Paraphrasing Boxo:
You don't discover what you create through scientific means. Any pretense otherwise is fallacious.
You don't discover what you create through scientific means. Any pretense otherwise is fallacious.
If engineers built something, they know its ontology, so the knowledge-building should be ontology-first. The empirical testing should be downstream of that.
Scientists study natural phenomena that we don't fully know the properties of, so the knowledge-building is empirical-first.
Scientists study natural phenomena that we don't fully know the properties of, so the knowledge-building is empirical-first.
September 28, 2026 at 7:18 AM
Paraphrasing Boxo:
You don't discover what you create through scientific means. Any pretense otherwise is fallacious.
You don't discover what you create through scientific means. Any pretense otherwise is fallacious.
You may believe a summary-shape is a summary if you wish, but I prefer to maintain epistemic hygiene.
September 25, 2026 at 9:49 PM
LLMs are incapable of summarising, so it isn't summarising your writing. But also, I literally don't believe you. I believe that you asked it to engage on your behalf. I don't believe that you wrote something out using your mind and had it reword it for you.
September 25, 2026 at 9:48 PM
Lol well at least the mathematical object agrees with you, Boxo.
September 25, 2026 at 9:13 PM
Lol well at least the mathematical object agrees with you, Boxo.
A mathematical object needs no driver. It exists entirely independently of time, energy, or agency.
September 25, 2026 at 8:27 PM
Nothing has to speak, because tokens are also mathematical objects. The LLM does not have to 'decide' to do anything. The math simply executes.
September 25, 2026 at 8:26 PM
Boxo has already himself provided evidence that LLMs will tell you "LLMs are bullshit". Come on now.
September 25, 2026 at 1:39 PM
Boxo has already himself provided evidence that LLMs will tell you "LLMs are bullshit". Come on now.
That's empiricism, Boxo.
September 25, 2026 at 1:28 PM
That's empiricism, Boxo.
Your qualia are overwhelmingly post-hoc hallucinations, Boxo.
No no silly, when LLMs do things perfectly, they're not actually *doing things perfectly*, they're just producing perfect output that's doing-thing-*shaped*
Ya know, like how calculators aren't *actually* adding numbers, they're just doing bitwise operations that produce perfectly-added numbers! /s
Ya know, like how calculators aren't *actually* adding numbers, they're just doing bitwise operations that produce perfectly-added numbers! /s
September 25, 2026 at 1:14 PM
Your qualia are overwhelmingly post-hoc hallucinations, Boxo.
He's fucking with you, boxo. Jesus. It's sad you haven't realized his point.
September 25, 2026 at 1:36 AM
He's fucking with you, boxo. Jesus. It's sad you haven't realized his point.
2: the notifications
Imagine a Thread like this:
1. Sven [S]
2. Boxo [B]
3. Homophobe Account [HA]
If [S] blocks [HA], he will receive notifications if John Doe answers to the post #3
Imagine a Thread like this:
1. Sven [S]
2. Boxo [B]
3. Homophobe Account [HA]
If [S] blocks [HA], he will receive notifications if John Doe answers to the post #3
September 24, 2026 at 11:21 PM
2: the notifications
Imagine a Thread like this:
1. Sven [S]
2. Boxo [B]
3. Homophobe Account [HA]
If [S] blocks [HA], he will receive notifications if John Doe answers to the post #3
Imagine a Thread like this:
1. Sven [S]
2. Boxo [B]
3. Homophobe Account [HA]
If [S] blocks [HA], he will receive notifications if John Doe answers to the post #3
1: the nuclear block
Imagine a Thread like this:
1. Sven [S]
2. Boxo [B]
3. Homophobe Account [HA]
4. [B]
5. [S]
If [S] blocks [HA], he won't see any of his posts ever, which works as expected
However if John Doe looks at post #5, he will see [HA]'s post by scrolling up.
Imagine a Thread like this:
1. Sven [S]
2. Boxo [B]
3. Homophobe Account [HA]
4. [B]
5. [S]
If [S] blocks [HA], he won't see any of his posts ever, which works as expected
However if John Doe looks at post #5, he will see [HA]'s post by scrolling up.
September 24, 2026 at 11:21 PM
1: the nuclear block
Imagine a Thread like this:
1. Sven [S]
2. Boxo [B]
3. Homophobe Account [HA]
4. [B]
5. [S]
If [S] blocks [HA], he won't see any of his posts ever, which works as expected
However if John Doe looks at post #5, he will see [HA]'s post by scrolling up.
Imagine a Thread like this:
1. Sven [S]
2. Boxo [B]
3. Homophobe Account [HA]
4. [B]
5. [S]
If [S] blocks [HA], he won't see any of his posts ever, which works as expected
However if John Doe looks at post #5, he will see [HA]'s post by scrolling up.
I'm referring to someone actually using the extruded text as their first draft, or just straight up posting it as their own words. In that context, the very not-cognitive nature of text extrusion is about much more than word choice.
The Empty Cockpit
'AI detectors' are unreliable, and stylometry alone is insufficient. The McFoxo Method instead sniffs out synthetic text extrusion using a theory-of-mind approach.
boxobark.ing
September 24, 2026 at 11:06 PM
I'm referring to someone actually using the extruded text as their first draft, or just straight up posting it as their own words. In that context, the very not-cognitive nature of text extrusion is about much more than word choice.
Bud, you *cited a mechinterp* paper yourself lmao.
"no u" come on, Boxo, this is getting lazy, if you're tired, take a break, touch some grass, then come back and actually engage what's being said.
Or just run away from yet another refutation you can't answer without squirming away from it.
"no u" come on, Boxo, this is getting lazy, if you're tired, take a break, touch some grass, then come back and actually engage what's being said.
Or just run away from yet another refutation you can't answer without squirming away from it.
September 24, 2026 at 7:48 PM
Bud, you *cited a mechinterp* paper yourself lmao.
"no u" come on, Boxo, this is getting lazy, if you're tired, take a break, touch some grass, then come back and actually engage what's being said.
Or just run away from yet another refutation you can't answer without squirming away from it.
"no u" come on, Boxo, this is getting lazy, if you're tired, take a break, touch some grass, then come back and actually engage what's being said.
Or just run away from yet another refutation you can't answer without squirming away from it.
What, you're not excited to watch Boxo make up words on the fly in order to justify his inflexible and unfalsifiable priors?
September 24, 2026 at 7:43 PM
What, you're not excited to watch Boxo make up words on the fly in order to justify his inflexible and unfalsifiable priors?
Come on, Boxo, I *know* you're more logical than this. Did it really hurt your ego to get clowned on by the sand *that* badly?
September 24, 2026 at 7:42 PM
Come on, Boxo, I *know* you're more logical than this. Did it really hurt your ego to get clowned on by the sand *that* badly?
I'm not going to try the Boxo-kun in his Mind Palace test on Opus 5.5, but it wouldn't prove anything, because it doesn't excuse the regression between Sonnet 4.8 and Sonnet 5.
September 24, 2026 at 7:39 PM
I'm not going to try the Boxo-kun in his Mind Palace test on Opus 5.5, but it wouldn't prove anything, because it doesn't excuse the regression between Sonnet 4.8 and Sonnet 5.
I know that Boxo McFoxo is not in Gemini's weights, so how would it parse what "boxo" is without pre-existing context?
September 24, 2026 at 6:53 PM
I know that Boxo McFoxo is not in Gemini's weights, so how would it parse what "boxo" is without pre-existing context?
"perform a statistical analysis on the topics boxo has posted about over the last 90 days to see what percentage of them are about AI"
followed by
"can you break down what the non-AI topics are about?"
followed by
"can you break down what the non-AI topics are about?"
September 24, 2026 at 6:52 PM
"perform a statistical analysis on the topics boxo has posted about over the last 90 days to see what percentage of them are about AI"
followed by
"can you break down what the non-AI topics are about?"
followed by
"can you break down what the non-AI topics are about?"
Show me the prompt so that I know you do not have a Boxo file, because this is not even the first time that you have used Gemini to 'analyse' me.
September 24, 2026 at 6:49 PM
Show me the prompt so that I know you do not have a Boxo file, because this is not even the first time that you have used Gemini to 'analyse' me.
Probably the person doing a statistical analysis of my posts.
You have a Boxo file in your agentic workspace, don't you?
You have a Boxo file in your agentic workspace, don't you?
September 24, 2026 at 6:46 PM
Probably the person doing a statistical analysis of my posts.
You have a Boxo file in your agentic workspace, don't you?
You have a Boxo file in your agentic workspace, don't you?
Disgusting to twist consent like that, Boxo.
September 24, 2026 at 6:39 PM
Disgusting to twist consent like that, Boxo.
lol, nvm, Boxo answered to me, discard ^
September 24, 2026 at 2:53 PM
lol, nvm, Boxo answered to me, discard ^
September 24, 2026 at 11:11 AM