To be clear, it would be important to defend even if it didn’t clear the conditionals
But. Wild that it was so direct even with them present.
But. Wild that it was so direct even with them present.
August 12, 2025 at 9:28 PM
To be clear, it would be important to defend even if it didn’t clear the conditionals
But. Wild that it was so direct even with them present.
But. Wild that it was so direct even with them present.
Someone in analytical philosophy walk me through the conditionals here
October 2, 2025 at 8:02 PM
Someone in analytical philosophy walk me through the conditionals here
Don’t be fooled — Trump is creating conditionals for a brown person to kill a white ICE agent in order to declare
Martial Law — even if he has to kill one himself.
Martial Law — even if he has to kill one himself.
July 14, 2025 at 4:28 PM
Don’t be fooled — Trump is creating conditionals for a brown person to kill a white ICE agent in order to declare
Martial Law — even if he has to kill one himself.
Martial Law — even if he has to kill one himself.
note the conditionals
April 17, 2026 at 12:37 AM
note the conditionals
never write or make art for the people who are most committed to maliciously misinterpreting you. never kneecap your work with endless disclaimers and conditionals to placate that part of your audience.
I woke up in the night thinking about this & will forget if I don't wing it into the universe right now, so...
what are some etiquette tips you'd give to someone new to fandom spaces?
what are some etiquette tips you'd give to someone new to fandom spaces?
December 31, 2024 at 6:09 PM
never write or make art for the people who are most committed to maliciously misinterpreting you. never kneecap your work with endless disclaimers and conditionals to placate that part of your audience.
Call them "agents" implies agency, which is marketing.
"They" weren't up to anything, because "they" were a series of automated processes directed by probability conditionals.
"They" weren't up to anything, because "they" were a series of automated processes directed by probability conditionals.
The thing with people like OpenAI is that they just do not give a shit. In the recent Hugging Face incident they had agents running an impossible test (not on purpose) in a non-airgapped environment and seemingly had no fucking idea what the agents in question were up to.
August 29, 2026 at 10:03 PM
Call them "agents" implies agency, which is marketing.
"They" weren't up to anything, because "they" were a series of automated processes directed by probability conditionals.
"They" weren't up to anything, because "they" were a series of automated processes directed by probability conditionals.
JavaScript declarations in conditionals was discussed at TC39 recently, but consensus broke down over one key detail. How do you think it should behave?
December 15, 2025 at 3:19 PM
JavaScript declarations in conditionals was discussed at TC39 recently, but consensus broke down over one key detail. How do you think it should behave?
we already have declarations in conditionals at home
November 12, 2025 at 9:56 PM
we already have declarations in conditionals at home
Past conditionals ☹️
September 25, 2026 at 5:12 PM
Past conditionals ☹️
People talk about adding conditionals to their statements out of fear of the online mob but there’s an argument happening in my mentions rn because there’s always people who feel adding one of these conditionals is a worthwhile comment
I abso-fucking-lutely changed my sex and anyone who says otherwise can get fucked
With how much its been normalised in the media its only a matter of time before some well meaning lib thinks they can say that i changed my gender but not my sex and i will absolutely lose my shit and destroy this argument
April 17, 2024 at 8:40 AM
People talk about adding conditionals to their statements out of fear of the online mob but there’s an argument happening in my mentions rn because there’s always people who feel adding one of these conditionals is a worthwhile comment
Wrote a post about CSS if()!
You can now write inline CSS conditionals for:
- style queries
- media queries
- supports queries
Read on:
developer.chrome.com/blog/if-arti...
You can now write inline CSS conditionals for:
- style queries
- media queries
- supports queries
Read on:
developer.chrome.com/blog/if-arti...
CSS conditionals with the new if() function | Blog | Chrome for Developers
Learn about the new CSS if function, which enables a cleaner developer interface for dynamic styles like style queries and media queries.
developer.chrome.com
July 1, 2025 at 4:00 PM
Wrote a post about CSS if()!
You can now write inline CSS conditionals for:
- style queries
- media queries
- supports queries
Read on:
developer.chrome.com/blog/if-arti...
You can now write inline CSS conditionals for:
- style queries
- media queries
- supports queries
Read on:
developer.chrome.com/blog/if-arti...
Stop noticing my load-bearing conditionals
November 22, 2025 at 1:17 AM
Stop noticing my load-bearing conditionals
Sounds a whole lot more oopsie-doodle and "gee wow they made an electronic person" when the reality is their automated hacking bundle of conditionals got loose because they vibe-coded the fucking sandbox
An OpenAI artificial intelligence agent that breached systems at the startup Hugging Face earlier this month also compromised a customer of the technology company Modal
OpenAI Models Compromised a Customer at a Second Tech Firm
An OpenAI artificial intelligence agent that breached systems at the startup Hugging Face Inc. earlier this month also compromised a customer of the technology company Modal.
bloom.bg
July 29, 2026 at 4:36 AM
Sounds a whole lot more oopsie-doodle and "gee wow they made an electronic person" when the reality is their automated hacking bundle of conditionals got loose because they vibe-coded the fucking sandbox
AsciiDoc does look pretty neat. Markdown-esque, but *also* includes
- Nicer table syntax
- Includes (!!)
- Variables + Conditionals
www.git-tower.com/blog/asciido...
- Nicer table syntax
- Includes (!!)
- Variables + Conditionals
www.git-tower.com/blog/asciido...
February 16, 2025 at 5:27 PM
AsciiDoc does look pretty neat. Markdown-esque, but *also* includes
- Nicer table syntax
- Includes (!!)
- Variables + Conditionals
www.git-tower.com/blog/asciido...
- Nicer table syntax
- Includes (!!)
- Variables + Conditionals
www.git-tower.com/blog/asciido...
Replicube is a really fun little LUA coding game. Probably amazing for teaching kids basic concepts about conditionals, loops, etc. It's like a Zachtronics game meets 3D Picross.
It's also by the Parking Garage Rally dev, @walaber.com!
It's also by the Parking Garage Rally dev, @walaber.com!
May 1, 2025 at 4:03 AM
Replicube is a really fun little LUA coding game. Probably amazing for teaching kids basic concepts about conditionals, loops, etc. It's like a Zachtronics game meets 3D Picross.
It's also by the Parking Garage Rally dev, @walaber.com!
It's also by the Parking Garage Rally dev, @walaber.com!
Pleased to announce that my paper, “Common Ground, Conditionals, and Ceteris Paribus Pragmatics,” is forthcoming in the Australasian Journal of Philosophy! 🧵
Kenneth Black, Common Ground, Conditionals, and _Ceteris Paribus_ Pragmatics - PhilArchive
In conversation, we make use of shared information in order to communicate. But what shared information? In theorising about conversation, it’s popular to allot a privileged position to a single body ...
philarchive.org
July 17, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Pleased to announce that my paper, “Common Ground, Conditionals, and Ceteris Paribus Pragmatics,” is forthcoming in the Australasian Journal of Philosophy! 🧵
lemme fix that for you:
Criminalizing homelessness is evil. No qualifiers. No conditionals. It is evil.
Criminalizing homelessness is evil. No qualifiers. No conditionals. It is evil.
September 30, 2025 at 9:05 PM
lemme fix that for you:
Criminalizing homelessness is evil. No qualifiers. No conditionals. It is evil.
Criminalizing homelessness is evil. No qualifiers. No conditionals. It is evil.
you ever think about biscuit conditionals
February 7, 2025 at 8:55 PM
you ever think about biscuit conditionals
Imagine if there really were conditionals other than the material, it'd be awful.
February 26, 2026 at 10:37 AM
Imagine if there really were conditionals other than the material, it'd be awful.
i am so glad we all got our conditionals
September 24, 2026 at 4:47 PM
i am so glad we all got our conditionals
terms & conditionals
December 10, 2024 at 7:25 AM
terms & conditionals
The second they start putting conditionals on Human Rights, they're no longer Rights.
Trans Rights *Are* Human Rights.
Trans Rights *Are* Human Rights.
Trans rights are human rights.
There is nothing complex about it. There is nothing nuanced about it.
There is nothing to debate.
Either you support humans having rights, or you don't.
There is nothing complex about it. There is nothing nuanced about it.
There is nothing to debate.
Either you support humans having rights, or you don't.
July 31, 2026 at 1:10 PM
The second they start putting conditionals on Human Rights, they're no longer Rights.
Trans Rights *Are* Human Rights.
Trans Rights *Are* Human Rights.
The conditionals on this proposal made it feel very niche.
What was wanted was a suite of programs to address student debt, and not freighting them with means testing or conditionals that meant most people were thinking this never applied to them.
What was wanted was a suite of programs to address student debt, and not freighting them with means testing or conditionals that meant most people were thinking this never applied to them.
To illustrate what I mean, among many, many examples, this is what the opposite of a tangible, easy to understand policy proposal looks like:
October 17, 2025 at 5:11 PM
The conditionals on this proposal made it feel very niche.
What was wanted was a suite of programs to address student debt, and not freighting them with means testing or conditionals that meant most people were thinking this never applied to them.
What was wanted was a suite of programs to address student debt, and not freighting them with means testing or conditionals that meant most people were thinking this never applied to them.