#Legality
“trump pulls shocking illegal move” yea i don’t think he really cares about the legality of anything he does. he’s clearly very intentionally not caring about legality
March 18, 2025 at 9:16 PM
“There is no clear precedent for what DeSantis and the president are doing."

Experts question the legality of deploying National Guard officials as immigration judges.
Experts question the legality of deploying National Guard officials as immigration judges
"The use of military courts to hear civilian cases is the essential component of martial law."
www.motherjones.com
July 9, 2025 at 12:11 PM
my LEGALITY IS OUR FOURTH PRIORITY shirt
not sure what is more odd: that it apparently didn't crack the top three, or that it is being advertised on the DC metro
April 13, 2026 at 2:36 PM
Slavery was Legal.

Colonialism was Legal.

Jim Crow was Legal.

Apartheid was Legal.

Legality depends on who has power and the kinds of laws they pass to preserve their own privileges and bigoted views. Legality often has nothing to do with justice.
February 11, 2024 at 4:38 AM
Legality aside, how pathetic for the American head of state to fly around in the plane he got as a valentine from the Emir of Qatar. A kept little man.
May 11, 2025 at 4:21 PM
They do not care about legality
Comer incorrectly refers to Minnesota's Somali community as "illegals"
December 3, 2025 at 9:44 PM
Hegseth: "Maximum lethality -- not tepid legality. Violent effect, not politically correct. We're gonna raise up warriors. Not just defenders."
September 5, 2025 at 8:22 PM
If you’re still supporting Trump, it’s no longer a political choice. It’s a statement that you don’t care about morality, legality, or the truth.
March 31, 2026 at 8:55 AM
This comes after escalating bipartisan backlash and multiple lawsuits challenging the fund's legality. 2/2
June 5, 2026 at 10:31 PM
I think that it’s bad that the Secretary of Defense is openly trashing the concept of legality regarding military operations.
Hegseth: "Maximum lethality -- not tepid legality. Violent effect, not politically correct. We're gonna raise up warriors. Not just defenders."
September 5, 2025 at 8:30 PM
Lindsey Graham is "challenging" the legality of Trump's foreign aid cuts SO QUIETLY that he is PUBLICLY SUPPORTING THEM
February 28, 2025 at 1:56 AM
NEW: The Chairperson for the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency has sent a letter to the OPP advising they consult White House Counsel on the legality of ousting 17 inspectors general. 👀
January 25, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Reuters: COLUMBIA STUDENT MAHMOUD KHALIL MAY CONTINUE TO CHALLENGE THE LEGALITY OF HIS ARREST IN NEW JERSEY FEDERAL COURT, JUDGE RULES
April 1, 2025 at 9:45 PM
Slavery was legal.
Colonialism was legal.
Segregation was legal.

Legality is not a measure of morality.
July 2, 2025 at 9:05 AM
On the legality of Trump’s claim:
No, he isn’t. There is literally no legal means by which he can do this. It’s not presidential power. TPS by law cannot be terminated early, and Somali TPS is not set to expire until March 17, 2026.
Trump says he’s ending Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Somali refugees in Minnesota “immediately.”
November 22, 2025 at 2:03 AM
the correct response to being told to build a concentration camp is "absolutely the fuck not" regardless of the legality of the order
Trump: Today I'm also signing an executive order to instruct the departments of defense and homeland security to begin preparing the 30,000 person migrant facility at Guantanamo Bay
January 29, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Elected officials questioning the legality of ICE processes being arrested
October 3, 2025 at 8:15 PM
The fixation on "il/legality" is tripping people up, I think.
January 28, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Reminder that legality and morality are very seperate things.
December 12, 2024 at 10:39 AM
We asked Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), a constitutional law expert, about the legality of ICE agents wearing masks
June 11, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Morality begins where legality ends.
August 4, 2025 at 11:52 PM
The acting head of the government’s human resources arm, Charles Ezell, is refusing to testify in tomorrow’s case that challenges the legality of the recent mass firings of federal workers. His absence raises serious questions—what is there to hide?
March 13, 2025 at 12:51 AM
Secretary of War Grumpy Face Blacky Whitey helping me study tepid legality.
September 6, 2025 at 12:51 AM
September 3, 2025 at 9:26 PM
If you are a federal worker being offered a buyout, I would advise against taking it.

Of course, this is a personal decision for everyone and it’s your choice.

But these offers are a rush job. The legality is questionable and this admin does not keep to its word.

They aren’t firing for a reason.
January 30, 2025 at 6:02 PM