The Supreme Court has redefined presidential immunity with far-reaching implications. Learn what acts are protected and which aren't in this landmark ruling. #PresidentialImmunity #ConstitutionalLaw #...

The Supreme Court is rubber-stamping every request for Christian special privileges.

Federal courts extended Second Amendment protections to switchblade knives and body armor, fueling optimism ahead of the Supreme Court's AR-15 case.

via The Hill News — Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed criticized President Trump on Sunday, saying the president has as much regard for the Constitution as “a piece of toilet paper.” In an interview with Al Sharpton on PoliticsNation, El-Sayed was asked about the numerous attacks made by the GOP and Trump about his family background and faith and how…

President Donald Trump's administration has shifted U.S. policy towards Ukraine, demanding new elections as a condition for continued support. Legal expert Professor David A. Super argues this move violates the Ukrainian Constitution and disregards Russia's ongoing existential threat to the nation. The policy raises concerns about democratic norms, international law, and the sovereignty of nations facing external aggression.

via BorderReport — Violations can carry up to five years in prison.

The court considered whether determinations that two current offenses constitute the same criminal conduct under the Sentencing Reform Act must be submitted to a jury under the Sixth Amendment. Defense counsel urged the court to overrule Markle and apply Apprendi/Erlanger; the state defended Markle and the SRA framework.

On Oct. 20 the Washington State Supreme Court heard arguments in State v. Jacob Sloan Herb about whether a defendant who was not told of a 30‑day appeal deadline — and who was told in a plea form that "no one can appeal a standard range sentence" — waived the constitutional right to appeal. The court took the case under submission.

At oral argument in State v. Duran, attorney Jerry Moberg told the panel the trial judge exceeded constitutional authority by ordering payment to a contract public defender outside of statutory appropriation, invoking separation‑of‑powers concerns and citing state spending clauses and Peralta precedent.

Introduction: This study analyzes the legitimacy of the Crown Princess’s appointment in Yogyakarta through the Sabda Raja decree and its alignment with Paugeran Adat, the customary constitutional...

Introduction: Constitutional ethics reflect the moral dimension that guides the administration of the state based on the cultural and historical values of the nation. Every country in the global...

White House sued over Jared Kushner’s diplomatic role in Trump administration by watchdog: A government watchdog sued the White House over Jared Kushner’s diplomatic role, alleging constitutional and ethics violations. #WhiteHouse #JaredKushner #TrumpAdministration #Ethics #ConstitutionalLaw

At the forum Judge Betty Sutton emphasized the need for judicial independence and said judges must make decisions based on the constitution, law and facts rather than political considerations.

At oral argument in In re NDD, defense counsel Josh Pease argued that the waiver statute (transcribed as "MCL 7 12 8.4") violates the jury-trial principles in Apprendi and related cases because juvenile-court factfinding increases the defendant's maximum permissible punishment.

Discover how courts determine if notice satisfies due process requirements and what steps must be taken to protect your constitutional rights. #DueProcess #LegalRights #ConstitutionalLaw