public-interest-tech.com
10/
public-interest-tech.com
10/
Trials for lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and other diseases' vaccines are also underway.
but it’s hard not to look around and feel like all of the money and energy is being poured into making the world worse
No, you don't need to take 4000 level courses.
But it is important to understand technology, and more important *technologists.*
In what universe would an engineering student ever study history?!
Do many history students study engineering?!
I *enjoyed* history at school, and I was *good* at it. But no way would I ever have studied it at university.
No, you don't need to take 4000 level courses.
But it is important to understand technology, and more important *technologists.*
plato: NOW HOLD ON A MINUTE
plato: NOW HOLD ON A MINUTE
11. Pharmacists
12. Dentists
13. Physical Therapists
14. Occupational Therapists
15. Speech-Language Pathologists:
16. Respiratory Therapists
17. Radiologic Technologists
18. Clinical Laboratory Technologists
19. Diagnostic Medical Sonographers
20. Mental Health Providers
11. Pharmacists
12. Dentists
13. Physical Therapists
14. Occupational Therapists
15. Speech-Language Pathologists:
16. Respiratory Therapists
17. Radiologic Technologists
18. Clinical Laboratory Technologists
19. Diagnostic Medical Sonographers
20. Mental Health Providers
Trump just fired them. All of them.
consumerfinance.gov/about-us/blog/…
Trump just fired them. All of them.
consumerfinance.gov/about-us/blog/…
Cool, cool.
Their internal memo: “We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns.”
Let's look at it, then step back to evaluate how far we've come along a dangerous road and where that road might take us. 🧵
Ann is an author.
Her context is about usability, not technical capacity. On the merits of her context, she is correct.
Technical specificity does not change her conclusions.
Ann is an author.
Her context is about usability, not technical capacity. On the merits of her context, she is correct.
Technical specificity does not change her conclusions.
Counterpoint: technologists KNOW that many humans are idiots, and are thus *morally obligated* to design technological systems in ways that attempt to mitigate this universal problem.
except it’s doing it by straight-up killing people who rely on ChatGPT to plan dangerous trips, not by improving human cognition like the techbros want us to believe:
Counterpoint: technologists KNOW that many humans are idiots, and are thus *morally obligated* to design technological systems in ways that attempt to mitigate this universal problem.
3/
3/