新しい記事が投稿されました
セルプレスのCancer Cellの中国人編集長が著者から賄賂を受け取っていたと告発される。

		cell Press investigating ed...
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20261023225137
セルプレスのCancer Cellの中国人編集長が著者から賄賂を受け取っていたと告発される。

		cell Press investigating ed...
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20261023225137
セルプレスのCancer Cellの中国人編集長が著者から賄賂を受け取っていたと告発される。
>> Cell Press investigating editor-in-chief accused of soliciting bribes from authors. https://x.com/RetractionWatch/status/2112952215690207243 << 本庶佑…
anond.hatelabo.jp
October 23, 2026 at 1:51 PM
新しい記事が投稿されました
セルプレスのCancer Cellの中国人編集長が著者から賄賂を受け取っていたと告発される。

		cell Press investigating ed...
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20261023225137
セルプレスのCancer Cellの中国人編集長が著者から賄賂を受け取っていたと告発される。

		cell Press investigating ed...
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20261023225137
⚠️ Reminder to check before you cite.
More than 140 #osteoarthritis related studies identified on #retractionwatch that we should be aware of (see papers in comments)
oarsi.org/news/blog/im...
More than 140 #osteoarthritis related studies identified on #retractionwatch that we should be aware of (see papers in comments)
oarsi.org/news/blog/im...
An important reminder for the osteoarthritis research community: check before you cite. | Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI)
As researchers, clinicians and journal editors, we rely on the published literature to inform our work. However, publications may subsequently be retracted, and these changes are not always apparent w...
oarsi.org
October 21, 2026 at 10:02 AM
⚠️ Reminder to check before you cite.
More than 140 #osteoarthritis related studies identified on #retractionwatch that we should be aware of (see papers in comments)
oarsi.org/news/blog/im...
More than 140 #osteoarthritis related studies identified on #retractionwatch that we should be aware of (see papers in comments)
oarsi.org/news/blog/im...
Where are the #RaceRealists ? It does not appear that plagiarism and fabulism have genetic determinants.
youtu.be/Za5IfIbWNEk?... #MakingItUp #AlgorithmicDeterminism #YouTuberism #Branding #Performative #GainfulEmployment #YouCantHandleTheTruth #Gurubusters #RetractionWatch
youtu.be/Za5IfIbWNEk?... #MakingItUp #AlgorithmicDeterminism #YouTuberism #Branding #Performative #GainfulEmployment #YouCantHandleTheTruth #Gurubusters #RetractionWatch
Patrick Boyle: The Copy-Paste Professor
YouTube video by Gurubusters
youtu.be
September 25, 2026 at 2:19 AM
Where are the #RaceRealists ? It does not appear that plagiarism and fabulism have genetic determinants.
youtu.be/Za5IfIbWNEk?... #MakingItUp #AlgorithmicDeterminism #YouTuberism #Branding #Performative #GainfulEmployment #YouCantHandleTheTruth #Gurubusters #RetractionWatch
youtu.be/Za5IfIbWNEk?... #MakingItUp #AlgorithmicDeterminism #YouTuberism #Branding #Performative #GainfulEmployment #YouCantHandleTheTruth #Gurubusters #RetractionWatch
I was glad this point was covered by retractionwatch.
Whether the work was affiliated with the university cannot depend on it being retracted. Affiliation determines what research integrity committee has oversight; this should be no-takesy-backsies when things go south.
Whether the work was affiliated with the university cannot depend on it being retracted. Affiliation determines what research integrity committee has oversight; this should be no-takesy-backsies when things go south.
September 14, 2026 at 10:44 PM
I was glad this point was covered by retractionwatch.
Whether the work was affiliated with the university cannot depend on it being retracted. Affiliation determines what research integrity committee has oversight; this should be no-takesy-backsies when things go south.
Whether the work was affiliated with the university cannot depend on it being retracted. Affiliation determines what research integrity committee has oversight; this should be no-takesy-backsies when things go south.
Retractionwatch coverage of the retraction
@grinschglsandra.bsky.social @malte.the100.ci @jamiecummins.bsky.social
retractionwatch.com/2026/09/14/a...
@grinschglsandra.bsky.social @malte.the100.ci @jamiecummins.bsky.social
retractionwatch.com/2026/09/14/a...
CEO of AI company loses paper on cognitive impact of generative AI
A psychology journal has retracted a paper on how using generative AI can affect confidence in work tasks after its sole author refused to share data with the editors. The April paper, publis…
retractionwatch.com
September 14, 2026 at 9:32 PM
Retractionwatch coverage of the retraction
@grinschglsandra.bsky.social @malte.the100.ci @jamiecummins.bsky.social
retractionwatch.com/2026/09/14/a...
@grinschglsandra.bsky.social @malte.the100.ci @jamiecummins.bsky.social
retractionwatch.com/2026/09/14/a...
A good summary. For me the real tragedy is how this all kicked off. I'd say that was the article by Retractionwatch reporting that Arday (and Cam?) successfully prevented a publication in THE about his misconduct. That then enabled a white supremacist to fill that void and then the pile-on started.
August 25, 2026 at 9:52 PM
A good summary. For me the real tragedy is how this all kicked off. I'd say that was the article by Retractionwatch reporting that Arday (and Cam?) successfully prevented a publication in THE about his misconduct. That then enabled a white supremacist to fill that void and then the pile-on started.
Having said this this discussion is now so super polarised that one is either for or against. However, that was already mentioned in the initial RetractionWatch article which kicked it all off. MDPI is also a very dodgy publisher and a red flag itself.
pubpeer.com/publications...
pubpeer.com/publications...
PubPeer - Understanding Mental Health: What Are the Issues for Black a...
There are comments on PubPeer for publication: Understanding Mental Health: What Are the Issues for Black and Ethnic Minority Students at University? (2018)
pubpeer.com
August 22, 2026 at 11:55 AM
Having said this this discussion is now so super polarised that one is either for or against. However, that was already mentioned in the initial RetractionWatch article which kicked it all off. MDPI is also a very dodgy publisher and a red flag itself.
pubpeer.com/publications...
pubpeer.com/publications...
📢 听到Mei死亡的消息，田青简直不敢相信，她逐一检视推文IP，一度认为“是间谍来破坏中国罕见病的治疗推进”。2026年7月23日，学术期刊《Science》与科研诚信监测机构RetractionWatch联合发布了名为《致命反应（AFatal...
试药还是试命？罕见病治疗之路上的生死赌局 | 文学城
www.wenxuecity.com
August 21, 2026 at 4:53 PM
📢 听到Mei死亡的消息，田青简直不敢相信，她逐一检视推文IP，一度认为“是间谍来破坏中国罕见病的治疗推进”。2026年7月23日，学术期刊《Science》与科研诚信监测机构RetractionWatch联合发布了名为《致命反应（AFatal...
No.
About a week after this RetractionWatch investigation was published, Cambridge opened an investigation into Arday for academic misconduct. Arday resigned the same day. Maybe the investigation would have debunked it, but he resigned before it could.
retractionwatch.com/2026/07/27/c...
About a week after this RetractionWatch investigation was published, Cambridge opened an investigation into Arday for academic misconduct. Arday resigned the same day. Maybe the investigation would have debunked it, but he resigned before it could.
retractionwatch.com/2026/07/27/c...
Exclusive: News outlet killed story on plagiarism allegations after Cambridge prof hired law firm
Jason Arday In September 2025, Times Higher Education had a bombshell story in the works: A star sociology professor at the University of Cambridge had allegedly plagiarized parts of his Ph.D. thes…
retractionwatch.com
August 21, 2026 at 2:03 AM
No.
About a week after this RetractionWatch investigation was published, Cambridge opened an investigation into Arday for academic misconduct. Arday resigned the same day. Maybe the investigation would have debunked it, but he resigned before it could.
retractionwatch.com/2026/07/27/c...
About a week after this RetractionWatch investigation was published, Cambridge opened an investigation into Arday for academic misconduct. Arday resigned the same day. Maybe the investigation would have debunked it, but he resigned before it could.
retractionwatch.com/2026/07/27/c...
For the case of believing women primary authors are more likely to check their facts and avoid making unsupported claims, I present the RetractionWatch leaderboard:
retractionwatch.com/the-retracti...
retractionwatch.com/the-retracti...
The Retraction Watch Leaderboard
Who has the most retractions? Here’s our unofficial list (see notes on methodology), which we’ll update as more information comes to light: Joachim Boldt (240) See also: Editors-in-chie…
retractionwatch.com
August 20, 2026 at 7:45 AM
For the case of believing women primary authors are more likely to check their facts and avoid making unsupported claims, I present the RetractionWatch leaderboard:
retractionwatch.com/the-retracti...
retractionwatch.com/the-retracti...
verder hebben ze het echt over niemand die opde retractionwatch leaderboard staat, dus idd echt.
retractionwatch.com/the-retracti...
retractionwatch.com/the-retracti...
The Retraction Watch Leaderboard
Who has the most retractions? Here’s our unofficial list (see notes on methodology), which we’ll update as more information comes to light: Joachim Boldt (240) See also: Editors-in-chie…
retractionwatch.com
August 16, 2026 at 11:30 AM
verder hebben ze het echt over niemand die opde retractionwatch leaderboard staat, dus idd echt.
retractionwatch.com/the-retracti...
retractionwatch.com/the-retracti...
RetractionWatch seems to have some of this.
10 years after the downfall of a same-sex marriage canvassing study, tenure, some better practices — and an engagement
A study on how conversations can change minds grabbed headlines when it was published — and again five months later when retracted. “Gay Advocates Can Shift Same-Sex Marriage Views,” read the New Y…
retractionwatch.com
August 15, 2026 at 9:17 AM
RetractionWatch seems to have some of this.
#academiclibraries Husband just mansplaining Retractionwatch to me. I’m a retired academic librarian who latterly specialised in research support..
August 13, 2026 at 12:57 PM
#academiclibraries Husband just mansplaining Retractionwatch to me. I’m a retired academic librarian who latterly specialised in research support..
Retractionwatch: Tracking zurückgezogener wissenschaftlicher Artikel: http://bit.ly/tDuCDx (heise) via Jan Lüth auf G+
Retractionwatch
Tracking zurückgezogener wissenschaftlicher Artikel
bit.ly
November 23, 2024 at 4:04 PM
Retractionwatch: Tracking zurückgezogener wissenschaftlicher Artikel: http://bit.ly/tDuCDx (heise) via Jan Lüth auf G+
Secondo il sito retractionwatch il numero di papers sul covid-19 ritirati e' adesso superiore a 450, credo sia un record riguardo un singolo topic (peraltro cosi' recente nel suo complesso)
December 17, 2024 at 7:54 PM
Secondo il sito retractionwatch il numero di papers sul covid-19 ritirati e' adesso superiore a 450, credo sia un record riguardo un singolo topic (peraltro cosi' recente nel suo complesso)
New $300,000 grant marks the fifth anniversary of Retraction Watch <a href="http://retractionwatch.com/2015/08/03/new-300000-grant-marks-the-fifth-anniversary-of-retraction-watch/" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">http://retractionwatch.com/2015/08/03/new-300000-grant-marks-the-fifth-anniversary-of-retraction-watch/ via @RetractionWatch
New $300,000 grant marks the fifth anniversary of Retraction Watch
Five years ago today, we wrote our first post, “Why write a blog about retractions?” And although every year since has been terrific, this year we have the most to celebrate so far. Here are some h…
retractionwatch.com
November 8, 2024 at 9:11 AM
New $300,000 grant marks the fifth anniversary of Retraction Watch <a href="http://retractionwatch.com/2015/08/03/new-300000-grant-marks-the-fifth-anniversary-of-retraction-watch/" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">http://retractionwatch.com/2015/08/03/new-300000-grant-marks-the-fifth-anniversary-of-retraction-watch/ via @RetractionWatch
"Hello...Newman: Yet another sting pranks a predatory journal, Seinfeld-style" <a href="http://retractionwatch.com/2017/04/06/hello-newman-yet-another-sting-pranks-a-predatory-journal-seinfeld-style/" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">http://retractionwatch.com/2017/04/06/hello-newman-yet-another-sting-pranks-a-predatory-journal-seinfeld-style/ via @RetractionWatch
Hello…Newman: Yet another sting pranks a predatory journal, Seinfeld-style
Starting to get bored of stings designed to expose the well-documented flaws in scientific publishing? Yeah, sometimes we are too. But another one just came across our desks, and we couldn’t …
retractionwatch.com
November 8, 2024 at 4:47 AM
"Hello...Newman: Yet another sting pranks a predatory journal, Seinfeld-style" <a href="http://retractionwatch.com/2017/04/06/hello-newman-yet-another-sting-pranks-a-predatory-journal-seinfeld-style/" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">http://retractionwatch.com/2017/04/06/hello-newman-yet-another-sting-pranks-a-predatory-journal-seinfeld-style/ via @RetractionWatch
https://retractionwatch.com/2025/03/06/peer-reviewer-publishes-mistake-manuscript-rejected/ #scientificLiterature #retractionwatch
His manuscript was rejected. Then he saw it published by other authors
A chemist at a university in Pakistan found a surprise when he opened an alert from ResearchGate on a newly published paper on a topic related to his own work. When Muhammad Kashif, a chemist at Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, looked at the paper, he noticed “substantial overlap” with an unpublished review article he … Continue reading His manuscript was rejected. Then he saw it published by other authors
retractionwatch.com
March 8, 2025 at 8:19 PM
This site tracks retractions to academic papers. retractionwatch
Retraction Watch
Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process
retractionwatch.com
June 11, 2024 at 6:58 PM
This site tracks retractions to academic papers. retractionwatch
We think automated tools (which in metacheck are seldom genAI based), can help by collecting information that is either tedious to check (e.g., cross-referencing retractionwatch and pubpeer), or one might not know to check (e.g., completeness of power analysis reporting).
June 11, 2026 at 7:15 AM
We think automated tools (which in metacheck are seldom genAI based), can help by collecting information that is either tedious to check (e.g., cross-referencing retractionwatch and pubpeer), or one might not know to check (e.g., completeness of power analysis reporting).
Some of those modules cross-reference the DOIs from the reference section against external databases, like PubPeer, RetractionWatch, or FLoRA. RW and FLoRA databases are downloaded then checked, so no info goes to them. PP checking requires an internet connection to check for matching entries.
April 28, 2026 at 12:35 PM
Some of those modules cross-reference the DOIs from the reference section against external databases, like PubPeer, RetractionWatch, or FLoRA. RW and FLoRA databases are downloaded then checked, so no info goes to them. PP checking requires an internet connection to check for matching entries.