"Pathomic analysis of 5-year surveillance biopsies as predictors of kidney allograft loss" by Pinaki Sarder et al
buff.ly/IfYyiqY
#Pathomics #KidneyTransplant
"Pathomic analysis of 5-year surveillance biopsies as predictors of kidney allograft loss" by Pinaki Sarder et al
buff.ly/IfYyiqY
#Pathomics #KidneyTransplant
🔬 Without clinical variables, pathomics outperformed MEST-C
📊 C-statistic:
🔹 Pathomics: 0.74
🔹 MEST-C: 0.69
📈 However, adding clinical variables reversed this advantage:
🔹 Pathomics: 0.76
🔹 MEST-C: 0.79
🔬 Without clinical variables, pathomics outperformed MEST-C
📊 C-statistic:
🔹 Pathomics: 0.74
🔹 MEST-C: 0.69
📈 However, adding clinical variables reversed this advantage:
🔹 Pathomics: 0.76
🔹 MEST-C: 0.79
📈 Adding pathomics improved the International IgAN Prediction Tool
📊 C-statistic (without ethnicity):
🔹 Standard model: 0.81
🔹 + Pathomics: 0.83
🎯 Improvement: +0.024 (95% CI 0.019–0.028)
📈 Adding pathomics improved the International IgAN Prediction Tool
📊 C-statistic (without ethnicity):
🔹 Standard model: 0.81
🔹 + Pathomics: 0.83
🎯 Improvement: +0.024 (95% CI 0.019–0.028)
📊 Both MEST-C and pathomics models stratified patients into 4 risk groups
📉 Kaplan–Meier curves showed progressively worse kidney outcomes with increasing risk
🔬 Pathomics provided comparable risk stratification
📊 Both MEST-C and pathomics models stratified patients into 4 risk groups
📉 Kaplan–Meier curves showed progressively worse kidney outcomes with increasing risk
🔬 Pathomics provided comparable risk stratification
🫘 Pathomics offers quantitative biopsy assessment
🔬 It may complement, but not replace, Oxford MEST-C
📈 Adding pathomics modestly improves IgAN risk prediction
🚀 AI may support more personalized nephrology!
🫘 Pathomics offers quantitative biopsy assessment
🔬 It may complement, but not replace, Oxford MEST-C
📈 Adding pathomics modestly improves IgAN risk prediction
🚀 AI may support more personalized nephrology!
🔬 Pathomics enables quantitative tissue assessment.
📊 Hölscher et al. (Nat Commun, 2023) identified 5 morphometric features linked to IgAN progression.
❓ Can these improve risk prediction?
🔗https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-36173-0
🔬 Pathomics enables quantitative tissue assessment.
📊 Hölscher et al. (Nat Commun, 2023) identified 5 morphometric features linked to IgAN progression.
❓ Can these improve risk prediction?
🔗https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-36173-0
🆕 Hey #NephTwitter!
Welcome to a new #tweetorial brought to you by @KIReports!
🫘 Can artificial intelligence improve risk prediction in IgA nephropathy?
🔬 Let's explore how pathomics could reshape kidney biopsy interpretation!
🆕 Hey #NephTwitter!
Welcome to a new #tweetorial brought to you by @KIReports!
🫘 Can artificial intelligence improve risk prediction in IgA nephropathy?
🔬 Let's explore how pathomics could reshape kidney biopsy interpretation!
👩⚕️ Our author: Andreea @manoleaandreea.bsky.social (Nephrology resident)
🔬 Our topic: Incorporating Pathomics Into IgAN Risk Prediction
🫘 Can AI-derived biopsy features improve risk prediction in IgA nephropathy?
🔗https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024926029402
👩⚕️ Our author: Andreea @manoleaandreea.bsky.social (Nephrology resident)
🔬 Our topic: Incorporating Pathomics Into IgAN Risk Prediction
🫘 Can AI-derived biopsy features improve risk prediction in IgA nephropathy?
🔗https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024926029402
🔬 Retrospective analysis of 555 patients with IgAN from the European VALIGA cohort
🖥️ Deep learning extracted quantitative features from digitized kidney biopsies
🎯 Pathomics was compared with Oxford MEST-C and the International IgAN Prediction Tool
🔬 Retrospective analysis of 555 patients with IgAN from the European VALIGA cohort
🖥️ Deep learning extracted quantitative features from digitized kidney biopsies
🎯 Pathomics was compared with Oxford MEST-C and the International IgAN Prediction Tool
🔬 Incorporating Pathomics Into IgAN Risk Prediction
Examining whether AI-derived biopsy features improve existing risk prediction tools in IgA nephropathy.
🔬 Incorporating Pathomics Into IgAN Risk Prediction
Examining whether AI-derived biopsy features improve existing risk prediction tools in IgA nephropathy.
🔬 Based on these findings, could pathomics become part of routine IgAN risk assessment?
🫘 Would you consider AI-derived biopsy features alongside traditional histopathology?
💬 Share your thoughts!
🔬 Based on these findings, could pathomics become part of routine IgAN risk assessment?
🫘 Would you consider AI-derived biopsy features alongside traditional histopathology?
💬 Share your thoughts!
🔬 Pathomics provides an objective, quantitative assessment of kidney biopsies
📊 It may complement conventional histopathology and modestly improve IgAN risk prediction
💡 A step toward more standardized biopsy assessment!
🔬 Pathomics provides an objective, quantitative assessment of kidney biopsies
📊 It may complement conventional histopathology and modestly improve IgAN risk prediction
💡 A step toward more standardized biopsy assessment!
🔬 Pathomics uses deep learning to extract quantitative features from digitized kidney biopsies
📊 It measures tissue structures, including glomeruli, tubules & arteries
🎯 Could it offer a more objective alternative to MEST-C?
🔬 Pathomics uses deep learning to extract quantitative features from digitized kidney biopsies
📊 It measures tissue structures, including glomeruli, tubules & arteries
🎯 Could it offer a more objective alternative to MEST-C?
#VisualAbstract by @DrPSVali
https://www.kireports.org/article/S2468-0249(26)02940-2/fulltext
#VisualAbstract by @DrPSVali
https://www.kireports.org/article/S2468-0249(26)02940-2/fulltext
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-9465974/latest
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-9465974/latest
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-9428731/latest
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-9428731/latest
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-7489138/latest
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-7489138/latest
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10232
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10232
🔗 Source: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.08.25337548
🔗 Source: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.08.25337548