MIDRIB & PROTO - Autopilot Engage Dedman + Rea - Don't No U Pete Cannon - Here we go again CYBEREALITYライフ - I Wish I Had Been 29 In the 90's and Gone To Fantazia '92 Bubbless - The Bass Altern 8 - E-

Benjamin Edwards (University of Nevada, William S. Boyd School of Law) and Carliss Chatman (Southern Methodist University – Dedman School of Law) have posted DExit for Dollars: A Response to Professor Bainbridge (Journal of Corporation Law) on SSRN. Here is the abstract: In DExit Drivers, Professor Stephen Bainbridge offers a careful assessment of Delaware’s corporate-law dominance and concludes that recent departures pose little serious threat to the First State.

Christopher K. Odinet (Texas A&M University School of Law), Andrea Tosato (Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law), and Yesha Yadav (Vanderbilt University - Law School; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)) have posted The Moneyness of Stablecoins (Yale Law Journal, forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract: Money is omnipresent. Yet defining its fundamental character proves surprisingly difficult. Functional descriptions tell us what money does, not what money is, and they certainly do not explain how something becomes money in the first place.

JONESBORO — A new scholarship at Arkansas State University will help Arkansas students pursuing degrees in business and STEM fields while honoring the values of education, opportunity and service that have shaped one Arkansas family for generations. Ronald Dedman ’78 and Mitchell Dedman ’11, both of Little Rock, have established the Ronald and Mitchell Dedman Legacy Scholarship, creating a $50,000 endowment through the Arkansas State University System Foundation to support undergraduate students attending A-State.

Explore this post and more from the FortWorth community

Plaintiffs represented by the Texas Civil Rights Project and the First Amendment Clinic at SMU Dedman School of Law are suing O'Hare for violating free speech.

Collated by Rolando Torres Martin. Enjoy fresh sounds, here on-demand, or every Mon 8pm UK BST via: bewaretheradio.com / smart speaker / apps 1. Artisoma x Muadeep - Speak (YUKU) 2. JLZ - DZ7 (Origi...

Brad Baranowski, SMU Dedman School of Law, has posted Remaking Rulemaking: Lessons from the History of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), which appeared in the Cleveland-State Law Review: This Article uses the lost history of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) to provide a framework for rulemaking at the busy intersection of complex litigation and appellate finality. The drafters of the original civil rules spent more time thinking through how to efficiently combine claims and parties in civil actions-a promised benefit of the proposed law-equity merger-than about how combined claims should be disassembled. This failure would haunt the original Advisory Committee on Civil Rules for years. Nowhere was this more evident than in the first decades of Rule 54(b)'s existence. Promulgated in 1938, Rule 54(b) was designed to provide for partial final judgments in multiclaim actions, but it quickly caused confusion in the courts of appeals. Leading jurists such as Jerome Frank, Learned Hand, Felix Frankfurter, and, above all, Charles E. Clark, the first reporter for the Advisory Committee and the Rules' primary drafter, sparred over its purpose, application, and legitimacy. The debate over amending the rule was often technical. But the stakes of the controversy hinged on a fundamental issue about the scope of rulemaking authority under the Rules Enabling Act. Namely, who should work out the tensions between law and equity after their merger: the courts, Congress, or the rulemakers? The Supreme Court resolved this debate in 1956 by tapping the rulemakers. This is the point at which a standard history of Rule 54(b) would begin. But the rulemakers' first, abortive efforts to devise a rule of district-court procedure that would advance the goals of the law-equity merger (especially promoting efficiency in complex litigation) while respecting the separation of powers (especially the statutory policy of the final judgment rule) can provide lessons for rulemakers today as they continue to grapple with appellate finality. And as this Article concludes, those lessons provide a framework for analyzing rule proposals related to appellate finality, one that focuses the exercise of the rulemaking authority on further advancing the law-equity merger. --Dan Ernst

**Brad Baranowski, SMU Dedman School of Law** , has posted Remaking Rulemaking: Lessons from the History of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), which appeared in the _Cleveland-State Law Review_ : > This Article uses the lost history of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) to provide a framework for rulemaking at the busy intersection of complex litigation and appellate finality. The drafters of the original civil rules spent more time thinking through how to efficiently combine claims and parties in civil actions-a promised benefit of the proposed law-equity merger-than about how combined claims should be disassembled. This failure would haunt the original Advisory Committee on Civil Rules for years. Nowhere was this more evident than in the first decades of Rule 54(b)'s existence. > > Promulgated in 1938, Rule 54(b) was designed to provide for partial final judgments in multiclaim actions, but it quickly caused confusion in the courts of appeals. Leading jurists such as Jerome Frank, Learned Hand, Felix Frankfurter, and, above all, Charles E. Clark, the first reporter for the Advisory Committee and the Rules' primary drafter, sparred over its purpose, application, and legitimacy. The debate over amending the rule was often technical. But the stakes of the controversy hinged on a fundamental issue about the scope of rulemaking authority under the Rules Enabling Act. Namely, who should work out the tensions between law and equity after their merger: the courts, Congress, or the rulemakers? > > The Supreme Court resolved this debate in 1956 by tapping the rulemakers. This is the point at which a standard history of Rule 54(b) would begin. But the rulemakers' first, abortive efforts to devise a rule of district-court procedure that would advance the goals of the law-equity merger (especially promoting efficiency in complex litigation) while respecting the separation of powers (especially the statutory policy of the final judgment rule) can provide lessons for rulemakers today as they continue to grapple with appellate finality. And as this Article concludes, those lessons provide a framework for analyzing rule proposals related to appellate finality, one that focuses the exercise of the rulemaking authority on further advancing the law-equity merger. --Dan Ernst

Palikapu Dedman, Kānaka Maoli activist and founder of the Pele Defense Fund, died Aug. 22 at age 80.

2XO Whiskey and American whiskey blender Dixon Dedman have teamed with hip-hop group The Sugarhill Gang to launch “Rapper’s Delight” – The Hip-Hop Blend, priced at $79.99 (£59.17, ₹7,635)) per 750ml. The whiskey is the seventh release in the brand’s Collectibles Series and lands this September…

Amazon.com: Haunted Legends eBook : Datlow, Ellen, Mamatas, Nick, Barron, Laird, Bowes, Richard, Braunbeck, Gary A., Cadigan, Pat, Campbell, Ramsey, Dedman, Stephen, Ford, Jeffrey, Hoang, Lily, Hobson, M. K., Kiernan, Caitlín R., Laben, Carrie, Lansdale, Joe R., Reed, Kit, Pirie, Steven, Sedia, Ekaterina, Turgeon, Catherine, Valente, Catherynne M., Warren, Kaaron, YellowBoy, Erzebet, Mantooth, John: Kindle Store

Nancy A. Ethridge, 86, of Lebanon, Tennessee, passed away on September 1, 2026. She was born June 18, 1940. She was preceded in death by her beloved husband, James Ethridge; her granddaughter, Candace Dedman; and her son in law, Wayne Isabell. Nancy is survived by her daughters, Kim Wiseman (Randy)

Nancy A. Ethridge, 86, of Lebanon, Tennessee, passed away on September 1, 2026. She was born June 18, 1940. She was preceded in death by her beloved husband, James Ethridge; her granddaughter, Candace Dedman; and her son in law, Wayne Isabell. Nancy is survived by her daughters, Kim Wiseman (Randy)