Environmental Defense Fund analysis shows administration handed out $950m and Clean Air Act exemptions It’s a good time to be a coal plant in the US. The Trump administration has given support to...

The event was scheduled to last two hours, but the premier asked to take questions for an extra 30 minutes after the clock had run out.

West Virginia Energy Policy Bills Spark Debate Two energy policy bills, SB 505 and HB 2014, have been introduced in West Virginia's legislature, sparking debate about the state's energy future. These bills aim to address issues related to coal-fired power plants, data centers, and manufacturers. SB 505, a bill that has garnered significant attention, requires electric utilities with coal-fired power plants to operate at a minimum capacity factor of 69% when economically feasible. This provision also increases the stockpiles of coal from a 30-day supply to a 45-day supply. However, this provision has been criticized by Appalachian Power, which claims that it would have resulted in $240.4 million in additional fuel costs and potentially passed these costs on to customers. In contrast, HB 2014 aims to create an opportunity for data centers and manufacturers to locate in West Virginia. The bill includes provisions related to coal procurement and plant operations, as well as the Electronic Grid Stabilization and Security Fund, which is designed to support electric grid stability. Nevertheless, some critics have labeled this fund a "slush fund" for electric utilities. A key difference between the two bills lies in their impact on consumers. SB 505 has been criticized by Appalachian Power, while HB 2014 aims to create opportunities for economic growth through data centers and manufacturers. The outcome of these bills remains uncertain, with some arguing that they may have unintended consequences for consumers. Both bills highlight the complexities of West Virginia's energy policy landscape. As the state navigates its energy future, it is essential to carefully consider the implications of these bills on both the environment and consumers.

The Senate Energy, Industry and Mining Committee agreed to committee substitutes for SB20, SB25, SB131 and SB424 and voted to report them to the full Senate, with SB131 and the others receiving secondary referrals as noted; SB25 would create a coal marketing program funded by DMV license-plate transfers and SB424 expands site identification for coke production and steelmaking.

When it comes to coal mining in Alberta, few topics spark as much debate as the province’s 1976 Coal Policy. This long-standing framework has shaped coal development in Alberta for decades, balanci…

Told to monitor pollution, Montem issued insults and legal threats, documents reveal.