📢 Just under 2 weeks left to submit your work on causal inference & its many applications! Submit by Nov. 16th AoE.
Submission portal: openreview.net/challenge?re...
Submission portal: openreview.net/challenge?re...
Verifying your browser | OpenReview
openreview.net
November 3, 2026 at 3:41 PM
📢 Just under 2 weeks left to submit your work on causal inference & its many applications! Submit by Nov. 16th AoE.
Submission portal: openreview.net/challenge?re...
Submission portal: openreview.net/challenge?re...
We recently noticed a misconfiguration in our portal that led to decision comments being rendered invisible to authors. This has been corrected. You should now be able to see the decision comment for your submission on your OpenReview submission page. Apologies for the inconvenience.
November 3, 2026 at 5:50 PM
We recently noticed a misconfiguration in our portal that led to decision comments being rendered invisible to authors. This has been corrected. You should now be able to see the decision comment for your submission on your OpenReview submission page. Apologies for the inconvenience.
ま～たARRはシレ――っと一日早くOpenReviewの締切を設定する…
October 29, 2026 at 12:32 AM
ま～たARRはシレ――っと一日早くOpenReviewの締切を設定する…
#CVPR2027 author instructions are out: cvpr.thecvf.com/Conferences/...
No paper id in the pdf. Perhaps a direct consequence of the multiple (*sigh*) recent OpenReview leaks? This will avoid modifying the pdfs after submission in case a remap to new IDs is needed.
No paper id in the pdf. Perhaps a direct consequence of the multiple (*sigh*) recent OpenReview leaks? This will avoid modifying the pdfs after submission in case a remap to new IDs is needed.
October 27, 2026 at 10:16 AM
#CVPR2027 author instructions are out: cvpr.thecvf.com/Conferences/...
No paper id in the pdf. Perhaps a direct consequence of the multiple (*sigh*) recent OpenReview leaks? This will avoid modifying the pdfs after submission in case a remap to new IDs is needed.
No paper id in the pdf. Perhaps a direct consequence of the multiple (*sigh*) recent OpenReview leaks? This will avoid modifying the pdfs after submission in case a remap to new IDs is needed.
CDS Postdoc Julia Linhart and colleagues found a faster, diffusion-based way to match computer simulations, like models of brain activity, to real-world data.
Their method ran about 2.5 times faster than the previous approach.
Presented at #ICML2026.
openreview.net/pdf?id=cdhfo...
Their method ran about 2.5 times faster than the previous approach.
Presented at #ICML2026.
openreview.net/pdf?id=cdhfo...
Verifying your browser | OpenReview
Please complete the verification above.
openreview.net
October 28, 2026 at 8:25 PM
CDS Postdoc Julia Linhart and colleagues found a faster, diffusion-based way to match computer simulations, like models of brain activity, to real-world data.
Their method ran about 2.5 times faster than the previous approach.
Presented at #ICML2026.
openreview.net/pdf?id=cdhfo...
Their method ran about 2.5 times faster than the previous approach.
Presented at #ICML2026.
openreview.net/pdf?id=cdhfo...
本当にこれで、AIからのfeedbackなんてsubmission前にこっちで勝手に3000回は受けてるんで、OpenReview上でわざわざやる意味マジでない
Funny to see all AI reviewers are obsessed with the same minor equation typos to blame the paper and only human reviewers give "meaningful" feedback
October 24, 2026 at 3:01 AM
本当にこれで、AIからのfeedbackなんてsubmission前にこっちで勝手に3000回は受けてるんで、OpenReview上でわざわざやる意味マジでない
Por ahí va el modelo OpenReview (en parte).
October 23, 2026 at 9:21 AM
Por ahí va el modelo OpenReview (en parte).
Just read this article on a "new" literacy of students and teachers to statistics, data science, machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Thought of sharing it. Not my area tbc. Just read out of curiosity: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=SdzWuf7nXa
Thought of sharing it. Not my area tbc. Just read out of curiosity: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=SdzWuf7nXa
Verifying your browser | OpenReview
openreview.net
October 22, 2026 at 7:48 PM
Just read this article on a "new" literacy of students and teachers to statistics, data science, machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Thought of sharing it. Not my area tbc. Just read out of curiosity: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=SdzWuf7nXa
Thought of sharing it. Not my area tbc. Just read out of curiosity: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=SdzWuf7nXa
猫も杓子も緊急メンテに入ってる。入ってへんのはOpenReviewくんだけやぞ…
October 21, 2026 at 11:12 AM
猫も杓子も緊急メンテに入ってる。入ってへんのはOpenReviewくんだけやぞ…
SEAL: SocioEconomic Alignment in LLMs
🦭 How does LLM service quality vary across users’ socioeconomic statuses? We evaluate helpfulness, sycophancy, human likeness, emotion features and text complexity.
📍 NLP for Positive Impact
🗓️ 28 October 2026
📄 openreview.net/forum?id=3Yt...
🦭 How does LLM service quality vary across users’ socioeconomic statuses? We evaluate helpfulness, sycophancy, human likeness, emotion features and text complexity.
📍 NLP for Positive Impact
🗓️ 28 October 2026
📄 openreview.net/forum?id=3Yt...
Verifying your browser | OpenReview
openreview.net
October 20, 2026 at 8:10 AM
SEAL: SocioEconomic Alignment in LLMs
🦭 How does LLM service quality vary across users’ socioeconomic statuses? We evaluate helpfulness, sycophancy, human likeness, emotion features and text complexity.
📍 NLP for Positive Impact
🗓️ 28 October 2026
📄 openreview.net/forum?id=3Yt...
🦭 How does LLM service quality vary across users’ socioeconomic statuses? We evaluate helpfulness, sycophancy, human likeness, emotion features and text complexity.
📍 NLP for Positive Impact
🗓️ 28 October 2026
📄 openreview.net/forum?id=3Yt...
Can LLMs Model Incorrect Student Reasoning?
🧩 A reasoning taxonomy applied to math/science LLM traces reveals domain adaptation, learning-science alignment, and failures in solution recovery.
📍 Hall H
🎤 Yanick Zengaffinen
🗓️ 26 October 2026, 11:00–12:30
📄 openreview.net/forum?id=sQ4...
🧩 A reasoning taxonomy applied to math/science LLM traces reveals domain adaptation, learning-science alignment, and failures in solution recovery.
📍 Hall H
🎤 Yanick Zengaffinen
🗓️ 26 October 2026, 11:00–12:30
📄 openreview.net/forum?id=sQ4...
Verifying your browser | OpenReview
openreview.net
October 20, 2026 at 8:09 AM
Can LLMs Model Incorrect Student Reasoning?
🧩 A reasoning taxonomy applied to math/science LLM traces reveals domain adaptation, learning-science alignment, and failures in solution recovery.
📍 Hall H
🎤 Yanick Zengaffinen
🗓️ 26 October 2026, 11:00–12:30
📄 openreview.net/forum?id=sQ4...
🧩 A reasoning taxonomy applied to math/science LLM traces reveals domain adaptation, learning-science alignment, and failures in solution recovery.
📍 Hall H
🎤 Yanick Zengaffinen
🗓️ 26 October 2026, 11:00–12:30
📄 openreview.net/forum?id=sQ4...
👉 Check out the blog post on the ReproducibiliTea Blog: reproducibilitea.org/jc/2026/10/1... #postpublicationreview #peerreview #openreview #openresearch #researchculture #research #science #academia #conversation
Post-publication review as a digital colloquium
The central question of science is: how can we improve our scientific theories?
reproducibilitea.org
October 20, 2026 at 11:49 AM
👉 Check out the blog post on the ReproducibiliTea Blog: reproducibilitea.org/jc/2026/10/1... #postpublicationreview #peerreview #openreview #openresearch #researchculture #research #science #academia #conversation
I suspect it's a PCS issue. I would prefer if SIGCHI conferences switched to OpenReview, but at least CSCW was scared off by the security leaks of sacrosanct peer review info. PCS is reliable even if very limited in functionality.
October 19, 2026 at 4:02 AM
I suspect it's a PCS issue. I would prefer if SIGCHI conferences switched to OpenReview, but at least CSCW was scared off by the security leaks of sacrosanct peer review info. PCS is reliable even if very limited in functionality.
Want to know what's new for FAccT'27? Check out this blog post from our Program Chairs sharing updates and FAQs for authors and reviewers!
facct-blog.github.io/2026-10-15/p...
facct-blog.github.io/2026-10-15/p...
Preparing for FAccT 2027: Important updates for Authors and Reviewers
First, an important reminder: If you currently do not have an OpenReview account, please make sure to create one without delay. Authors without an institutional affiliation should sign up as soon as p...
facct-blog.github.io
October 19, 2026 at 12:32 PM
Want to know what's new for FAccT'27? Check out this blog post from our Program Chairs sharing updates and FAQs for authors and reviewers!
facct-blog.github.io/2026-10-15/p...
facct-blog.github.io/2026-10-15/p...
🗓️ 1 month left to submit to #CLeaR2027!
We're looking for anything causal: learning and reasoning, applications using novel methods, machine learning building on causal principles, causal discovery in large datasets... Call for papers ends 11/16 AoE
Submit to: openreview.net/group?id=ccl...
We're looking for anything causal: learning and reasoning, applications using novel methods, machine learning building on causal principles, causal discovery in large datasets... Call for papers ends 11/16 AoE
Submit to: openreview.net/group?id=ccl...
CLeaR 2027 Conference
Welcome to the OpenReview homepage for CLeaR 2027 Conference
openreview.net
October 16, 2026 at 1:57 PM
🗓️ 1 month left to submit to #CLeaR2027!
We're looking for anything causal: learning and reasoning, applications using novel methods, machine learning building on causal principles, causal discovery in large datasets... Call for papers ends 11/16 AoE
Submit to: openreview.net/group?id=ccl...
We're looking for anything causal: learning and reasoning, applications using novel methods, machine learning building on causal principles, causal discovery in large datasets... Call for papers ends 11/16 AoE
Submit to: openreview.net/group?id=ccl...
And an important reminder from the Program Chairs: if you currently do not have an OpenReview account, please make sure to create one without delay!
October 15, 2026 at 2:20 PM
And an important reminder from the Program Chairs: if you currently do not have an OpenReview account, please make sure to create one without delay!
Authors without an institutional affiliation should sign up as soon as possible, because profile verification may take a couple of weeks to process. For these authors, we recommend creating an OpenReview account by October 16, 2026. Please do not leave this until the submission deadline!
October 15, 2026 at 2:20 PM
Authors without an institutional affiliation should sign up as soon as possible, because profile verification may take a couple of weeks to process. For these authors, we recommend creating an OpenReview account by October 16, 2026. Please do not leave this until the submission deadline!
#til about #OpenReview;
"OpenReview aims to promote openness in scientific communication, particularly the peer review process, by providing a flexible cloud-based web interface and underlying database API ..."
https://openreview.net/about
This opening sentence is followed by a long list of […]
"OpenReview aims to promote openness in scientific communication, particularly the peer review process, by providing a flexible cloud-based web interface and underlying database API ..."
https://openreview.net/about
This opening sentence is followed by a long list of […]
Original post on mastodon.nzoss.nz
mastodon.nzoss.nz
October 14, 2026 at 3:18 PM
#til about #OpenReview;
"OpenReview aims to promote openness in scientific communication, particularly the peer review process, by providing a flexible cloud-based web interface and underlying database API ..."
https://openreview.net/about
This opening sentence is followed by a long list of […]
"OpenReview aims to promote openness in scientific communication, particularly the peer review process, by providing a flexible cloud-based web interface and underlying database API ..."
https://openreview.net/about
This opening sentence is followed by a long list of […]
📢 ARR Oct authors
At least one author must have an OpenReview account by the ddl. Others have 1 week to complete profiles. ARR cannot resolve account issues.
FAQ on lottery exemptions:
aclrollingreview.org/sustainable-...
Only EMNLP/AACL26 can be verified before indexing.
#ARR #NLProc
At least one author must have an OpenReview account by the ddl. Others have 1 week to complete profiles. ARR cannot resolve account issues.
FAQ on lottery exemptions:
aclrollingreview.org/sustainable-...
Only EMNLP/AACL26 can be verified before indexing.
#ARR #NLProc
ACL sustainable reviewing policy
Work in progress! ⚠️ This policy is new, and ARR is still working out the implementation details. We also receive a lot of questions. We will be posting any relevant clarifications and FAQ here and in...
aclrollingreview.org
October 13, 2026 at 2:56 PM
📢 ARR Oct authors
At least one author must have an OpenReview account by the ddl. Others have 1 week to complete profiles. ARR cannot resolve account issues.
FAQ on lottery exemptions:
aclrollingreview.org/sustainable-...
Only EMNLP/AACL26 can be verified before indexing.
#ARR #NLProc
At least one author must have an OpenReview account by the ddl. Others have 1 week to complete profiles. ARR cannot resolve account issues.
FAQ on lottery exemptions:
aclrollingreview.org/sustainable-...
Only EMNLP/AACL26 can be verified before indexing.
#ARR #NLProc
Ok, but "rogue behavior" = programmers ducking responsibility for their failure to build adequate constraints into models. This really is all just computer programs, statistical techniques, and predictive text generation.
openreview.net/pdf?id=Ul2K0...
openreview.net/pdf?id=Ul2K0...
Verifying your browser | OpenReview
Please complete the verification above.
openreview.net
October 11, 2026 at 9:57 AM
Ok, but "rogue behavior" = programmers ducking responsibility for their failure to build adequate constraints into models. This really is all just computer programs, statistical techniques, and predictive text generation.
openreview.net/pdf?id=Ul2K0...
openreview.net/pdf?id=Ul2K0...
Google scholar and personal website mainly, sometimes openreview!
October 9, 2026 at 8:11 PM
Google scholar and personal website mainly, sometimes openreview!
In our evaluations, the system detected more errors than the other review systems we tested, including on papers withdrawn because of real mistakes.
Verifying your browser | OpenReview
openreview.net
October 9, 2026 at 12:59 PM
In our evaluations, the system detected more errors than the other review systems we tested, including on papers withdrawn because of real mistakes.
Our goal is to give reviewers useful support in checking research, with human expertise and judgment at the center.
Open Review: openreview.net/forum?id=7iX...
Open Review: openreview.net/forum?id=7iX...
Verifying your browser | OpenReview
openreview.net
October 9, 2026 at 1:00 PM
Our goal is to give reviewers useful support in checking research, with human expertise and judgment at the center.
Open Review: openreview.net/forum?id=7iX...
Open Review: openreview.net/forum?id=7iX...
We also introduce Multi-Layered Review, an AI review system inspired by the 3-Pass Approach to reading papers. It outlines the main ideas, then examines the details and potential weaknesses, finally brings observations together into a review. The simple idea: understand the paper before judging it.
Verifying your browser | OpenReview
openreview.net
October 9, 2026 at 12:59 PM
We also introduce Multi-Layered Review, an AI review system inspired by the 3-Pass Approach to reading papers. It outlines the main ideas, then examines the details and potential weaknesses, finally brings observations together into a review. The simple idea: understand the paper before judging it.
We build an automated pipeline that deliberately introduces contradictions into papers by adding statements that conflict with information elsewhere in the manuscript. These planted errors give us clear targets for testing whether AI reviewers can spot and explain what is wrong.
Verifying your browser | OpenReview
openreview.net
October 9, 2026 at 12:57 PM
We build an automated pipeline that deliberately introduces contradictions into papers by adding statements that conflict with information elsewhere in the manuscript. These planted errors give us clear targets for testing whether AI reviewers can spot and explain what is wrong.