Rosie O’Donnell 9s just more of Trump’s non-substantive bullshit.
July 13, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Rosie O’Donnell 9s just more of Trump’s non-substantive bullshit.
Our taxpayer dollars at work... NOT doing anything substantive for us... The Taxpayer.
February 5, 2026 at 10:41 AM
Our taxpayer dollars at work... NOT doing anything substantive for us... The Taxpayer.
Drake never hit Kendrick with a single substantive bar that whole battle lmao
November 29, 2024 at 3:32 AM
Drake never hit Kendrick with a single substantive bar that whole battle lmao
Six year anniversary of this debate of substantive legal issues
September 4, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Six year anniversary of this debate of substantive legal issues
Nice to see the White House providing substantive responses to the critics…
April 15, 2025 at 1:59 PM
Nice to see the White House providing substantive responses to the critics…
Imagine if all the substantive things Donald could work on with the time he spends trolling us on social media.
(I’m kidding! He’s too stupid & incompetent to accomplish any substantive things.)
(I’m kidding! He’s too stupid & incompetent to accomplish any substantive things.)
April 13, 2026 at 8:16 PM
Imagine if all the substantive things Donald could work on with the time he spends trolling us on social media.
(I’m kidding! He’s too stupid & incompetent to accomplish any substantive things.)
(I’m kidding! He’s too stupid & incompetent to accomplish any substantive things.)
Along with the capitulation, this is the worst part.
The relentless focus on process and “bipartisanship” rather than articulating the substantive issues with the bill and articulating a substantive alternative
The relentless focus on process and “bipartisanship” rather than articulating the substantive issues with the bill and articulating a substantive alternative
The Senate Democratic Caucus was unified on a ‘clean’ one-month CR that would have kept the government open and given Congress time to negotiate bipartisan legislation. I’m disappointed that our Republican colleagues wouldn’t join us in that effort.
March 14, 2025 at 10:58 PM
Along with the capitulation, this is the worst part.
The relentless focus on process and “bipartisanship” rather than articulating the substantive issues with the bill and articulating a substantive alternative
The relentless focus on process and “bipartisanship” rather than articulating the substantive issues with the bill and articulating a substantive alternative
it is quite literally not ad hominem to say that you make arguments that are not grounded in anything substantive or material. a quick substantive question for you: does “illiberal left” have any meaning for you other than “people i don’t like?” by what metric are my views “illiberal?”
The funny thing is Bouie and the illiberal left who follow him respond to all criticism of left-woke excess with ad hominem, mobbing, and stigmatizing differing perspectives. They continue to behave in exactly the way that is generative of the ascendant woke-right backlash.
February 18, 2025 at 7:33 PM
it is quite literally not ad hominem to say that you make arguments that are not grounded in anything substantive or material. a quick substantive question for you: does “illiberal left” have any meaning for you other than “people i don’t like?” by what metric are my views “illiberal?”
not hard to find substantive conversation here if that's what you want
September 28, 2025 at 5:02 PM
not hard to find substantive conversation here if that's what you want
I think it’s frustrating that millions of Americans can come out in opposition to fascism and the media refuses to even acknowledge that substantive charge
March 29, 2026 at 1:33 AM
I think it’s frustrating that millions of Americans can come out in opposition to fascism and the media refuses to even acknowledge that substantive charge
They keep acting like the Trump-musk thing is a distraction from a more substantive issue but it IS the substantive issue! They’re literally fighting about the bill! Take the W!
June 6, 2025 at 12:02 AM
They keep acting like the Trump-musk thing is a distraction from a more substantive issue but it IS the substantive issue! They’re literally fighting about the bill! Take the W!
These contiguous posts in my timeline show how companies, both big and small, can either devote themselves to the trivial and evil or the substantive and good.
October 30, 2025 at 6:38 PM
These contiguous posts in my timeline show how companies, both big and small, can either devote themselves to the trivial and evil or the substantive and good.
buh buh you have to take him seriously and give him a substantive reply
no i don’t.
no i don’t.
February 23, 2025 at 4:21 PM
buh buh you have to take him seriously and give him a substantive reply
no i don’t.
no i don’t.
as far as i can tell, people are having substantive conversations about ezra’s interview with ta-nehisi, but then i’m not thomas chatterton williams, professional dilettante and, apparently, liar
September 28, 2025 at 4:41 PM
as far as i can tell, people are having substantive conversations about ezra’s interview with ta-nehisi, but then i’m not thomas chatterton williams, professional dilettante and, apparently, liar
The number of substantive things democrats can do while locked out of power is quite limited, but stopping this stuff is real and substantive and good.
Wow. Fourth batch of Byrd droppings is out - Dem staff absolutely dominated the HSGAC fight
We won on reorg & bonuses for cost cutters ofc, but also on at-will, filing fees, and USPS green vehicles & infrastructure sales
Seriously, major praise to the D staff
www.budget.senate.gov/ranking-memb...
We won on reorg & bonuses for cost cutters ofc, but also on at-will, filing fees, and USPS green vehicles & infrastructure sales
Seriously, major praise to the D staff
www.budget.senate.gov/ranking-memb...
“One Big, Beautiful Bill” Has More Provisions That Violate the Byrd Rule, According to Senate Parliamentarian | U.S. Senate Committee On The Budget
The Official U.S. Senate Committee On The Budget
www.budget.senate.gov
June 23, 2025 at 10:57 AM
The number of substantive things democrats can do while locked out of power is quite limited, but stopping this stuff is real and substantive and good.
Just wanted to say thanks to everyone here at Bluesky for the follows and the conversations and the constructive, substantive interaction. It's a great forum, a great resource for circulating and talking about the news, and -- most of all -- a pleasure. I'm grateful!
January 31, 2025 at 5:21 AM
Just wanted to say thanks to everyone here at Bluesky for the follows and the conversations and the constructive, substantive interaction. It's a great forum, a great resource for circulating and talking about the news, and -- most of all -- a pleasure. I'm grateful!
Take a second and think before posting the easy Eeyore reply. You might have something substantive to say instead. Or, even better, you can say nothing at all.
January 8, 2026 at 3:52 AM
Take a second and think before posting the easy Eeyore reply. You might have something substantive to say instead. Or, even better, you can say nothing at all.
Conclusion:
The Supreme Court’s decision was procedural, not a substantive endorsement of the Trump administration’s use of wartime powers.
The Supreme Court’s decision was procedural, not a substantive endorsement of the Trump administration’s use of wartime powers.
April 8, 2025 at 9:01 PM
Conclusion:
The Supreme Court’s decision was procedural, not a substantive endorsement of the Trump administration’s use of wartime powers.
The Supreme Court’s decision was procedural, not a substantive endorsement of the Trump administration’s use of wartime powers.
why should i make a substantive reply to an obvious dumbass? why should i waste my time? bsky.app/profile/tayl...
A substantive response to his post is both easy and possible Jamelle.
February 23, 2025 at 4:20 PM
why should i make a substantive reply to an obvious dumbass? why should i waste my time? bsky.app/profile/tayl...
Sen. Booker’s speech was a substantive and moral account of this moment. He did not read the phone book. He did not babble.
For 24 hours @booker.senate.gov laid out a detailed, damning, and critical narrative of truth, history, politics, morality, humanity.
What will you do?
For 24 hours @booker.senate.gov laid out a detailed, damning, and critical narrative of truth, history, politics, morality, humanity.
What will you do?
April 1, 2025 at 11:46 PM
Sen. Booker’s speech was a substantive and moral account of this moment. He did not read the phone book. He did not babble.
For 24 hours @booker.senate.gov laid out a detailed, damning, and critical narrative of truth, history, politics, morality, humanity.
What will you do?
For 24 hours @booker.senate.gov laid out a detailed, damning, and critical narrative of truth, history, politics, morality, humanity.
What will you do?
Are you listening? It’s the least you can do.
Powerful, substantive, passionate. A clarion call to stand.
www.youtube.com/live/rCUK2Vb...
Powerful, substantive, passionate. A clarion call to stand.
www.youtube.com/live/rCUK2Vb...
LIVE: Cory Booker speaks on the Senate floor
YouTube video by Associated Press
www.youtube.com
April 1, 2025 at 6:21 PM
Are you listening? It’s the least you can do.
Powerful, substantive, passionate. A clarion call to stand.
www.youtube.com/live/rCUK2Vb...
Powerful, substantive, passionate. A clarion call to stand.
www.youtube.com/live/rCUK2Vb...
“Trump signed a similar executive order in 2020!” isn’t actually a substantive rejoinder here. it’s barely relevant.
January 19, 2025 at 5:08 AM
“Trump signed a similar executive order in 2020!” isn’t actually a substantive rejoinder here. it’s barely relevant.
"the only way to win" [hurriedly commissions some push polls] "is to adopt all my substantive preferences on hot button cultural issues"
It's very funny that he pretends these aren't his personal views
July 17, 2026 at 7:31 PM
"the only way to win" [hurriedly commissions some push polls] "is to adopt all my substantive preferences on hot button cultural issues"
i've also given you multiple examples of substantive discussion, i suppose those don't exist?
September 28, 2025 at 5:08 PM
i've also given you multiple examples of substantive discussion, i suppose those don't exist?
Also, fwiw, people do seem to want substantive, slightly wonky analysis
May 19, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Also, fwiw, people do seem to want substantive, slightly wonky analysis