Lol immediate unfollow, but also it’s very funny to me that Lyman Stone is now doing AI-assisted biblical inerrancy posting
September 30, 2026 at 4:32 PM
Lol immediate unfollow, but also it’s very funny to me that Lyman Stone is now doing AI-assisted biblical inerrancy posting
She argues that he was very influenced in particular by the liberal Anglican theologian and churchman Charles Gore. This comes through in his rejection of inerrancy and fundamentalism.
September 30, 2026 at 2:57 PM
She argues that he was very influenced in particular by the liberal Anglican theologian and churchman Charles Gore. This comes through in his rejection of inerrancy and fundamentalism.
Yes. On the next page 👇
“Inerrancy may not have been able to grant evangelicals the unadulterated interpretive and epistemic certainty its proponents desired, but in the end, it gave them something just as powerful. It gave them a weapon.”
That last sentence…
“Inerrancy may not have been able to grant evangelicals the unadulterated interpretive and epistemic certainty its proponents desired, but in the end, it gave them something just as powerful. It gave them a weapon.”
That last sentence…
September 29, 2026 at 3:06 AM
Yes. On the next page 👇
“Inerrancy may not have been able to grant evangelicals the unadulterated interpretive and epistemic certainty its proponents desired, but in the end, it gave them something just as powerful. It gave them a weapon.”
That last sentence…
“Inerrancy may not have been able to grant evangelicals the unadulterated interpretive and epistemic certainty its proponents desired, but in the end, it gave them something just as powerful. It gave them a weapon.”
That last sentence…
“Now, forty years later, we might be forgiven for asking, What if we do not come to the same conclusion? What if our interpretation differs from that of these 250 predominately white, American men?”
“Desiring Certainty: The Making of Biblical Inerrancy” Jason A. Hentschel, pgs. 147, 149-150
“Desiring Certainty: The Making of Biblical Inerrancy” Jason A. Hentschel, pgs. 147, 149-150
September 29, 2026 at 12:54 AM
“Now, forty years later, we might be forgiven for asking, What if we do not come to the same conclusion? What if our interpretation differs from that of these 250 predominately white, American men?”
“Desiring Certainty: The Making of Biblical Inerrancy” Jason A. Hentschel, pgs. 147, 149-150
“Desiring Certainty: The Making of Biblical Inerrancy” Jason A. Hentschel, pgs. 147, 149-150
I was thinking the other day that a more talmudic tradition of commentary on the text throughout the millennia would have a better result than biblical inerrancy + storefront evangelicalism
September 28, 2026 at 4:13 PM
I was thinking the other day that a more talmudic tradition of commentary on the text throughout the millennia would have a better result than biblical inerrancy + storefront evangelicalism
Recovering (or Not) from Inerrancy: Two Stories scotmcknight.substack.com/p/recovering...
Recovering (or Not) from Inerrancy: Two Stories
In Jason Hentschel’s new book, Desiring Certainty: The Making of Biblical Inerrancy (Eerdmans!), two major stories are told.
scotmcknight.substack.com
September 24, 2026 at 8:30 PM
Recovering (or Not) from Inerrancy: Two Stories scotmcknight.substack.com/p/recovering...
I've seen people distinguishing between Christians and Christian nationalists. I don't
Christianity is a war/blood cult. If you believe in the inerrancy of the Bible you can justify the most atrocious behavior in the "Name of the Lord."
All Christians believe some of the myths else why bother?
Christianity is a war/blood cult. If you believe in the inerrancy of the Bible you can justify the most atrocious behavior in the "Name of the Lord."
All Christians believe some of the myths else why bother?
September 24, 2026 at 1:49 PM
I've seen people distinguishing between Christians and Christian nationalists. I don't
Christianity is a war/blood cult. If you believe in the inerrancy of the Bible you can justify the most atrocious behavior in the "Name of the Lord."
All Christians believe some of the myths else why bother?
Christianity is a war/blood cult. If you believe in the inerrancy of the Bible you can justify the most atrocious behavior in the "Name of the Lord."
All Christians believe some of the myths else why bother?
Inerrancy of the Bible except for how bats are birds? Inerrancy of the Bible except for if Joseph isn't Jesus' dad why does his pedigree go on for pages? Can't even keep the timeline of the crucifixion straight and I could just keep on going...
September 23, 2026 at 7:30 PM
Inerrancy of the Bible except for how bats are birds? Inerrancy of the Bible except for if Joseph isn't Jesus' dad why does his pedigree go on for pages? Can't even keep the timeline of the crucifixion straight and I could just keep on going...
Inerrancy of the Bible except for every time the word wine is used they mean grape juice?
I might be from the South.
I might be from the South.
September 23, 2026 at 7:22 PM
Inerrancy of the Bible except for every time the word wine is used they mean grape juice?
I might be from the South.
I might be from the South.
They do believe in the inerrancy of the Bible though and I have a very long list of why that is a bad idea
September 23, 2026 at 7:21 PM
They do believe in the inerrancy of the Bible though and I have a very long list of why that is a bad idea
IS THE KJV BIBLE THE INERRANT WORD OF GOD? -- a Bill's Bible Basics series
#KJVBible #Inerrant #Infallible
This Bill’s Bible Basics 8-part series can be read at: https://www.billkochman.com/Articles/index-new.html
#KJVBible #Inerrant #Infallible
This Bill’s Bible Basics 8-part series can be read at: https://www.billkochman.com/Articles/index-new.html
September 23, 2026 at 1:10 AM
IS THE KJV BIBLE THE INERRANT WORD OF GOD? -- a Bill's Bible Basics series
#KJVBible #Inerrant #Infallible
This Bill’s Bible Basics 8-part series can be read at: https://www.billkochman.com/Articles/index-new.html
#KJVBible #Inerrant #Infallible
This Bill’s Bible Basics 8-part series can be read at: https://www.billkochman.com/Articles/index-new.html
So I would argue accepting textual criticism and science like Evolution does not actually threaten a belief in a monotheistic God whatsoever what it does threaten is crazy fringe beliefs like the inerrancy of the Bible which is just patently ridiculous nonsense.
September 21, 2026 at 11:15 PM
So I would argue accepting textual criticism and science like Evolution does not actually threaten a belief in a monotheistic God whatsoever what it does threaten is crazy fringe beliefs like the inerrancy of the Bible which is just patently ridiculous nonsense.
Reading @kkdumez.bsky.social's new book something clicked for me about my first spiritual formation. I long knew about the roles of dispensationalism and inerrancy, but Live Laugh Love revealed a third missing piece...
My Missing Piece - A Review of “Live Laugh Love” by Kristin Kobes Du Mez — NAB in Brazil
I’ll leave it to female readers to reflect on their experiences as Du Mez tracks what it means to be a totally fascinating woman, the curious life of Elisabeth Elliot, Multi-Level Marketing friendship...
www.nabinbrazil.org
September 21, 2026 at 6:08 PM
Reading @kkdumez.bsky.social's new book something clicked for me about my first spiritual formation. I long knew about the roles of dispensationalism and inerrancy, but Live Laugh Love revealed a third missing piece...
Nun, das Bekenntnis von Westminster spricht nicht von Inerrancy, sondern klassisch davon, dass die Heilige Schrift "all things necessary" enthält. Die Fundamentals berufen sich für die Bezeichnung als "without error" auf einen Beschluss der Presbyterian Church von 1893.
September 18, 2026 at 12:11 PM
Nun, das Bekenntnis von Westminster spricht nicht von Inerrancy, sondern klassisch davon, dass die Heilige Schrift "all things necessary" enthält. Die Fundamentals berufen sich für die Bezeichnung als "without error" auf einen Beschluss der Presbyterian Church von 1893.
trotzdem nicht nichts dass es diese verbale überschneidung gibt...
September 18, 2026 at 10:16 AM
trotzdem nicht nichts dass es diese verbale überschneidung gibt...
chicago statement on biblical inerrancy that is, not to be confused mit der chicago declaration on evangelical social concern
September 18, 2026 at 9:52 AM
chicago statement on biblical inerrancy that is, not to be confused mit der chicago declaration on evangelical social concern
It's biblical inerrancy for libs with Poster's Madness
September 13, 2026 at 11:49 PM
It's biblical inerrancy for libs with Poster's Madness
Christians have known it’s mythical for a long time. Only recently did they start calling for its inerrancy.
September 13, 2026 at 7:29 PM
Christians have known it’s mythical for a long time. Only recently did they start calling for its inerrancy.
You can leave fundamentalism and still hold onto it psychologically.
You can...
-change beliefs and still need certainty
-reject biblical inerrancy and still need to be right
-become progressive and still split humanity into enlightened and ignorant
Take your deconstruction deeper than theology.
You can...
-change beliefs and still need certainty
-reject biblical inerrancy and still need to be right
-become progressive and still split humanity into enlightened and ignorant
Take your deconstruction deeper than theology.
September 11, 2026 at 8:57 PM
You can leave fundamentalism and still hold onto it psychologically.
You can...
-change beliefs and still need certainty
-reject biblical inerrancy and still need to be right
-become progressive and still split humanity into enlightened and ignorant
Take your deconstruction deeper than theology.
You can...
-change beliefs and still need certainty
-reject biblical inerrancy and still need to be right
-become progressive and still split humanity into enlightened and ignorant
Take your deconstruction deeper than theology.
I'm not sure it's exactly "lazy", but it's a lot of lazy thinking where they start with the conclusion of right-wing Christian Nationalism, find incoherent scripture to get close enough to justify it, then fall back on "inerrancy" to get around the incoherence.
September 10, 2026 at 5:00 AM
I'm not sure it's exactly "lazy", but it's a lot of lazy thinking where they start with the conclusion of right-wing Christian Nationalism, find incoherent scripture to get close enough to justify it, then fall back on "inerrancy" to get around the incoherence.
This is going to be good. 👇
And probably make waves. Also good.
And probably make waves. Also good.
September 8, 2026 at 10:30 PM
This is going to be good. 👇
And probably make waves. Also good.
And probably make waves. Also good.
cant believe i had inerrancy shoved down my throat my whole childhood and it was not only invented in my parent's lifetime, IT WAS NEVER INTENDED TO APPLY TO THE NKJV OR ANY MODERN TRANSLATION IM SO MAD
September 8, 2026 at 9:58 PM
cant believe i had inerrancy shoved down my throat my whole childhood and it was not only invented in my parent's lifetime, IT WAS NEVER INTENDED TO APPLY TO THE NKJV OR ANY MODERN TRANSLATION IM SO MAD
Not even Protestant per se but American evangelical “”””””biblical inerrancy””””” brain combined with naive liberal Xtian “Jesus was a communist” stuff that gets people into a ”original = authentic=good” mindset and then the Haredi with the gear are “authentic”
September 8, 2026 at 2:47 PM
Not even Protestant per se but American evangelical “”””””biblical inerrancy””””” brain combined with naive liberal Xtian “Jesus was a communist” stuff that gets people into a ”original = authentic=good” mindset and then the Haredi with the gear are “authentic”