another round of selection acting on the consequences of what came before, and is an example of how complexity can be the consequence of sub-optimal compromises in earlier evolutionary history; not a hallmark of intelligent design that creationists imagine it to be. There is no paradox here for evolutionary biology. Natural selection favours reproductive success under existing conditions, using the variation available within an inherited genetic system. It has neither foresight nor the freedom to redesign that system from scratch. A beneficial trait can therefore spread despite associated costs, provided its overall advantage is sufficient. For intelligent design creationism, however, the awkward question remains: why would an allegedly foresighted designer tie a useful adaptation to harmful genetic baggage, then require compensatory alterations elsewhere? Evolution supplies a mechanism for such compromises. Calling them intelligent design merely gives the problem a flattering name. The Malevolent Designer: Why Nature's God is Not Good, p 101-102 Show publication details > Abstract The coevolution of interacting mitochondrial and nuclear genes is increasingly recognized as a critical component of organismal fitness and a potential source of genetic incompatibilities that promote speciation. In species with ‘ZW’ sex chromosomes, however, selection on maternally inherited traits may impact mitonuclear coevolution owing to the effective linkage of the W chromosome and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Here we show that in brood parasitic cuckoo finches (Anomalospiza imberbis), enhanced ecological selection on a maternally inherited trait (mimetic egg colouration) subjects both the W chromosome and mtDNA to increased accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations via genetic hitchhiking, accelerating W chromosome pseudogenization and gene loss, as well as mitonuclear coevolution. Remarkably, as other W-linked genes were lost, two egg colour genes, representing likely targets of selection during cuckoo finch–host coevolution, were recruited to the W chromosome. Using structural models of the respiratory complexes and mitoribosome, we also show that the rate of amino acid substitution in nuclear-encoded residues is a function of their proximity to mtDNA-encoded residues, providing evidence of compensatory mitonuclear coevolution. Our results link species-level coevolution to both sex chromosome degeneration and mitonuclear coevolution. More generally, they highlight the genomic consequences of adaptation without recombination. > > > > Sorenson, M.D., Osipova, E., Spottiswoode, C.N. et al. Maternal inheritance accelerates sex chromosome degeneration and mitonuclear coevolution in a brood parasitic bird. Nat Ecol Evol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-026-03216-w > > © 2026 Springer Nature Ltd. > Reprinted under the terms of s60 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. What makes this example so revealing is that the advantage and the disadvantage arise from the same inherited arrangement. Maternal inheritance helps cuckoo-finches preserve the egg mimicry on which their reproductive success depends, while also allowing harmful genetic changes to hitchhike alongside favourable ones. Evolution can produce an effective adaptation without producing an organism that is optimal in every respect. Success in getting eggs accepted by a host does not require freedom from costs elsewhere in the genome. The evidence for compensatory evolution adds another layer to the story. Changes in interacting nuclear genes appear to have helped accommodate changes in mitochondrial components, illustrating how one evolutionary development can alter the selection pressures acting on another. There is no foresight in this process, no assessment of future maintenance costs and no opportunity to start again with a clean sheet. There are inherited structures, new variations and differences in reproductive success. For intelligent design creationism, the explanatory difficulties multiply. Its proposed designer must be credited with the parasite’s deception, the host’s defences against that deception, and a genetic arrangement that links successful mimicry to potentially damaging changes. Compensatory modifications then become remedies for problems arising within the designer’s own system, adding complexity which could have been avoided by an intelligent designer possessed with foresight and the ability to start again from scratch. An appeal to mysterious intentions can accommodate any such outcome, but it explains neither the particular compromise nor the genetic mechanism that produced it. Evolutionary biology, by contrast, makes these compromises intelligible and open to investigation. The researchers have connected an ecological arms race to changes within chromosomes and the molecular machinery of cells. The result is another example of adaptation proceeding through inherited constraints, with benefits and costs travelling together. Calling this intelligent design does nothing to improve the explanation; it merely leaves the supposed designer responsible for the consequences. * * * **Advertisement** **Amazon** USA $14.20 UK £11.20 **Amazon** USA $14.15 UK £11.20 **Amazon** USA $12.90 UK £10.00 **Amazon** USA $16.00 UK £12.60 **Amazon** USA $12.50UK £9.30 **Amazon** USA $12.00UK £9.93 **Amazon** USA $12.50UK £10.00 **Amazon** USA $10.50UK £8.30 **Amazon** USA $12.00UK £10.00 **Amazon** USA $15.00UK £12.29 **Amazon** USA $7.50UK £5.75 **Amazon** USA $10.20UK £8.30 **All titles available in paperback, hardcover, ebook for Kindle and audio format.** **Prices correct at time of publication. Click here for current prices.** **Advertisement** Click for My Books ### Thank you for sharing! Tweet Link Blue Sky Flip to Flipboard If you've enjoyed my blog please show your appreciation by giving to a great cause - Oxfam Be Humankind. Feed the world.
rosarubicondior.blogspot.com
November 4, 2026 at 7:15 PM
How secure is LiDAR perception against adversarial attacks? 🤔

🔍 Discover how adversarially guided diffusion can reveal vulnerabilities and help build more resilient autonomous systems.

📖 Read our latest #CoEvolution article! 👇
coevolution-project.eu/towards-more...
Towards More Robust LiDAR Perception: Exploring Vulnerabilities through Adversarially Guided Diffusion - CoEvolution
Learn how modern AI models can adapt in dynamic environments without compromising security, transparency, or reliability. This article outlines best practices for designing safe and trustworthy AI systems.
coevolution-project.eu
October 30, 2026 at 9:01 AM
There is no peaceful coexistence between host and viruses. Rather, it is a constant struggle for superiority that looks from the outside like a fine-tuned natural balance.

journals.plos.org/plosbiology/...
Host–virus interactions dominate fitness and conceal additive genetic variation
Host–parasite coevolution has the potential to erode genetic variation, but natural populations often retain extensive genetic variation in susceptibility and infectivity. This study of Drosophila mel...
journals.plos.org
October 30, 2026 at 1:21 PM
Eukaryotic Mitogenomes and Their Key Insights: Architecture, Evolution, and Mitonuclear Coevolution https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42941783/
October 29, 2026 at 6:47 AM
Maternal inheritance accelerates sex chromosome degeneration and mitonuclear coevolution in a brood parasitic bird
Felsenstein, J. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78, 737–756 (1974). Hadany, L. & Feldman, M. W. Evolutionary traction: the cost of adaptation and the evolution of sex. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 309–314 (2005). Hartfield, M. & Otto, S. P. Recombination and hitchhiking of deleterious alleles. Evolution 65, 2421–2434 (2011). Rice, W. R. Genetic hitchhiking and the evolution of reduced genetic activity of the Y sex chromosome. Genetics 116, 161–167 (1987). Bachtrog, D. Evidence that positive selection drives Y-chromosome degeneration in Drosophila miranda. Nat. Genet. 36, 518–522 (2004). Smeds, L. et al. Evolutionary analysis of the female-specific avian W chromosome. Nat. Commun. 6, 7330 (2015). Irwin, D. E. Sex chromosomes and speciation in birds and other ZW systems. Mol. Ecol. 27, 3831–3851 (2018). Wang, S., Mank, J. E., Ortiz-Barrientos, D. & Rieseberg, L. H. Genome architecture and speciation in plants and animals. Mol. Ecol. 34, e70004 (2025). Hill, G. E. Mitonuclear compensatory coevolution. Trends Genet. 36, 403–414 (2020). Havird, J. C., Whitehill, N. S., Snow, C. D. & Sloan, D. B. Conservative and compensatory evolution in oxidative phosphorylation complexes of angiosperms with highly divergent rates of mitochondrial genome evolution. Evolution 69, 3069–3081 (2015). Spottiswoode, C. N. & Stevens, M. Visual...
www.nature.com
October 31, 2026 at 2:44 AM
Maternal inheritance accelerates sex chromosome degeneration and mitonuclear coevolution in a brood parasitic bird
Felsenstein, J. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78, 737–756 (1974). Hadany, L. & Feldman, M. W. Evolutionary traction: the cost of adaptation and the evolution of sex. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 309–314 (2005). Hartfield, M. & Otto, S. P. Recombination and hitchhiking of deleterious alleles. Evolution 65, 2421–2434 (2011). Rice, W. R. Genetic hitchhiking and the evolution of reduced genetic activity of the Y sex chromosome. Genetics 116, 161–167 (1987). Bachtrog, D. Evidence that positive selection drives Y-chromosome degeneration in Drosophila miranda. Nat. Genet. 36, 518–522 (2004). Smeds, L. et al. Evolutionary analysis of the female-specific avian W chromosome. Nat. Commun. 6, 7330 (2015). Irwin, D. E. Sex chromosomes and speciation in birds and other ZW systems. Mol. Ecol. 27, 3831–3851 (2018). Wang, S., Mank, J. E., Ortiz-Barrientos, D. & Rieseberg, L. H. Genome architecture and speciation in plants and animals. Mol. Ecol. 34, e70004 (2025). Hill, G. E. Mitonuclear compensatory coevolution. Trends Genet. 36, 403–414 (2020). Havird, J. C., Whitehill, N. S., Snow, C. D. & Sloan, D. B. Conservative and compensatory evolution in oxidative phosphorylation complexes of angiosperms with highly divergent rates of mitochondrial genome evolution. Evolution 69, 3069–3081 (2015). Spottiswoode, C. N. & Stevens, M. Visual...
www.nature.com
October 31, 2026 at 2:44 AM
Eukaryotic Mitogenomes and Their Key Insights: Architecture, Evolution, and Mitonuclear Coevolution https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42941783/
October 28, 2026 at 6:45 AM
The relationship between stone pine species and nutcracker species interaction is coevolved mutalism.

link.springer.com/chapter/10.1...
The Impact of Seed Dispersal by Clark’s Nutcracker on Whitebark Pine: Multi-scale Perspective on a High Mountain Mutualism
The holarctic mutualisms between Cembrae Pines (Pinus, Pinaceae) and nutcrackers (Nucifraga, Corvidae) comprise important textbook examples of interaction and coevolution. However, only recently we ha...
link.springer.com
October 28, 2026 at 10:49 AM
Wenjie Qiu, Hepei Li, Jianfeng Wang, Jun Zhang, Yue-Jiao Gong: WCC: A Learning-Based Framework for Deciding When to Apply Cooperative Coevolution in Large-Scale Optimization https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37329 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.37329 https://arxiv.org/html/2610.37329
October 28, 2026 at 6:44 AM