the system just like, fundamentally doesn't work lol
It has now been removed.
It has now been removed.
tinyurl.com/yfrbx344
tinyurl.com/yfrbx344
The question here is the effectiveness, efficiency, and equitability of that management.
I’d prefer the kind where as few disasters— namely the death and destruction parts— happen.
The question here is the effectiveness, efficiency, and equitability of that management.
I’d prefer the kind where as few disasters— namely the death and destruction parts— happen.
Because sticking up for what’s right against misinformed and/or awful people, they’ll be upset at boundaries and demands for equitability and well… tough, deny the harm until they evolve for your principles.
Because sticking up for what’s right against misinformed and/or awful people, they’ll be upset at boundaries and demands for equitability and well… tough, deny the harm until they evolve for your principles.
Reader, I did the actual math, and I genuinely don’t think they know what equitable means LMAO
Reader, I did the actual math, and I genuinely don’t think they know what equitable means LMAO
He isn't aiming for a common-owned means of production, with profits distributed equitability.
Instead, it's further concentrating the wealth in the hands of a few. While we already have one of the worst income inequalities.
the goal here isn't a sovereign wealth fund it's Putin's Russia
He isn't aiming for a common-owned means of production, with profits distributed equitability.
Instead, it's further concentrating the wealth in the hands of a few. While we already have one of the worst income inequalities.
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/16/u...
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/16/u...
thetyee.ca/Opinion/2026...