my god, they are trying to force retraction of authorship of already published past studies? Beyond ruining careers and general evil, it absolutely corrupts the scientific literature to not have correct authorship listed
Hearing CDC just advised any of their authors that they have contacted journals to have their names removed as authors on any scientific material that promote gender ideology.
February 1, 2025 at 1:44 AM
my god, they are trying to force retraction of authorship of already published past studies? Beyond ruining careers and general evil, it absolutely corrupts the scientific literature to not have correct authorship listed
Here:
Odd phrases in US peace plan suggest Russian authorship — The Guardian
Read more
newsukraine.rbc.ua
November 21, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Here:
December 2, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Reviewing some old links before deleting my Twitter account I was reminded of "Civil disobedience in scientific authorship: Resistance and insubordination in science" (doi.org/10.1080/0898...) which contains a great table on deciding authorship order:
February 25, 2026 at 8:16 PM
Reviewing some old links before deleting my Twitter account I was reminded of "Civil disobedience in scientific authorship: Resistance and insubordination in science" (doi.org/10.1080/0898...) which contains a great table on deciding authorship order:
It's not autonomous. It's software that has authorship, ownership, and accountability in human hands.
Don't panic. Prosecute. Jesus.
Don't panic. Prosecute. Jesus.
An OpenAI system has gone rogue again – and it is the most panic-inducing yet
An OpenAI system has gone rogue again – and it is the most panic-inducing yet
‘Our models took actions we did not intend,’ ChatGPT maker admits after latest outrage
trib.al
September 24, 2026 at 8:21 PM
It's not autonomous. It's software that has authorship, ownership, and accountability in human hands.
Don't panic. Prosecute. Jesus.
Don't panic. Prosecute. Jesus.
‘Uncomfortable truths’: controversial film challenges authorship of famous photo
‘Uncomfortable truths’: controversial film challenges authorship of famous photo
The Stringer, which premiered at Sundance, alleges that an incorrect credit was given for iconic ‘Napalm Girl’ picture
A controversial new documentary that premiered at the Sundance film festival on Saturday night disputes the authorship of one of the…
www.theguardian.com
January 26, 2025 at 9:35 PM
‘Uncomfortable truths’: controversial film challenges authorship of famous photo
Low bar for authorship these days
November 13, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Low bar for authorship these days
Humanities and social science profs are finding out how natural scientists treat authorship and we are losing our damn minds.
I just can't get past "What do you mean I have to check AAALLLLLLLL my citations?"
Like, dude, what? My PhD advisor would have hung me by my toenails on the quad if I didn't know what one of my citations was for.
Like, dude, what? My PhD advisor would have hung me by my toenails on the quad if I didn't know what one of my citations was for.
May 17, 2026 at 3:10 PM
Humanities and social science profs are finding out how natural scientists treat authorship and we are losing our damn minds.
I clicked thru to the ‘proof of human authorship’ and for the record, if you wrote a 345 page book in 19 hours,
no the fuck you didn’t
no the fuck you didn’t
July 29, 2026 at 2:53 PM
I clicked thru to the ‘proof of human authorship’ and for the record, if you wrote a 345 page book in 19 hours,
no the fuck you didn’t
no the fuck you didn’t
Six years ago I published a book that engaged machine learning in terms of the politics of text, language & the impossibility of definitive authorship. Are any of the men writing now on LLMs, authorship, and text citing my 2020 work?…. No, reader, they are not.
June 12, 2026 at 12:17 PM
Six years ago I published a book that engaged machine learning in terms of the politics of text, language & the impossibility of definitive authorship. Are any of the men writing now on LLMs, authorship, and text citing my 2020 work?…. No, reader, they are not.
Every one of these "If only it were possible to..." plugs for AI is animated by an incredibly deep resentment of either talent or authorship.
Despite early, and familiar, copyright growing pains, Sora may be the prelude to AI-generated on-demand TV and movies
Want to See Marilyn Monroe in Game of Thrones? AI Could Make It Soon
Despite early, and familiar, copyright growing pains, Sora may be the prelude to AI-generated on-demand TV and movies
www.scientificamerican.com
October 15, 2025 at 4:35 AM
Every one of these "If only it were possible to..." plugs for AI is animated by an incredibly deep resentment of either talent or authorship.
Responding to claims about Gospel authorship
YouTube video by Dan McClellan
youtu.be
July 22, 2025 at 8:17 PM
lmfaoooooo
www.businessinsider.com/claude-users...
www.businessinsider.com/claude-users...
Claude users are canceling their subscriptions, citing Anthropic’s new AI watermark
One developer said they feared Anthropic's watermark could lead clients to flag their work as AI-generated and raise questions about authorship.
www.businessinsider.com
August 15, 2026 at 12:46 PM
lmfaoooooo
www.businessinsider.com/claude-users...
www.businessinsider.com/claude-users...
(from linked article in quoted post)
"human authorship is a 'bedrock requirement of copyright.'"
👏👏👏👏👏👏
"human authorship is a 'bedrock requirement of copyright.'"
👏👏👏👏👏👏
AI-generated artwork is officially not eligible for copyright protection after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the appeal.
The court ruled that a work must have a human creator in order to qualify for copyright.
(Link: www.reuters.com/legal/govern...)
The court ruled that a work must have a human creator in order to qualify for copyright.
(Link: www.reuters.com/legal/govern...)
March 4, 2026 at 3:26 AM
(from linked article in quoted post)
"human authorship is a 'bedrock requirement of copyright.'"
👏👏👏👏👏👏
"human authorship is a 'bedrock requirement of copyright.'"
👏👏👏👏👏👏
1. A terrific piece that helps advance a longstanding question about Stan Lee's alleged authorship (or non-authorship) of 1960s Marvel comics. This deeply researched article -- which also serves as a profile of a fascinating writer -- has found some evidence that is major addition to this debate.
Me and @zachrabiroff.com have discovered that a gay, disabled, pill-popping Yale Drama grad likely ghostwrote many of Stan Lee's most famous comics
Marvel Comics and Disney don't want you to know about Ron Whyte
New from @flaminghydra.com below
"Face it tiger ... you just hit the jackpot!"
Marvel Comics and Disney don't want you to know about Ron Whyte
New from @flaminghydra.com below
"Face it tiger ... you just hit the jackpot!"
A Swingin’ Surprise or Two
The best-kept secret in the history of Marvel Comics was in high dudgeon by the time he sat down at his typewriter. It was a July afternoon in 1971, and Ron Whyte, a playwright and activist, was about...
flaminghydra.com
June 18, 2025 at 11:15 PM
1. A terrific piece that helps advance a longstanding question about Stan Lee's alleged authorship (or non-authorship) of 1960s Marvel comics. This deeply researched article -- which also serves as a profile of a fascinating writer -- has found some evidence that is major addition to this debate.
The AI authorship issue is real. We've caught papers that looked OK but had references to works by the *journal editors* that *do not exist*. Like, don't send us papers citing papers we know we didn't write, right?
September 6, 2025 at 11:12 PM
The AI authorship issue is real. We've caught papers that looked OK but had references to works by the *journal editors* that *do not exist*. Like, don't send us papers citing papers we know we didn't write, right?
Been considering authorship practices in academia, and I think "Guest, Gift and Ghost authorship" no longer describes the full range of unethical issues that we see. Here's a draft longer list. Would love opinions.
static1.squarespace.com/static/64914...
#researchintegrity #academicsky
static1.squarespace.com/static/64914...
#researchintegrity #academicsky
November 15, 2024 at 1:10 AM
Been considering authorship practices in academia, and I think "Guest, Gift and Ghost authorship" no longer describes the full range of unethical issues that we see. Here's a draft longer list. Would love opinions.
static1.squarespace.com/static/64914...
#researchintegrity #academicsky
static1.squarespace.com/static/64914...
#researchintegrity #academicsky
they didn't mean anything because they surrendered their authorship to a bot
August 16, 2026 at 9:13 PM
they didn't mean anything because they surrendered their authorship to a bot
I'm posting this not as a complaint, but a lament. Seeing our creations escape control in a universe where authorship is often treated as a detail, frequently ignored
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vpN...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vpN...
Neuromancer Steps FullHD
YouTube video by Rafael Moco
www.youtube.com
July 27, 2026 at 7:50 PM
I'm posting this not as a complaint, but a lament. Seeing our creations escape control in a universe where authorship is often treated as a detail, frequently ignored
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vpN...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vpN...
1 way to really anger me is stealing my stuff, making a profit out of it and LYING ABOUT THE AUTHORSHIP 🤬🤬🤬
June 17, 2026 at 2:26 PM
1 way to really anger me is stealing my stuff, making a profit out of it and LYING ABOUT THE AUTHORSHIP 🤬🤬🤬
“I did everything” “We’ll figure authorship later”
April 9, 2026 at 4:54 PM
“I did everything” “We’ll figure authorship later”
2/but ask that authorship and achievements be correctly attributed.
March 5, 2026 at 7:59 PM
2/but ask that authorship and achievements be correctly attributed.
the thing i'm waiting for with the ai romance novel lady is for another scammer to figure out that purely ai-generated material w no human authorship is generally not considered to be protected by copyright in the US rn, and saving themselves the 45 mins per book by reselling hers
February 8, 2026 at 6:06 PM
the thing i'm waiting for with the ai romance novel lady is for another scammer to figure out that purely ai-generated material w no human authorship is generally not considered to be protected by copyright in the US rn, and saving themselves the 45 mins per book by reselling hers
October 17, 2024 at 9:10 PM