Emphatically.
Emphatically.
buffalonews.com/news/local/c...
Here is what we know.
#DriverNotCar
I do think they used it because that's how Kell O'Brien described it, which shows the pervasiveness of this language.
#DriverNotCar
They are hit WITH cars, BY drivers.
#DriverNotCar
They are hit WITH cars, BY drivers.
#DriverNotCar
www.bbc.com/news/article...
Unless you are reporting that the vehicle was unoccupied and acted alone.
#DriverNotCar
Unless you are reporting that the vehicle was unoccupied and acted alone.
#DriverNotCar
www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing...
Text: "After the vehicle hit the cyclist, it hit a parked car."
Media framing treats cars like runaway pinballs acting on their own. Inanimate objects don't hit people; drivers hit people. End the passive shielding of traffic violence.
www.ctvnews.ca/calgary/arti...
We must protect the driver at all costs!
Why?
And don't get me started about the journalistic abuse of the word "tragedy." That word had a meaning once.
@nateschweber.bsky.social
BBC: Not a single mention of their taboo word “driver”, just “cars”.
Basically the standard for BBC reporting. Every now and again one of their journalists break rank, but it’s a rarity.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...