#Microfossils
Using 3D grass #microfossils to reshape what we know about early grassland #evolution

@rosaliehermans.bsky.social, et al.

nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...

#PlantScience
November 4, 2026 at 9:37 PM
Awww thanks, and thanks ☺️ this is great - pushing me out of my comfort zone for sure 🤣 I’m used to sketching sediment sections and silica microfossils (freshwater diatoms, sponges, phytoliths) - so things that are more structured and not so squishy 🤣🤣
November 2, 2026 at 11:54 PM
Great to see Molly Husdell’s first paper out on the paleoceanography of the last 600 kyr of the Cape Darnley region of East Antarctica- using diatom microfossils. With a cast of supporters @alixpost.bsky.social - molly now going a postdoc @antarcticsciaus.bsky.social
Sea Surface Conditions and Antarctic Bottom Water Formation Offshore Cape Darnley, East Antarctica, Over the Last 600 ka: New Insights From the Diatom Record
A sediment core from offshore Cape Darnley, East Antarctica, documents glacial-interglacial sea surface conditions over the past 600 ka The East Antarctic Ice Sheet potentially underwent severe r...
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
October 26, 2026 at 11:57 AM
Found a gorgeous projectile point full of microfossils in the place you would expect: an apartment complex rock garden in the middle of a city
October 23, 2026 at 2:22 PM
Thank you so much!!! Would love to see some Woodbine microfossils!🤞for some birds!
October 22, 2026 at 12:13 PM
We used geochemical signals preserved in microfossils to reconstruct past ocean temperatures from a sediment core collected in the southwest Pacific, in New Zealand's Bay of Plenty.
October 21, 2026 at 1:01 PM
Refuting Creationism - Closing The Gap - Life In The Early Ediacaran - 600 Million Years Before 'Creation Week'
Macrofossils from the Doushantuo formation at Ancangping. A–F: Ribbon-shaped vendotaenids. G: Conotubular Protoconites minor H: Balloon-shaped Longfengshania. I: Tangled filaments similar to Zunyiphyton. Ye, Q., An, Z., Chen, S. et al (2026) Microfossils from the Ancangping assemblage. A: Schizofusa zangwenlongii. B, C: Ericiasphaera magna (C is enlarged view of rectangle in B). D, E: Appendisphaera anguina. (E is enlarged view of rectangle in D). F: Eotylotopalla strobilata. G: Eotylotopalla quadrata. H: Megasphaera ornata. I: Sinosphaera asteriformis. J, K: Tanarium cuspidatum. (K is enlarged view of rectangle in J). Credit: Ye, Q., An, Z., Chen, S. et al (2026) Tiny fossils reveal a missing chapter of ocean life after Snowball Earth More than 600 million years before the supposed creation of Earth in a literal reading of Genesis, marine communities were already living through the aftermath of a planetary ice age. Their fossilised remains now provide another inconvenient glimpse of the immense history that young-Earth creationism requires its followers to dismiss. This was a world with an evolutionary past of its own, long before the appearance of familiar animals, let alone humans and their origin myths. A study by Qin Ye of the China University of Geosciences in Wuhan and colleagues, published in Communications Biology, describes an assemblage of microscopic and larger fossils from Ancangping in Hubei province, South China. The researchers identified 35 species of organic-walled microfossils known as acritarchs, together with six broad forms of macroscopic fossils. Preserved together, these remains provide an unusually useful window into communities that included both organisms living in the water column and algae growing on the seabed. The assemblage is provisionally dated to approximately 620–610 million years ago. That places it around 15–25 million years after the end of the Marinoan glaciation, one of the extreme climatic episodes associated with “Snowball Earth”, when ice extended into tropical latitudes. “After” therefore needs to be understood on a geological timescale: even the interval between the thaw and these organisms exceeds the entire young-Earth creationist chronology many thousands of times over. > What was the Marinoan glaciation? The **Marinoan glaciation** was an exceptionally severe ice age that ended about **635 million years ago** , marking the close of the Cryogenian Period and the beginning of the Ediacaran. Its starting date is less certain, but it lasted millions of years. It was the later of the two great Cryogenian glaciations associated with the **“Snowball Earth”** hypothesis. > > **How frozen was Earth?** > Geological evidence indicates that ice reached tropical latitudes. The Snowball Earth hypothesis proposes that ice covered virtually the entire ocean surface, although the extent and persistence of open water remain debated. This does not mean that the oceans froze solid: liquid water could persist beneath the ice. > > **How could such an extreme freeze develop—and end?** > Expanding snow and ice reflect more sunlight into space, causing further cooling and allowing still more ice to form. This reinforcing process is called **ice–albedo feedback**. A leading explanation for the eventual thaw involves volcanic carbon dioxide accumulating while ice cover greatly reduced the weathering of rocks that normally helps remove it from the atmosphere. Increasing greenhouse warming eventually overcame the cooling effect of the ice. As melting exposed darker surfaces, greater absorption of sunlight accelerated the thaw. > > **How did life survive?** > Life already existed before the Marinoan glaciation. Microorganisms and early organisms with complex cells survived in refuges that may have included patches of open water, environments beneath sufficiently transparent ice, and surface meltwater ponds. The relative importance of these habitats remains under investigation. The postglacial biosphere therefore developed from surviving lineages; it did not begin from scratch. > > **Where do the Ancangping fossils fit?** > Their estimated age of **620–610 million years** places them roughly **15–25 million years after the thaw**. They illuminate a later stage in the development of postglacial marine communities, rather than the immediate aftermath of melting. Even that intervening interval dwarfs the entire timescale proposed by young-Earth creationism. > > There are qualifications, and the researchers make them explicit. The fossil-bearing horizon has not been dated directly by radiometric methods; its estimated age rests on correlations with other rock sequences and their published chronological constraints. Some proposed animal affinities are also disputed. These fossils should not be presented as unequivocal evidence of early animals, nor as a precisely dated snapshot of the immediate aftermath of deglaciation. Their significance lies in helping to reconstruct an otherwise poorly documented stage in the history of marine ecosystems. That distinction between what the evidence establishes and what remains open to investigation is a strength of science. Researchers do not need to pretend that every identification is settled or every date exact. They can publish their reasoning, identify its limitations and explain how further discoveries could test it. Creationist certainty, by contrast, begins with a conclusion that the evidence is required to accommodate. Refining the age or identity of these fossils will improve our understanding of an ancient world; it will not turn that world into one created a few thousand years ago. As Andrew Zinin reports for Phys.org, the discovery helps fill a gap in the record of life after Snowball Earth. Once again, palaeontologists investigating a scientific question have uncovered evidence whose implications for a literal Genesis chronology are devastating, without needing to make creationism the subject of their research. Show publication details > Download PDF > > Abstract > Understanding of biological and ecological dynamics after the terminal Cryogenian Marinoan glaciation remains limited because the early Ediacaran fossil record is sparse and taphonomically biased toward microfossils. Here we show an early Ediacaran fossil assemblage from the Ancangping section of South China that co-preserves micro- and macrofossils in the same strata. It contains 17 genera and 35 species of acritarchs, including three new taxa, and six forms of macroscopic carbonaceous compressions. Integrated lithostratigraphic and biostratigraphic correlation with published astrochronologic and radiometric data indirectly constrains its age to approximately 620–610 million years ago, thus predating the hitherto oldest-known macrofossil assemblage (the Lantian biota at 602 million years ago) in the Ediacaran Period. The assemblage comprises cyanobacteria, phytoplankton, benthic macroalgae, and possible metazoans, indicating the co-occurrence of benthic and planktonic organisms in the aftermath of the Snowball Earth. This finding fills a temporal gap and provides insight into early Ediacaran biological communities across the Cryogenian–Ediacaran transition. > > > Microfossils from the Ancangping assemblage. > > > Ye, Q., An, Z., Chen, S. et al (2026) > > > > > Ye, Q., An, Z., Chen, S. et al. Early Ediacaran micro- and macro-fossils from South China provide insights into post-Snowball Earth marine ecosystem. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-11094-y > > Copyright: © 2026 The authors. > Published by Springer Nature Ltd. Open access. > Reprinted under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) The Ancangping fossils add another small but revealing piece to the history of life on Earth. Their importance lies not simply in their antiquity, but in the picture they provide of marine communities occupying different ecological settings in the aftermath of an extraordinary climatic upheaval. These were organisms with an evolutionary history, inhabiting a planet with a geological history—both extending far beyond the few thousand years allowed by a literal reading of Genesis. There is no need to exaggerate what the discovery establishes. The proposed age requires further testing, and some biological affinities remain uncertain. Neither qualification provides a refuge for young-Earth creationism. Uncertainty over precisely where an assemblage belongs within the Ediacaran is not evidence that it belongs within human history, and uncertainty over whether a fossil represents an alga or an early animal is not evidence of supernatural creation. The contrast in methods is telling. The researchers explain how they reached their conclusions and identify evidence that could refine or challenge them. Biblical literalism starts with its preferred answer and requires the history recorded in the rocks to conform to it. Science advances because its conclusions are open to correction; dogma remains stationary because its conclusions are protected from correction. Once again, the researchers did not need to set out to refute creationism. They investigated fossils, compared rock sequences and reconstructed an ancient ecosystem. The incompatibility with Genesis emerged simply from taking the evidence seriously. A world in which life survived planetary glaciation and continued to diversify over millions of years has a far richer history than the brief creation story its ancient authors imagined. * * * **Advertisement** **Amazon** USA $14.20 UK £11.20 **Amazon** USA $14.15 UK £11.20 **Amazon** USA $12.90 UK £10.00 **Amazon** USA $16.00 UK £12.60 **Amazon** USA $12.50UK £9.30 **Amazon** USA $12.00UK £9.93 **Amazon** USA $12.50UK £10.00 **Amazon** USA $10.50UK £8.30 **Amazon** USA $12.00UK £10.00 **Amazon** USA $15.00UK £12.29 **Amazon** USA $7.50UK £5.75 **Amazon** USA $10.20UK £8.30 **All titles available in paperback, hardcover, ebook for Kindle and audio format.** **Prices correct at time of publication. Click here for current prices.** **Advertisement** Click for My Books ### Thank you for sharing! Tweet Link Blue Sky Flip to Flipboard If you've enjoyed my blog please show your appreciation by giving to a great cause - Oxfam Be Humankind. Feed the world.
rosarubicondior.blogspot.com
October 22, 2026 at 2:01 PM
Wednesday, October 28, join us for our Homeschool Day at @nhm.org as we discuss all of the plants and animals that survived the Ice Age!

Drop in on nature chats with our scientists, make a Tar Pits-inspired craft, explore the Museum, and more. Register today: go.nhm.org/oct-homeschool
October 15, 2026 at 9:44 PM
Bayangolia vesiculosa gen. et sp. nov. dos Leitos do Limite Vendiano-Cambriano do Oeste da Mongólia: Possíveis Colônias de Bactérias Fossilizadas link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Bayangolia vesiculosa gen. et sp. nov. from the Vendian–Cambrian Boundary Beds of Western Mongolia: Possible Fossilized Bacterial Colonies - Paleontological Journal
Abstract New problematic microfossils, Bayangolia vesiculosa gen. et sp. nov., are described from the Vendian–Cambrian boundary beds of Western Mongolia, along the Bayan-Gol River. These fossils are p...
link.springer.com
October 15, 2026 at 2:54 AM
Half billion years written in tiny valves: Ostracoda - bivalved crustaceans hide their strongly reduced body in their thin carapace composed of calcite, well preserved in the fossil record. Not only microfossils, with more than ten thousand extant species. North Adria, #plankton
October 13, 2026 at 10:35 AM
4/8 "The Kheseen microfossils are just as well-preserved, yet animals continue to be absent," explains Oxford’s Ross Anderson.

The chemical conditions for fossilisation were simply unsuitable.

This realisation forced researchers to look even further back in time.
October 8, 2026 at 5:56 PM
Microfossils from Mongolia suggest the first animals may be up to 200 million years older than their oldest clear fossils, a new study finds.
Earth’s first animals may be 200 million years older than their fossils suggest
www.earth.com
October 8, 2026 at 3:37 AM
For centuries, scientists have asked a deceptively simple question: when did animals first appear? The fossil record gives one answer. Chemistry whispers another. dailygalaxy.com/2026/10/perf... #palaeontology #chemistry #fossils #Science #SciChat
Paleontologists Found Perfectly Preserved Microfossils in Mongolia, but the Animals Everyone Expected Were Missing
For centuries, scientists have asked a deceptively simple question: when did animals first appear? The fossil record gives one answer. Chemistry whispers another.
dailygalaxy.com
October 8, 2026 at 12:18 AM
🧪 Animals turn out to be much older than thought

👉 Animals may have emerged as early as 750 million years ago, much earlier than previously thought. Mongolian microfossils show that "the absence of ani...

🔗 https://whyrwe.com/@26/1003-2230

#️⃣ #science – factually fun!
🧪 Animals turn out to be much older than thought
Animals may have emerged as early as 750 million years ago, much earlier than previously thought. Mongolian microfossils show that "the absence of animal fossils is not evidence that animals were absent." Molecular clocks point to a much older origin, but direct fossils have yet to be found...
whyrwe.com
October 7, 2026 at 7:00 PM
Microfossils from Mongolia suggest the first animals may be up to 200 million years older than their oldest clear fossils, a new study finds.
Earth’s first animals may be 200 million years older than their fossils suggest
www.earth.com
October 6, 2026 at 9:41 PM
🌞 Good News 🌞
Animals may have evolved 200 million years earlier than previously thought
(by Joshua Shavit)
Animals may have evolved 200 million years earlier than previously thought
Mongolian microfossils challenge a dating assumption, placing possible animal origins roughly 800 to 700 million years ago.
www.thebrighterside.news
October 5, 2026 at 12:37 PM
Trinity researcher to lead new European Research Council project focused on ancient microfossils www.tcd.ie/news_events/...
October 2, 2026 at 4:06 PM
🧪 Animals turn out to be much older than thought

👉 ‎ Animals may have emerged as early as 750 million years ago, much earlier than previously thought. Mongolian microfossils show that "the absence of animal fossils...

🔗 ‎ whyrwe.com/@26/1003-2230

#️⃣ ‎ #whyrwe #populairScience #science
October 3, 2026 at 9:02 PM