#Superdeterminism
Hey physicists, can someone explain superdeterminism to me in a way that doesn't make it seem crazy? I mean all of quantum foundations is crazy, but there's "this is weird but okay" crazy and "oh c'monnnnnnnn" and I feel superdeterminism is the second thing.
February 2, 2025 at 4:52 PM
According to superdeterminism I have no choice but to be a messy fat faggot
June 28, 2026 at 10:52 PM
coughing baby (copenhagen interpretation) vs hydrogen bomb (superdeterminism)
January 23, 2025 at 8:56 AM
A group of physicists say they can test superdeterminism with quantum computers. They're not totally wrong.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rym...
Quantum Computers Could Test Free Will, Researchers Claim
YouTube video by Sabine Hossenfelder
www.youtube.com
September 22, 2025 at 4:02 PM
copenhagen interpretation sigma cucks vs. superdeterminism giga chads
January 23, 2025 at 8:55 AM
I made a quantum foundations alignment chart — go forth and fight about it!

(also, "good" is not an endorsement)
August 30, 2025 at 9:27 PM
*superdeterminism
March 17, 2026 at 7:19 AM
But superdeterminism is surely silly Sabine?
September 24, 2026 at 5:04 PM
I wish I understood superdeterminism
May 19, 2025 at 5:29 PM
The core thesis of superdeterminism is that "you jinxed it" is a valid scientific critique
March 19, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Computers have those (rdrand), but they're only random insofar as nobody's backdoored it and superdeterminism isn't true
August 9, 2025 at 5:33 PM
2a) She says superdeterminism makes superluminal communication possible. This is extremely confusing to me. Superdeterminism is rejection of measurement independence not locality. It was specifically invented to save locality&realism simultaneously

This is her specialty, how can she get this wrong?
March 24, 2026 at 3:35 PM
Nice try. We all know it's actually just superdeterminism.
August 28, 2025 at 9:31 PM
I take it you're not into superdeterminism.
March 31, 2025 at 2:48 PM
that Nature article got me excited because when asked about what they think quantum mechanics means, like 2% of theoretical physicists said that they believed in something called 'superdeterminism' and I was like Omg have I found my people? but alas no it is just crank stuff with fake math yet again
August 2, 2025 at 5:06 PM
Ah, I see it's as I suspected: the "free will" being examined here is that under threat by superdeterminism (which denies free will by fiat). I was never too worried about that.
May 29, 2025 at 8:07 AM
Lookin through the raw data now, and praying that the 16 peopled who selected "superdeterminism" just clicked the wrong button.
July 31, 2025 at 9:09 PM
Is this a joke? You are telling *me* about superdeterminism? 😂
June 11, 2025 at 3:25 PM
Locality, causality, realism: One of these things is false.

Superdeterminism attempts to sidestep locality by saying that everything is predestined. How? Why? Don't have equations for that yet.
February 2, 2025 at 5:17 PM
I think the interaction with Daniel drove home the unifying theme of Sabine's problem: she simply can't or won't internalise anyone else's arguments

It always bothered me w/ string theory and particle physics and later superdeterminism but now I see the unity, even with the terrible economics
Sabine: "Academics can't give any good arguments scientific funding"

Daniel: *argues*

Sab: 🙉
March 4, 2025 at 6:26 PM
2b) She has previously come out in favour of teleology/backwards causation to try to salvage superdeterminism and I thought that was going to be her angle. I have no idea why she's now switching to superluminosity. Truly baffling to me.

As a Sabine connoisseur, this is a startling shift in position
March 24, 2026 at 3:35 PM
this is so fucking incredible

esp because she is literally not receving money to work on her superdeterminism models?? she's not affiliated with any grants or funded bodies, is she?
March 4, 2025 at 4:48 PM