Peace with Lebanon and Syria seems possible. The control and investigation of crimes by settlers follwed by return of property in West-Bank will need to follow. In Gaza an international force with full disarmement and well planned rebuilding seems the only viable option.
3/3

And
Unite for, Will, Organize #Hezbollah disarmement, closely with #LEBANON democratic forces!!

#IRAK #SYRIA #LEBANON are historically LINKED to 🇪🇺
Not to mad, senile, greedy 🇺🇸 #MAGAMORONS

🤬😞

Not honoring the Budapest memorandum where Ukraine were given security guarantees in exchange for nuclear disarmement were the first major mistake. And now all the Maga crazyness that has too much support to be assumed to end when Trump dies of old age.

As for Russia, I honestly think it would be better to wait for Putin (and Trump) to die, then resume disarmement talks (as during Obama precidency) - China/India (India - Pakistan 🙄) needs to do the same though.
Europe will gladly join.
Israel? who knows 🤷‍♂️

Roy Hattersley persuaded the Labour Party to back multilateral disarmement instead of unilateral.

Hattersley died yesterday. Multilateral disarmement has been dying a slow death since 1996.

If we want a world without weapons of mass destruction, someone must take the lead.

The threat of imminent nuclear war was leveraged because of access to one (1) strait. Hormuz is bigger and larger than the thread on which we are all treading because of the scale of human madness.

A reminder one of the core elements that formed international institutions was nuclear disarmement

it's the lib dems of nukes policy! just like their whole "we can't have 4 subs because that's what we have right now, but disarmement is too far... what about having 2 subs?"

100% in agreement!
BUT then ALL countries with nuclear weapons MUST disarm and dismantle military nuclear facilities, and I doubt seriously that such a total disarmement will happen, not even by military force, a treaty is volontarily so it'll be very difficult to achieve.
There can not be one or>

Extracts Canadian PM speech on international order wrecked by Trump and Putin, not defended by China either

Stuff for reflection
Like rejecting act of Performing sovereignty to cover submission, or continue working with international institutions to build something new

Global disarmement campaign?

He has said that the ideal scenario is nuclear disarmement in line with other nations but acknowledging that is complex and unlikely. In terms of policy it isn't to simply get rid of it but to work towards it. The options you've given don't have to be exclusive - one can lead to the other

While we're doing clarity, is your position

1) unilateral nuclear disarmement

or

2) maintaining a nuclear deterrent but buying the bits from someone else/making them ourselves

Both perfectly valid positions. Both very different positions. So which one is your policy?

I want TOTAL DISARMEMENT of the civilian population!!!

No guns should be in the hands of the populace AT. ALL!!

there's no perfect institution, no ideal alliance

But there're some/many w a positif intention:
Let's develop, instead of making all new again & again🙏

Peace & diplomacy is also NATO's aim; concerning ☢️deterrence strat: de-inventing inventions is tough & disarmement now a blink too soon; afterwrds

This recognition would happen without demanding the dismantling and disarmement of hamas ?

Incredibly sad

And the best and lasting security/ peace guarantee if a deal, will be near complete disarmement on both sides.

With Putin that will not be happening

There is only one valueable security guarantee for Ukraine: Complete (nuclear and conventional) disarmement and territorial disintegration of Russia.