But they were never lawful targets in the first place even if LOAC applied.
And LOAC doesn’t apply because there is no armed conflict.
Term for premeditated killing outside of armed conflict is murder.
TOM COTTON: They were sitting or standing on top of a capsized boat. They weren't floating helplessly in the water
But they were never lawful targets in the first place even if LOAC applied.
And LOAC doesn’t apply because there is no armed conflict.
Term for premeditated killing outside of armed conflict is murder.
The mere threat of such attacks may violate LOAC.
The mere threat of such attacks may violate LOAC.
Poor target discrimination is worthy of maximal criticism and can comprise a war crime if there is documented intent.
But it it not “genocide,” which is why genocide is not included in the ICC warrants for Likud
2) Fentanyl not aboard these boats.
3) He doesn't understand LOAC (or at least pretends not to.)
2) Fentanyl not aboard these boats.
3) He doesn't understand LOAC (or at least pretends not to.)
It's a kind of perfidy
It's a kind of perfidy
children of combatants are *civilians* irregardless of their connection to combatants
children of combatants are *civilians* irregardless of their connection to combatants
Understanding why these LOAC rules exist and impressing that upon clients—up to and including POTUS—ought to be a critical skill for executive branch lawyers.
Understanding why these LOAC rules exist and impressing that upon clients—up to and including POTUS—ought to be a critical skill for executive branch lawyers.
I will not argue LOAC with the ignorant on my lunchbreak
I will not argue LOAC with the ignorant on my lunchbreak
I will not argue LOAC with the ignorant on my lunchbreak
I will not argue LOAC with the ignorant on my lunchbreak
Well done, @crow.house.gov.
Well done, @crow.house.gov.
The location they attacked is where Reuters and the AP livestream.
From me and others (see byline/contribs)
www.nytimes.com/2025/08/26/w...
almost like words mean things
almost like words mean things