#Philosophy #PhilSky
philpapers.org/rec/RAAEIT
Semantics: v v developed by Potts/McCready/Gutzmann. Metasemantics taken seriously by Beaver/Stanley — who else?
🐦🐦 #philsky
Semantics: v v developed by Potts/McCready/Gutzmann. Metasemantics taken seriously by Beaver/Stanley — who else?
🐦🐦 #philsky
Good Explanations and the Causal Metasemantics of Inductive Concepts
Good Explanations and the Causal Metasemantics of Inductive Concepts
1 live in a democracy
2 figure out the metasemantics of social meaning
3 go backpacking a bunch
4 learn modicum of self-care
5 fall in love w/ someone who doesn't mind that I'm crazy sometimes
6 read a lot of books
7 see a lot of movies
8 have dog
9 learn Japanese
1 live in a democracy
2 figure out the metasemantics of social meaning
3 go backpacking a bunch
4 learn modicum of self-care
5 fall in love w/ someone who doesn't mind that I'm crazy sometimes
6 read a lot of books
7 see a lot of movies
8 have dog
9 learn Japanese
Me: [sinks into contemplation of metasemantics and articulate shutdowns]
Me: [sinks into contemplation of metasemantics and articulate shutdowns]
#WorkshopOnCrossroadsinthePoliticalPhilosophyofLanguage
#WorkshopOnCrossroadsinthePoliticalPhilosophyofLanguage
YD Kim
We factorize Kripke-style valuation as V = I o delta, where delta maps object-language formulas to syntactic distinctions and I maps such distinctions to possible-worlds truth-conditions. So modal evaluation is done over interpreted distinctions.
YD Kim
We factorize Kripke-style valuation as V = I o delta, where delta maps object-language formulas to syntactic distinctions and I maps such distinctions to possible-worlds truth-conditions. So modal evaluation is done over interpreted distinctions.
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
rsbakker.wordpress.com/2017/04/17/v...
rsbakker.wordpress.com/2017/04/17/v...