Stop Trump Coalition

Network wants to serve Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr after president sues over January 6 documentary

BBC chairman Samir Shah apologised for an ‘error of judgment’ over the editing of a speech by Donald Trump for Panorama.

Donald Trump Sues the BBC Over Editing His Jan. 6 SpeechIn a landmark legal battle, Donald Trump filed a lawsuit against the British Broadcasting Company (BBC) in response to criticism over their edited version of his Jan. 6, 2020 speech. The suit aimed to address concerns about defamation and media scrutiny. Heres an overview of the key developments:1. The SITUATION: Trump filed a lawsuit seeking $10 billion in damages from the BBC for their edits of his critical speech, which had criticized the U.S. governments handling of the 2020 election. His speech was widely disapproving and sparked criticism, leading the BBC to take action.2. The SUIT CASE: The case was initially dismissed by the UK Court of Appeal but eventually led to a settlement from the BBC, where they agreed to pay $10 billion. However, this amount wasnt sufficient to meet Trumps expectations, which he hoped to see an increase in media revenue.3. EVIDENCE ISSUES: The case faced challenges with weak evidence and lack of objective sources, making it difficult for the court to reach a conclusion. The BBC counter argued that necessary edits were made to convey his message effectively.4. CONSISTENCY AND IMAGE: Trumps side emphasized demands for media accountability, while the BBC argued for the accuracy and focus on key points in the edited speech. Public pressure contributed to ongoing scrutiny of their actions.5. BROADER IMPLICATIONS: The case reflects broader implications of political media handling criticism. It highlights legal battles affecting public perception and media standards, particularly in a context where bias is significant.6. CONCLUSION: The article concludes by noting the contrast between Trumps successful case and UK cases on similar issues, which were defended more leniently. This legal battle underscores the complexities of political media, where both accountability and image can conflict.------#News #BBClawsuit #donaldtrump #DonaldTrumpBBC #DonaldTrumpBBClawsuit #DonaldTrumpBBClawsuit$10billion #DonaldTrumpJanuary6speech #donaldtrumplawsuit #featured #January6speech #whatdidBBCdototrump #whyistrumpsuingBBC

via US news | The Guardian — President has sued the broadcaster for $10bn, claiming a documentary on 2021 Capitol attack led to financial harm Donald Trump’s legal team is making an 11th-hour attempt to block a court order that would grant the BBC access to the president’s financial records, as part of his multibillion-dollar lawsuit against the British broadcaster. Trump claims that the BBC’s 2024 documentary on the January 6 attacks have damaged the president’s business interests. In July, a Miami-based judge ruled that t

via The Hill News — The BBC is seeking to subpoena three members of President Trump’s family as it builds its defense to his $10 billion defamation lawsuit. In a Friday court filing, attorneys for the BBC argued that Trump’s children, Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump, as well as his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, “have personal knowledge and likely have…

President Donald Trump's family may face legal scrutiny as they become potential witnesses in a high-stakes lawsuit against the BBC. Attorneys Deanna Shullman and Howard Wasserman warn that Trump's family members could be required to produce communications with the president and undergo depositions, as the case revolves around allegations of defamation and unfair trade practices stemming from the BBC's 2024 documentary about the Capitol riots. The lawsuit claims the documentary caused extensive economic harm to Trump's brands, while the BBC demands access to his financial records to assess the validity of his claims. A court battle over disclosure of family trust assets has intensified, with legal experts debating whether Trump can separate personal reputation damage from business interests. Shullman notes that if the amended complaint focuses solely on non-economic damages like emotional distress, Trump might avoid certain discovery requests, but family members could still provide critical information about the case's truth claims. The situation highlights the complex interplay between personal and business interests in legal proceedings involving public figures.

via The Hill News — President Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen on Wednesday predicted that his old boss will drop his ongoing libel suit against the BBC, arguing there is “too much at stake.” “I don’t think this is a winnable case,” Cohen said on “The Dan Abrams Show” on SiriusXM. “I don’t think that this is a smart…

via US news | The Guardian — Judge issues temporary pause while he considers Trump’s request to revise his libel lawsuit against BBC A federal judge has temporarily halted an order requiring Donald Trump to turn over detailed financial information about his business empire to the BBC as part of an ongoing libel lawsuit. US district judge Roy Altman issued the temporary pause while he considers Trump’s request to revise and narrow parts of his lawsuit against the BBC over a 2024 documentary that aired in the UK. Continue rea

A U.S. federal judge has ruled that the BBC cannot relitigate the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot in its ongoing $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the broadcaster. The case centers on a 2024 BBC documentary titled 'Trump: A Second Chance?' which critics argue misleadingly edited Trump's Jan 6 speech to imply he incited violence. The judge, Enjoliqué Lett, clarified that while the BBC can examine public interpretations of Trump's remarks, the trial will not revisit the legal or factual aspects of the Capitol riot itself. The ruling comes after the BBC faced scrutiny for omitting Trump's call for peaceful protest in the documentary, which stitched together out-of-context remarks to suggest he encouraged violence. Trump's legal team accused the BBC of attempting to distract from its own alleged misconduct by expanding the case scope. The judge also ordered Trump to disclose financial records related to his businesses, a move that has drawn media attention. The BBC maintains its legal stance, arguing the case should be dismissed due to jurisdictional issues. This decision highlights the complexities of media accountability and legal interpretations of political speech in high-profile cases.

The BBC's $10 billion defamation lawsuit against former President Donald Trump is poised to challenge his attempts to use executive privilege to block testimony in a criminal investigation related to January 6th. The lawsuit, which seeks to unseal court rulings from former special counsel Jack Smith's investigation, highlights how federal courts have repeatedly rejected Trump's claims to shield witnesses from testifying. Between August 2022 and March 2023, five sealed proceedings rejected Trump's privilege assertions involving 14 witnesses. The BBC argues that allowing Trump to maintain these claims would be fundamentally unjust, as the courts have already invalidated them. U.S. Magistrate Judge Enjoliqué Lett has also ordered Trump to surrender financial records tied to over 400 companies. The case, which could impact Trump's legal defenses in the January 6th investigation, is set for trial in February 2027. Legal experts note that this development could significantly affect the scope of evidence available in the ongoing criminal proceedings against Trump.