Bastin, J. F. et al. The global tree restoration potential. Science 365, 76–79 (2019). Windisch, M. G. et al. Prioritizing forestation based on biogeochemical and local biogeophysical impacts. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 867–871 (2021). IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 43–50 (WMO, 2018). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 (FAO, 2016). Keenan, R. J. et al. Dynamics of global forest area: results from the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. For. Ecol. Manag. 352, 9–20 (2015). Busch, J. et al. Cost-effectiveness of natural forest regeneration and plantations for climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 996–1002 (2024). Austin, K. G. et al. The economic costs of planting, preserving, and managing the world’s forests to mitigate climate change. Nat. Commun. 11, 5946 (2020). Hayman, G. Forestation is not an easy fix. Science 383, 833–834 (2024). Hua, F. Y. et al. The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches. Science 376, 839–844 (2022). Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (IPCC, 2003). Bahram, M. et al. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 560, 233–237 (2018). Yao, L. et al. Carbon sequestration potential of tree planting in...

Grow green forests by drawing a continuous line through all the cells in each level. Sophisticated levels and sudden secrets await you in this puzzle that could seem simple at first impression!

Lawmakers want to know why a Brazilian-owned company got payments from a program aimed to help American farmers weather President Trump’s trade war.

YouTube video by Retro S Gamer

Concerning in-boundary carbon removals, all 103 Mission Cities (Fig. 2a) intend to implement land-based temporary carbon sinks, with carbon sequestration being either the prime intention or a co-benefit (Methods). The most common practice is urban revegetation and greening (98% of the cities), followed by soil carbon sequestration (84%) and forms of forestation or improved forest management (80%), sometimes combined with silvicultural practices (23%) and/or agroforestry (19%) (Fig. 2b). The use of forested material to enhance or protract the carbon sequestration is scarcely intended by Mission Cities, with timber in construction and other bio-based products mentioned by only 16% and 13% of them. Terrestrial wetlands restoration and blue carbon practices (including marine wetlands restoration) are considered by 28% and 33% of the cities, encompassing all coastal cities. Commonly, Mission Cities combine three or four temporary CDR options (52%). Best practices include land planning provisions to protect local green from urbanization pressures, plans for carbon buffers as reserves within sequestration projects (Dunkirk and Zagreb) and provisions to maintain the health and ecosystem services of urban greening (for example, 20 cities refer to irrigation or similar; Supplementary Information). Some cities pay attention to tree and plant species (Mannheim, Zaragoza, Lahti, Paris and Glasgow)...

Forestation over Europe triggers substantial local and downwind precipitation changes, according to results from an observation-based continental-scale statistical model.