dds <- DESeq2::DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData, colData, design=~condition)
dds <- DESeq2::estimateSizeFactors(dds)
normalized_counts <- DESeq2::counts(dds, normalized=TRUE)
This is the gold standard for between-sample DE analysis.
dds <- DESeq2::DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData, colData, design=~condition)
dds <- DESeq2::estimateSizeFactors(dds)
normalized_counts <- DESeq2::counts(dds, normalized=TRUE)
This is the gold standard for between-sample DE analysis.
Thoughts: A heated debate and condemnation of NB by @noah_greifer. Seems term confusion is also an issue in the field.
#poisson #regression #negativebinomial #countdata #overdispersion
stats.stackexchange.com/questions/65...
Thoughts: A heated debate and condemnation of NB by @noah_greifer. Seems term confusion is also an issue in the field.
#poisson #regression #negativebinomial #countdata #overdispersion
stats.stackexchange.com/questions/65...
New to RNA-seq? You'll run:
dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData, colData, design = ~ condition)
dds <- DESeq(dds)
But 10 years in, you pause:
Are the replicates balanced?
Any hidden batch effects?
Should I use lfcShrink() before plotting?
New to RNA-seq? You'll run:
dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData, colData, design = ~ condition)
dds <- DESeq(dds)
But 10 years in, you pause:
Are the replicates balanced?
Any hidden batch effects?
Should I use lfcShrink() before plotting?
rb.codegen.enable()
results = rb.deseq2(counts_df, meta_df, design="~ batch + condition")
R> library(DESeq2)
R> dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData=counts, colData=metadata, design=~ batch + condition)
R> dds <- DESeq(dds)
R> res <- results(dds, alpha=0.05)
rb.codegen.enable()
results = rb.deseq2(counts_df, meta_df, design="~ batch + condition")
R> library(DESeq2)
R> dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData=counts, colData=metadata, design=~ batch + condition)
R> dds <- DESeq(dds)
R> res <- results(dds, alpha=0.05)
New to RNA-seq? You'll run:
dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData, colData, design = ~ condition)
dds <- DESeq(dds)
But 10 years in, you pause:
Are the replicates balanced?
Any hidden batch effects?
Should I use lfcShrink() before plotting?
New to RNA-seq? You'll run:
dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData, colData, design = ~ condition)
dds <- DESeq(dds)
But 10 years in, you pause:
Are the replicates balanced?
Any hidden batch effects?
Should I use lfcShrink() before plotting?
dds <- DESeq2::DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData, colData, design=~condition)
dds <- DESeq2::estimateSizeFactors(dds)
normalized_counts <- DESeq2::counts(dds, normalized=TRUE)
This is the gold standard for between-sample DE analysis.
dds <- DESeq2::DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData, colData, design=~condition)
dds <- DESeq2::estimateSizeFactors(dds)
normalized_counts <- DESeq2::counts(dds, normalized=TRUE)
This is the gold standard for between-sample DE analysis.
New to RNA-seq? You'll run:
dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData, colData, design = ~ condition)
dds <- DESeq(dds)
But 10 years in, you pause:
Are the replicates balanced?
Any hidden batch effects?
Should I use lfcShrink() before plotting?
New to RNA-seq? You'll run:
dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData, colData, design = ~ condition)
dds <- DESeq(dds)
But 10 years in, you pause:
Are the replicates balanced?
Any hidden batch effects?
Should I use lfcShrink() before plotting?
dds <- DESeq2::DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData, colData, design=~condition)
dds <- DESeq2::estimateSizeFactors(dds)
normalized_counts <- DESeq2::counts(dds, normalized=TRUE)
This is the gold standard for between-sample DE analysis.
dds <- DESeq2::DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData, colData, design=~condition)
dds <- DESeq2::estimateSizeFactors(dds)
normalized_counts <- DESeq2::counts(dds, normalized=TRUE)
This is the gold standard for between-sample DE analysis.
I want something that functions like tapply(countData, status, sum), and am currently doing a double for-loop
I want something that functions like tapply(countData, status, sum), and am currently doing a double for-loop