My point would be, not whether he is controllable, but how usefulwould he be in gathering kompromat on other valuable "resources"?After all, you don't need to bring someone inside for them to beuseful, and if you can "push and pull" others into his circle to seeif they can be compromised, so that they, too, can be of use to youso much the better.    The objective in intelligence is not to only work with people whocan be trusted, but to devise ways to deal with untrustworthy people who are in positions where they move in various social,and/or, official circles.  Jeffrey Epstein was his own kompromatgenerator; if he could not be controlled by the threat of disclosure, that would be very unlikely in the extreme.    I'm sorry, but if this lady is really as skilled as she claims to be,then she is simply dissembling.  Even people who read spynovels know better than to believe what she is saying. The most valuable assets are the compromised peoplewho have little choice but to either comply with commandsor face being destroyed.    OMG, what is this woman talking about?  Jeffery Epsteinwould know as well as anyone that Intelligence agencies can play "above the law' games and "issue get-out-of-jail-free", cards when it is in their interest to do so, making them a tremendous, invaluable resource to anyone committing crimes that would ruin them if discovered.  For her to put this off as a mere "vanity" exercise on the part ofbeing full of himself is an absurdity beyond belief!    Any intelligence agency that knew what Jeffery was aboutcould not resist being involved with him in some way or other.To do anything less than that would be sheer incompetenceof breathtaking proportions.