Just asking. . . On Friday June 1st of 2012, I received an "electronic communication" aka email from the Unitarian Universalist Associ...

A law professor has criticized a legal theory proposed in a Trump-aligned amicus brief filed in a Supreme Court case regarding birthright citizenship. The argument, advanced by legal scholar Richard Epstein, suggests that the phrases 'subject to the jurisdiction' and 'within the jurisdiction' in the 14th and 13th Amendments have distinct meanings. Epstein's interpretation would allow foreigners to bring enslaved individuals into the U.S. as tourists, a concept described as 'slave tourism' by legal expert Paul Gowder. Gowder argues that Epstein's theory is both legally flawed and ethically problematic, as it could exclude undocumented individuals and tourists from birthright citizenship rights. While Epstein is a respected legal figure associated with conservative legal circles, Gowder dismisses his argument as 'completely nuts.' The Supreme Court recently ruled against Trump's attempt to limit birthright citizenship, but Epstein's brief remains a point of contention in legal discourse.

On July 25, the Sabin Center filed an amicus brief on behalf of the U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM) in support of the Plaintiff States in the case New York v. Trump.

Thousands of Harvard University alumni have signed on to a legal message of support for their alma mater, CNN has learned, an unprecedented effort to back the school as it challenges the Trump adminis...

We're urging the court to take up a case and protect vulnerable road users, who are disproportionally impacted by traffic violence.

YouTube video by Robert Gouveia Esq.

View the Amicus Brief Here By signing [this form/clicking submit/whatever method you are using], you authorize Kline & Specter to include your name and/or organization name on the list of signatories...

Key takeaways Een groep voormalige werknemers van OpenAI, vertegenwoordigd door professor Lawrence Lessig van Harvard, heeft een amicusbrief ingediend ter ondersteuning van de rechtszaak van Elon Musk tegen het bedrijf. De brief stelt dat de geplande overgang van OpenAI van een non-profit naar een for-profit structuur de oorspronkelijke missie van het bedrijf fundamenteel zou schenden. […]