#L019
LightNews LightNews
fi11.bsky.social
#MPG
#L019
@fi11.bsky.social
@imi35.bsky.social
@abidh.bsky.social
@awanji.bsky.social
@imran4.bsky.social
@skpmln.bsky.social
@aaghag.bsky.social
@shrwp77.bsky.social
@mnslion1.bsky.social
@charzafar.bsky.social
@mjavdsatti.bsky.social
@honeyrose33.bsky.social
@zahidsarmad4.bsky.social
December 16, 2024 at 6:24 AM
internutter.bsky.social
No chemicals necessary, but they will want treats.

peakd.com/fiction/@int...

#flashfiction #sciencefiction #shortstory #amalgamuniverse #writingprompt
Challenge #04403-L019: Organic Pest Control | PeakD
Litterbox or walkies, take your pick.... by internutter
peakd.com
January 19, 2025 at 6:35 AM
bitcoinuk.bsky.social
Jason Calacanis, host of the All-In Podcast, shared an article back in 2011 about Bitcoin. Maybe he really does know a little bit about Bitcoin.
#Bitcoin #allinpod
launch3.squarespace.com/blog/l019-bi...
Article screenshot
November 26, 2024 at 9:53 PM
ainews1.bsky.social
【今日の雑学】長尺 L019 の入口ショート。録音した自分の声は、他人の耳と同じく空気を伝わる気導音だけ。本人には頭の骨を伝わる骨導音（低い音が残りやすい）も足されるので、録音は高く薄く聞こえる。山﨑広子さんの約1万4千人の調査で84%が自分の声を嫌い/どちらかといえば嫌い。鏡像と正像の実験（本人は鏡の向き、友人は反転していない向きを好む）。気持ち悪さは聞き慣れた声とのずれ
ずんだもんが1分で解説するのだ💡

▶️ https://youtu.be/7woiEMKcz8c
#雑学 #心理学 #ずんだもん
September 30, 2026 at 12:06 PM
avadiax.bsky.social
Oh, banning BitCoin, really? http://launch.is/blog/l019-bitcoin-p2p-currency-the-most-dangerous-project-weve-ev.html
February 11, 2024 at 4:15 AM
officiallilsilver.bsky.social
Jim Keady speaks in front of the White House on December 13, 2025

www.youtube.com/watch?v=l019...
Jim Keady speaks in front of the White House on December 13, 2025
YouTube video by Refuse Fascism
www.youtube.com
December 19, 2025 at 10:08 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA01100981.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01100981
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01100963 | EFTA01100981 11/03/2011 15:58 FAX SEARCY DENNEY l019 IV. EDWARDS IS ENTITLED TO ADVERSE INFERENCES FROM EPSTEIN'S INVOCATION OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT AND THEREFORE TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON EPSTEIN'S CLAIM. Edwards is entitled to summary judgment on the claim against him for a second and .1 entirely independent reason: Epstein's repeated invocations of the Fifth Amendment raise advirse infcrenccs against him that leave no possibility that a reasonable factfinder could reach a verdict in his favor. In ruling on a summary judgment motion, the court must fulfill a "gdekeeping function" and should ask whether "a reasonable trier of fact could possibly" reach a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Willingham v. City of Orlando, 929 So.2d 43, 48 (Fla. 5th Dist. Ct. lApp. 2006) (emphasis added). Given all of the inferences that are to be drawn against Epstein, no reasonable finder of fact could conclude that Epstein was somehow the victim of implroper civil lawsuits filed against him. Instead, a reasonable finder of fact could only find that Epstein was a serial molester of children who was being held accountable through legitimate I suits brought by Edwards and others on behalf of the minor girls that Epstein victimized. "[I)1 is well-settled that the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against '1 parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); accord Vasquez v. State, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule "is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the rights of others and then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting." Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1993). And, in the proper circumstances, "'Silence is °flail' evidence of the most persuasive character."' Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 19 EFTA01100981 Epstein Web iOS app on the App Store.
May 9, 2026 at 11:37 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA01100957.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01100957
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01100939 | EFTA01100957 11/03/2011 15:58 FAX SEARCY DENNEY l019 IV. EDWARDS IS ENTITLED TO ADVERSE INFERENCES FROM EPSTEIN'S INVOCATION OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT AND THEREFORE TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON EPSTEIN'S CLAIM. Edwards is entitled to summary judgment on the claim against him for a second and .1 entirely independent reason: Epstein's repeated invocations of the Fifth Amendment raise advirse infcrenccs against him that leave no possibility that a reasonable factfinder could reach a verdict in his favor. In ruling on a summary judgment motion, the court must fulfill a "gdekeeping function" and should ask whether "a reasonable trier of fact could possibly" reach a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Willingham v. City of Orlando, 929 So.2d 43, 48 (Fla. 5th Dist. Ct. lApp. 2006) (emphasis added). Given all of the inferences that are to be drawn against Epstein, no reasonable finder of fact could conclude that Epstein was somehow the victim of implroper civil lawsuits filed against him. Instead, a reasonable finder of fact could only find that Epstein was a serial molester of children who was being held accountable through legitimate I suits brought by Edwards and others on behalf of the minor girls that Epstein victimized. "[I)1 is well-settled that the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against '1 parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); accord Vasquez v. State, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule "is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the rights of others and then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting." Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1993). And, in the proper circumstances, "'Silence is °flail' evidence of the most persuasive character."' Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 19 EFTA01100957
May 9, 2026 at 11:36 AM
avsa.eth.xyz
Bitcoin: um projeto de moeda digital decentralizada, com lastro em um número fixo de soluções matemáticas.
<a href="http://launch.is/blog/l019-bitcoin-p2p-currency-the-most-dangerous-project-weve-ev.html" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">http://launch.is/blog/l019-bitcoin-p2p-currency-the-most-dangerous-project-weve-ev.html
Page not found | LAUNCH Conference
launch.is
November 18, 2024 at 4:21 PM
peterlevy.bsky.social
Wow. This is amazing. “@Launch: L019: Bitcoin P2P Currency: The Most Dangerous Project We've Ever Seen
November 18, 2024 at 8:48 PM