Jeff Landfield told the assembly his critical video was removed from Facebook after an APD‑initiated copyright claim; municipal leaders said the takedown was a well‑intentioned but mistaken request that was retracted and the video restored.

An investigation by 404 Media reveals that Amazon is purchasing large quantities of rare books, scanning them for AI training data, and destroying the physical copies in a Las Vegas warehouse. By tracking a rare book from acquisition to disposal, reporters uncovered a process where Amazon employees cut book bindings to expedite scanning, effectively erasing the physical text. The company claims these books are acquired through commercial channels to improve customer services, but critics argue this practice undermines cultural preservation. Legal debates emerged around copyright laws, with some cases requiring AI firms to destroy scanned books to comply with intellectual property rules. Commenters highlighted ethical concerns about sacrificing rare texts for profit, while others defended Amazon's right to manage its purchased assets. The article underscores tensions between technological advancement, corporate interests, and the preservation of cultural heritage.

Close to $2bn went into half a million works last year, a cost base publishers can now price against in licensing talks. What terms would make a deal work?

Close to $2bn went into half a million works last year, a cost base publishers can now price against in licensing talks. What terms would make a deal work?

The article discusses the legal and ethical challenges posed by AI-generated code in open-source software development. It highlights how AI tools produce code with uncertain copyright protections, threatening the integrity of open-source projects that rely on copyright enforcement. Contributors warn that fully AI-generated code lacks copyright ownership, while partially AI-assisted code remains legally ambiguous. This creates risks for open-source communities, as low-quality or malicious code could pollute repositories. The text also mentions the potential for AI to automate code reviews, but cautions against merging AI-generated contributions without human oversight. Legal experts note that the absence of clear copyright frameworks for AI output could undermine the licensing models (like GPL) that govern open-source projects. The discussion underscores the need for gatekeeping and quality standards in projects facing an influx of AI-generated submissions, raising concerns about the long-term viability of open-source ecosystems in the age of AI. Contributors argue that while AI can enhance productivity, it also introduces complexities that require careful management to preserve the trust and collaboration central to open-source development.

The decision was welcomed as a first step which avoided the worst outcome .

Seedance 2.0 faces strong criticism from Hollywood groups over alleged copyright violations and use of studio owned characters.

Uncover the legal conundrum lurking behind the mesmerising night lights of the Eiffel Tower! 🇫🇷✨

A Reddit moderator known as “KlammereFyr” was recently convicted by a Danish court after clipping and posting hundreds of nude scenes that actresses filmed for movies and TV shows but apparently never...

Disney s lawyers sent a cease-and-desist letter to Character.AI demanding the AI chatbot company remove numerous characters owned by the Mouse House -- and accusing the startup of blatantly infringing Disney s copyrights.

Microsoft has been hit with a lawsuit by a group of authors who claim the company used their books without permission to train its Megatron artificial intelligence model. From a report: Kai Bird, Jia...

These AI models can’t “unlearn” what they’ve seen. So where does that leave authors like me whose works were scraped without my awareness?

India Is Back On America’s Watch List Over Intellectual Property Protection Failure.

Teachers address potential copyright violations and plagiarism in using AI for schoolwork.