<p>काठमाडौँ– अनुसन्धानका क्रममा प्रहरीले बरामद गरेको मोबाइल फोन प्रहरीकै आधिकारिक नियन्त्रणमा रहनुपर्ने हो। त्यसमा भएका डिजिटल प्रमाण सुरक्षित राखेर फरेन्सिक परीक्षण गर्ने र अनुसन्धानको निष्कर्ष निकाल...

NSW already has laws that can force a person to help police unlock a phone. The proposed changes would expand when those orders can be made. But some of the reporting has blurred together a roadside stop, the lawful seizure of a phone, a judicial order, Cellebrite and a ten-year prison sentence. That is not what the bill says. I’m James Glissan. I used to be a police officer and prosecutor. I now practise criminal defence. In this video, I explain how Digital Evidence Access Orders actually work, why “no search warrant” does not mean “no judge”, the real maximum penalty for refusing to comply, and what forensic tools such as Cellebrite can and cannot recover from a seized phone. That includes deleted material, encrypted messages and information stored beneath the apps you see on the screen. The reporting exaggerates parts of this proposal. That does not mean the actual power is harmless. A phone extraction can capture intimate information, privileged communications and data belonging to people who are not suspected of any offence. Returning the handset does not delete the extracted copy. This video is general information, not legal advice. Chapters: 00:00 The Claim vs the Actual Bill 01:00 How the Unlock Order Actually Works 04:04 The 7-Year Penalty: What It Really Means 05:39 What Cellebrite Can and Can’t Pull 07:44 Deleted Texts and Encryption Myths 09:04 The Real Privacy Problem If this helped you understand the system before you need it, subscribe. Which concerns you more: the seven-year maximum, or the fact that an extracted copy can remain after the phone is returned? #Cellebrite #PolicePowers #NSW #AustralianLaw #DigitalPrivacy

NSW already has laws that can force a person to help police unlock a phone. The proposed changes would expand when those orders can be made. But some of the reporting has blurred together a roadside stop, the lawful seizure of a phone, a judicial order, Cellebrite and a ten-year prison sentence. That is not what the bill says. I’m James Glissan. I used to be a police officer and prosecutor. I now practise criminal defence. In this video, I explain how Digital Evidence Access Orders actually work, why “no search warrant” does not mean “no judge”, the real maximum penalty for refusing to comply, and what forensic tools such as Cellebrite can and cannot recover from a seized phone. That includes deleted material, encrypted messages and information stored beneath the apps you see on the screen. The reporting exaggerates parts of this proposal. That does not mean the actual power is harmless. A phone extraction can capture intimate information, privileged communications and data belonging to people who are not suspected of any offence. Returning the handset does not delete the extracted copy. This video is general information, not legal advice. Chapters: 00:00 The Claim vs the Actual Bill 01:00 How the Unlock Order Actually Works 04:04 The 7-Year Penalty: What It Really Means 05:39 What Cellebrite Can and Can’t Pull 07:44 Deleted Texts and Encryption Myths 09:04 The Real Privacy Problem If this helped you understand the system before you need it, subscribe. Which concerns you more: the seven-year maximum, or the fact that an extracted copy can remain after the phone is returned? #Cellebrite #PolicePowers #NSW #AustralianLaw #DigitalPrivacy

NSW already has laws that can force a person to help police unlock a phone. The proposed changes would expand when those orders can be made. But some of the reporting has blurred together a roadside stop, the lawful seizure of a phone, a judicial order, Cellebrite and a ten-year prison sentence. That is not what the bill says. I’m James Glissan. I used to be a police officer and prosecutor. I now practise criminal defence. In this video, I explain how Digital Evidence Access Orders actually work, why “no search warrant” does not mean “no judge”, the real maximum penalty for refusing to comply, and what forensic tools such as Cellebrite can and cannot recover from a seized phone. That includes deleted material, encrypted messages and information stored beneath the apps you see on the screen. The reporting exaggerates parts of this proposal. That does not mean the actual power is harmless. A phone extraction can capture intimate information, privileged communications and data belonging to people who are not suspected of any offence. Returning the handset does not delete the extracted copy. This video is general information, not legal advice. Chapters: 00:00 The Claim vs the Actual Bill 01:00 How the Unlock Order Actually Works 04:04 The 7-Year Penalty: What It Really Means 05:39 What Cellebrite Can and Can’t Pull 07:44 Deleted Texts and Encryption Myths 09:04 The Real Privacy Problem If this helped you understand the system before you need it, subscribe. Which concerns you more: the seven-year maximum, or the fact that an extracted copy can remain after the phone is returned? #Cellebrite #PolicePowers #NSW #AustralianLaw #DigitalPrivacy

Hello fellow socially responsible beer drinkers. I've using the Untappd app for a long time now (3.7k check-ins and counting) but just more ...

A current app list answers one question. Installation logs, App Store databases, Biome streams, and deletion records answer several others. We went back to an iOS workflow from 2018, tested it from iO...

Mobile Forensics is a constantly evolving field. While many of the roadblocks examiners face today are not new problems, there may be new solutions around them. In this episode we'll explore some of the biggest roadblocks in a mobile device investigation and discuss the ways you can navigate around those issues. Whether you're new to mobile or an old pro, this episode will explore the issues undoubtedly waiting for you in your workflows.

In working through some sample evidence during training I came across that Digital Wellbeing, specifically Samsung's iteration of it, tracks...

When the adversary anticipates your acquisition methodology, the examination starts before the device arrives

From college to career and beyond

When I get a call, I don’t have time to plan. I grab my bag and go. Every tool in it is tested. Every cable has a purpose. If something’s…

In the ever-evolving world of digital forensics, new tools and techniques are constantly emerging to help investigators gain insights into…

A few months back Android introduced their new intrusion logging capabilities as part of their advanced protection mode. Security Lab has a ...

A look at United Airlines iOS app research in iLEAPP, including where the data lived, which rabbit holes mattered, and why nearby app/plugin data can change the shape of the parser.

iLEAPP v2.1.2 Short Cuts added to GUI Crtl + I - Focus in Input File Field Crtl + O - Focus in Output File Field Crtl + F - Focus in Filter Field) New modules: Kleinanzeigen.de, Apple WorldCloc...