#DiscoveryStack
LightNews LightNews
npariente.bsky.social
Experimenting with new models of peer review is essential to move to a future of #publishing that better serves science and researchers

⬇️ DiscoveryStack is an interesting attempt, aiming to separate the assessment of quality & impact

@maxkrummel.bsky.social @richardsever.bsky.social

🧪
plosbiology.org PLOS Biology @plosbiology.org · 16d
Modern #ScientificPublishing often incentivizes overstating results at the expense of ensuring rigor. @maxkrummel.bsky.social &co test #DiscoveryStack, which seeks to realign #PeerReview with its core purpose by separating the assessment of quality & impact @plosbiology.org 🧪 buff.ly/1GRnb4b
Top: The Discovery Stack model includes three sequential phases: 1) Quality Review, 2) Author Response, and 3) Impact Review. Bottom left: Eighteen manuscripts were reviewed in the pilot. Manuscripts are grouped according to recruitment source and author participation, with the number of completed Quality and Impact reviews for each manuscript depicted. Bottom right: Number of Quality and Impact reviews completed per manuscript.
September 12, 2026 at 10:32 AM
plosbiology.org
Modern #ScientificPublishing often incentivizes overstating results at the expense of ensuring rigor. @maxkrummel.bsky.social &co test #DiscoveryStack, which seeks to realign #PeerReview with its core purpose by separating the assessment of quality & impact @plosbiology.org 🧪 buff.ly/1GRnb4b
Top: The Discovery Stack model includes three sequential phases: 1) Quality Review, 2) Author Response, and 3) Impact Review. Bottom left: Eighteen manuscripts were reviewed in the pilot. Manuscripts are grouped according to recruitment source and author participation, with the number of completed Quality and Impact reviews for each manuscript depicted. Bottom right: Number of Quality and Impact reviews completed per manuscript.
September 11, 2026 at 7:55 AM
plosbiology.org
Modern #ScientificPublishing often incentivizes overstating results at the expense of ensuring rigor. @maxkrummel.bsky.social &co test #DiscoveryStack, which seeks to realign #PeerReview with its core purpose by separating the assessment of quality & impact @plosbiology.org 🧪 buff.ly/1GRnb4b
Top: The Discovery Stack model includes three sequential phases: 1) Quality Review, 2) Author Response, and 3) Impact Review. Bottom left: Eighteen manuscripts were reviewed in the pilot. Manuscripts are grouped according to recruitment source and author participation, with the number of completed Quality and Impact reviews for each manuscript depicted. Bottom right: Number of Quality and Impact reviews completed per manuscript.
September 9, 2026 at 4:30 PM
plosbiology.org
Modern #ScientificPublishing often incentivizes overstating results at the expense of ensuring rigor. @maxkrummel.bsky.social &co test #DiscoveryStack, which seeks to realign #PeerReview with its core purpose by separating the assessment of quality and impact @plosbiology.org 🧪 buff.ly/1GRnb4b
Top: The Discovery Stack model includes three sequential phases: 1) Quality Review, 2) Author Response, and 3) Impact Review. Bottom left: Eighteen manuscripts were reviewed in the pilot. Manuscripts are grouped according to recruitment source and author participation, with the number of completed Quality and Impact reviews for each manuscript depicted. Bottom right: Number of Quality and Impact reviews completed per manuscript.
September 10, 2026 at 12:55 PM