borderline defamatory
November 13, 2026 at 5:22 PM
borderline defamatory
Because this is Oxford I can't work out if this is supposed to be ironic and defamatory or sincere and encouraging.
The statue of Cecil Rhodes on Oriel College has been decorated with a Ku Klux Klan hood and the sign ‘Racists Welcome Here’, in protest against the upcoming visit of self-styled “race realist” Nathan Cofnas to address the university’s Reform UK society.
November 12, 2026 at 11:54 AM
Because this is Oxford I can't work out if this is supposed to be ironic and defamatory or sincere and encouraging.
and even if it was a furry convention claiming they're buttering up kids to molest them is still defamatory as hell.
November 13, 2026 at 5:53 PM
and even if it was a furry convention claiming they're buttering up kids to molest them is still defamatory as hell.
It's not even defamatory. The link between a debtor and the one who holds that debt IS a relationship!
Just pay the man, Edson.
Just pay the man, Edson.
November 10, 2026 at 10:13 PM
It's not even defamatory. The link between a debtor and the one who holds that debt IS a relationship!
Just pay the man, Edson.
Just pay the man, Edson.
As you will read in the article, RFK states that 'any investigation based on the Guardian's research is highly defamatory'. Ooh, I hope RFK sues, and we find out all about it during 'discovery'.
November 12, 2026 at 4:03 PM
As you will read in the article, RFK states that 'any investigation based on the Guardian's research is highly defamatory'. Ooh, I hope RFK sues, and we find out all about it during 'discovery'.
“Legal battles with ex-wife”? That’s not how you spell “relentless defamatory misogyny”.
Hollywood banks on Ebenezer to bring Johnny Depp in from the cold
Hollywood banks on Ebenezer to bring Johnny Depp in from the cold
Dickens character is actor’s first big studio role after years overshadowed by legal battles with ex-wife Amber Heard
www.theguardian.com
November 8, 2026 at 7:28 AM
“Legal battles with ex-wife”? That’s not how you spell “relentless defamatory misogyny”.
Sweary. You’re both lawyers and accusing you of sweatiness is potentially defamatory and very, very scary.
November 14, 2026 at 8:59 PM
Sweary. You’re both lawyers and accusing you of sweatiness is potentially defamatory and very, very scary.
Discovery phase is why dotard doesn't sue people for calling him a drug addled diaper wearing criminal.
The factual truth is not defamatory!
The factual truth is not defamatory!
November 12, 2026 at 3:52 AM
Discovery phase is why dotard doesn't sue people for calling him a drug addled diaper wearing criminal.
The factual truth is not defamatory!
The factual truth is not defamatory!
I think I'll stop sharing any more fictional stories, my exaggerated characters, and personas. Despite repeatedly stating they're fictional, I've discovered that some people, primarily trans activists who have attacked me as a 'TERF', are spreading defamatory lies, claiming that my stories are real.
November 14, 2026 at 6:28 AM
I think I'll stop sharing any more fictional stories, my exaggerated characters, and personas. Despite repeatedly stating they're fictional, I've discovered that some people, primarily trans activists who have attacked me as a 'TERF', are spreading defamatory lies, claiming that my stories are real.
The most read article in the past 24 hours: Barnes Charges JS Reporter Who Slept With Him Worked on ‘Defamatory’ Story
Barnes Charges JS Reporter Who Slept With Him Worked on ‘Defamatory’ Story
Explosive complaint charges conflict of interest in newspaper's story about former Lt. Governor.
urbanmilwaukee.com
November 11, 2026 at 6:05 PM
The most read article in the past 24 hours: Barnes Charges JS Reporter Who Slept With Him Worked on ‘Defamatory’ Story
Good. I’m a big proponent of Free Speech. But knowing telling outrageous, defamatory lies must have consequences.
TENNESSEAN: “The president and first lady of France have filed a lawsuit in federal court in Nashville, suing the far-right podcaster and media personality Candace Owens over statements she made about the first lady.” www.tennessean.com/story/news/c...
November 9, 2026 at 11:43 PM
Good. I’m a big proponent of Free Speech. But knowing telling outrageous, defamatory lies must have consequences.
Look, regardless of feeling about the appropriateness of the accusation in question, it's fucking insane to go from that to "This person fucking runs influence ops for rapists".
Do y'all lawyers think that "spurious, defamatory accusations" only ding your rep if made in a courtroom?
Do y'all lawyers think that "spurious, defamatory accusations" only ding your rep if made in a courtroom?
November 13, 2026 at 4:05 PM
Look, regardless of feeling about the appropriateness of the accusation in question, it's fucking insane to go from that to "This person fucking runs influence ops for rapists".
Do y'all lawyers think that "spurious, defamatory accusations" only ding your rep if made in a courtroom?
Do y'all lawyers think that "spurious, defamatory accusations" only ding your rep if made in a courtroom?
4. A recent book excerpt alleges undisclosed foreign accounts holding billions from Gulf governments; Kushner calls it defamatory.
Comment: It is fact.
Comment: It is fact.
November 10, 2026 at 5:02 PM
4. A recent book excerpt alleges undisclosed foreign accounts holding billions from Gulf governments; Kushner calls it defamatory.
Comment: It is fact.
Comment: It is fact.
BRUH 😭
November 12, 2026 at 7:04 PM
BRUH 😭
This is a defamatory lie.
The founders of FWS are all well known. Magdalen Berns is dead, the others are very much NOT in jail.
The founders of FWS are all well known. Magdalen Berns is dead, the others are very much NOT in jail.
November 9, 2026 at 6:08 PM
This is a defamatory lie.
The founders of FWS are all well known. Magdalen Berns is dead, the others are very much NOT in jail.
The founders of FWS are all well known. Magdalen Berns is dead, the others are very much NOT in jail.
In response to an AP inquiry in August, it said “any claim or insinuation based on these letters that Secretary Kennedy lied under oath or to Congress is not only false but outright defamatory.”
November 13, 2026 at 6:19 AM
In response to an AP inquiry in August, it said “any claim or insinuation based on these letters that Secretary Kennedy lied under oath or to Congress is not only false but outright defamatory.”
Usha: “I just don't see why you should have to put up with it. Some of these lines are defamatory!”
Alan: “I’m sure the writers are doing their best.” #TheArchers
Alan: “I’m sure the writers are doing their best.” #TheArchers
November 15, 2026 at 12:14 PM
Usha: “I just don't see why you should have to put up with it. Some of these lines are defamatory!”
Alan: “I’m sure the writers are doing their best.” #TheArchers
Alan: “I’m sure the writers are doing their best.” #TheArchers
Almost the whole Rule 12(b)(2) argument (motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction) turned on the fact that BBC had geolocked the allegedly defamatory docu, such that US audiences could not watch it within BBC‘s terms of service
Thus, BBC did not “purposefully avail“ itself of Florida
Thus, BBC did not “purposefully avail“ itself of Florida
November 11, 2026 at 1:51 PM
Almost the whole Rule 12(b)(2) argument (motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction) turned on the fact that BBC had geolocked the allegedly defamatory docu, such that US audiences could not watch it within BBC‘s terms of service
Thus, BBC did not “purposefully avail“ itself of Florida
Thus, BBC did not “purposefully avail“ itself of Florida
The Macrons accuse Candace Owens of profiting from disinformation through merchandise sales and donations. They seek actual, presumed, and punitive damages, legal costs, a jury trial and a narrow injunction to stop her from republishing claims they say are defamatory.
www.politico.eu/article/the-...
www.politico.eu/article/the-...
November 9, 2026 at 9:43 PM
The Macrons accuse Candace Owens of profiting from disinformation through merchandise sales and donations. They seek actual, presumed, and punitive damages, legal costs, a jury trial and a narrow injunction to stop her from republishing claims they say are defamatory.
www.politico.eu/article/the-...
www.politico.eu/article/the-...
to be clear he did the bare minimum required to avoid getting sued, down to waiting until the last possible moment of the safe harbor period under state law to retract and remove the defamatory statements.
So he's not exactly chastened here either, let's be clear.
So he's not exactly chastened here either, let's be clear.
Look at this... if you actually push back against their false allegations, threatening legal action, right wing influencers will retract their claims. Doesn't undo the damage, but sure is better than the alternative: www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news...
Right-wing influencer retracts fraud allegations against Seattle grocery
Nick Shirley, recently feted at the White House, retracted his viral fraud allegations against Lam's Seafood Asian Market. "I have not uncovered any evidence."
www.seattletimes.com
November 12, 2026 at 7:23 PM
to be clear he did the bare minimum required to avoid getting sued, down to waiting until the last possible moment of the safe harbor period under state law to retract and remove the defamatory statements.
So he's not exactly chastened here either, let's be clear.
So he's not exactly chastened here either, let's be clear.
Wringing every last drop of juice from the defamatory story before retracting:
November 13, 2026 at 5:50 PM
Wringing every last drop of juice from the defamatory story before retracting:
Barnes Charges JS Reporter Who Slept With Him Worked on ‘Defamatory’ Story
Barnes Charges JS Reporter Who Slept With Him Worked on ‘Defamatory’ Story
Explosive complaint charges conflict of interest in newspaper's story about former Lt. Governor.
urbanmilwaukee.com
November 10, 2026 at 5:15 PM
Barnes Charges JS Reporter Who Slept With Him Worked on ‘Defamatory’ Story
It would take a Constitutional amendment, which ain't gonna happen. And Slotkin's "both sides-ism" is SO EGREGIOUSLY WRONG it's near defamatory and she should be condemned for suggesting it!
November 10, 2026 at 8:54 AM
It would take a Constitutional amendment, which ain't gonna happen. And Slotkin's "both sides-ism" is SO EGREGIOUSLY WRONG it's near defamatory and she should be condemned for suggesting it!
The claim that Schumer failed to fight for change isn't just a lie; it's defamatory. Schumer has a top ten rating for progressive legislation and worked his butt off to roll the green new deal into Bidens big bills and it is sickening that people smear him. Also he backed all the primary winners.
November 15, 2026 at 5:17 AM
The claim that Schumer failed to fight for change isn't just a lie; it's defamatory. Schumer has a top ten rating for progressive legislation and worked his butt off to roll the green new deal into Bidens big bills and it is sickening that people smear him. Also he backed all the primary winners.