By M.Brosh Author of Cassandra's Shadow For far too long, Western commentators and leaders have stubbornly refused to recognize the new geopolitical reality.

Amid the war in Ukraine, as well as various geopolitical turbulences that threaten to fundamentally change the current global order, Kazakhstan is aiming to

Now the question arises: Will Putin, who met with Erdoğan 69 times (24 in-person and 45 via phone) in the three years following the July 15 coup attempt,

LISTEN NOW | In the aftermath of the dust-up in the Oval Office between Vlodomyr Zelenskyy, President Trump, and Vice President Vance, I find it stunning that so many, quick to their opinions, can be ...

The article details comments by an Israeli minister regarding the country's strategic stance in the ongoing U.S.-Iran conflict. The minister suggests that Israel benefits from allowing the United States to bear the brunt of military confrontation with Iran, while Israel maintains a position of non-involvement. This perspective is analyzed within the context of regional geopolitics, where Israel seeks to balance its security interests with broader Middle Eastern dynamics. The piece highlights the minister's assertion that Israel's strategic patience allows it to avoid direct engagement in conflicts that could escalate beyond its control. It also references recent casualties from airstrikes and the broader implications for international relations. The summary underscores the complex interplay between national interests, military strategy, and diplomatic considerations in the region. Key points include the minister's rationale for non-involvement, the impact of U.S. military actions on regional stability, and the potential consequences for Israel's security posture. The article emphasizes how such strategic decisions reflect broader geopolitical calculations rather than isolated events.

The United States is set to assume majority control over a significant portion of Venezuela's vast oil reserves, marking an unprecedented geopolitical move. This strategy aims to establish the world's second-largest private oil company by reserves and ensure long-term American energy security. President Donald Trump announced the plan via his social media platform, framing it as part of a broader effort to counter China's growing influence in the Western Hemisphere. The decision aligns with a revival of the 19th-century Monroe Doctrine, which historically asserted US dominance over Latin America. Analysts note this move could reshape global oil markets, as Venezuela's reserves are among the largest in the world. While proponents argue it strengthens American energy independence, critics warn of potential economic and political instability in Venezuela. The arrangement also raises questions about environmental impacts and labor rights in the region. This development underscores the intensifying competition for energy resources amid shifting global power dynamics.

The article explores Ukraine's transformation into a military subcontractor for Western powers, expanding its role beyond defending against Russia. It details accusations of Kyiv attacking an Iranian commercial vessel in the Caspian Sea, supporting armed groups in Africa’s Sahel to undermine sovereign governments, and collaborating with forces linked to Al Qaeda in Syria. The piece examines Ukraine's history as a U.S.-backed proxy since 2014, including the 2014 coup, rise of far-right movements, and the unpunished Odessa massacre. It highlights political repression, banned opposition parties, and forced military conscription to replenish Kyiv’s depleted forces. The narrative argues that Washington never viewed Ukraine as a democracy but as a strategic weapon against Russia, with Kyiv now seeking to prove its value by aligning with U.S. and European campaigns against Iran, Syria, and African states. This has created a widening conflict architecture where Ukrainian lives are sacrificed for Western geopolitical interests, framing Ukraine as an imperial enforcer rather than a sovereign nation.

The article examines the diminishing effectiveness of military power in contemporary conflicts, using case studies from Ukraine, Gaza, and Iran. It argues that technological advancements and asymmetric resistance have rendered traditional military dominance less decisive. In Ukraine, despite overwhelming firepower, Russia's objectives remain unmet. In Gaza, Israel's two-year campaign failed to eliminate Hamas, raising questions about the utility of sheer military might. Similarly, Iran's nuclear program persists despite U.S.-Israeli strikes, highlighting the ethical and strategic dilemmas of disproportionate force. The piece critiques the overreliance on military solutions, emphasizing the need for diplomatic and economic strategies. It also addresses the unintended consequences of warfare, such as civilian casualties and infrastructure destruction, which often undermine military objectives. The author concludes that the era of unchallenged military supremacy is waning, urging a reevaluation of geopolitical strategies in an increasingly complex global landscape.

The latest U.S. strikes on Iran have put one of Donald Trump’s defining promises under pressure. He returned to the White House insisting that America could no longer keep paying for other countries’ ...

VILNIUS, Lithuania - As NATO countries, including Germany, prepare to invest billions in military spending, an expert with extensive experience in the Ukraine conflict warns of potential pitfalls. Jon

General Petraeus told the Washington State Investment Board that lessons from Ukraine — especially the dominance of unmanned systems — are reshaping modern warfare, and he warned the Gulf blockade is depriving Iran of critical revenue with broad strategic and economic effects.

Calls for Dogar Pradesh expose deep communal, political, and economic fractures between Jammu and Kashmir after 2019.