#auspol
1earthmedia.com/woodside-bur...
Pacific leaders said, if Australia goes ahead with the North West shelf they'll withdraw their support..
You can't claim climate 'credibility' on renewables, while ignoring the humongous climate bomb you've agreed to
reneweconomy.com.au/a-big-deal-b...
"world must have new gas"
Model projection says we don't
Gas companies only worried about profit, not about the planet
Alternative to burning stuff?
Renewables now in hand, cheapest, easiest, low-emissions energy
We just need to act
bsky.app/profile/prof...
Nothing to see here, only ~64,000 litres of water, hydrocarbons and chemicals.
Maybe a little radioactive stuff too but who's looking?
It's not just carbon pollution from burning Woodside's gas that's toxic.
Great article, worth reading. 👇
#Auspol
Fundamentally, one of the worst lies of the fossil fuel industry in recent years, enabled by the for-profit carbon offsetting industry.
Meanwhile, Albanese is considering the country's biggest new fossil fuel project, the proposed NW Shelf extension... www.theguardian.com/australia-ne...
We don’t need to turn our iconic natural wonders into gas fields. We need to prioritise Australians over exports.
@emmashortis.bsky.social went to take a look ⤵️
Environment Minister Murray Watt has promised to make his call by May 31.
Extending this massively polluting project would be a disaster on 5 fronts:
#oligarchy #auspol #wapol #extinctionprofiteering
#NoNewFossilFuels
"Think of what WA does for Australia ... 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒘𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑾𝒐𝒐𝒅𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒅𝒐 𝒕𝒐 𝒎𝒆!"
#oligarchy #auspol
#oligarchy #auspol #wapol #extinctionprofiteering
#NoNewFossilFuels
#Auspol #necrocapitalism #extinctionprofiteering
No??!!
Cripes, you must not be a poor struggling barely getting by hugely profitable gas company
The North West Shelf extension will get $200bn+ of GAS FOR FREE. No royalties!
But what about PRRT? Lol No. Treasury in 2023 noted the NWS will never pay it
Terrible for the climate, fatal for Murujuga, & braindead economics
#Auspol #necrocapitalism #extinctionprofiteering
Interestingly, it did not try to quantify the potential liabilities that could arise through the advances in climate attribution science, but acknowledged it could have an impact.
And then they wonder why everyone gets mad at them.