Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
専用のサイトもある。
www.reqol.org.uk/p/overview.h...
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
専用のサイトもある。
www.reqol.org.uk/p/overview.h...
Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties† | The British Journal of Psychiatry | Cambridge Core
Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties† - Volume 212 Issue 1
www.cambridge.org
September 18, 2025 at 9:31 AM
Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
専用のサイトもある。
www.reqol.org.uk/p/overview.h...
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
専用のサイトもある。
www.reqol.org.uk/p/overview.h...
Does the use of the ‘ReQol’ questionnaire measure by Mental Health services work for #Neurodivergent people? Esp #AuDHD with trauma? Was neurodivergence taken into account in its inception & construction? (Unlike PHQ9 & GAD7 which I feel fail us)
October 24, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Does the use of the ‘ReQol’ questionnaire measure by Mental Health services work for #Neurodivergent people? Esp #AuDHD with trauma? Was neurodivergence taken into account in its inception & construction? (Unlike PHQ9 & GAD7 which I feel fail us)
Hi Jon,
I don't know loads about the ReQol, but it's used where I work.
From the little I know, it was developed more around mental health.
There was reference to Sheffield uni wanting to develop a version for autistics and people with intellectual disabilities, but I'm not sure if they ever did.
I don't know loads about the ReQol, but it's used where I work.
From the little I know, it was developed more around mental health.
There was reference to Sheffield uni wanting to develop a version for autistics and people with intellectual disabilities, but I'm not sure if they ever did.
October 24, 2025 at 2:28 PM
Hi Jon,
I don't know loads about the ReQol, but it's used where I work.
From the little I know, it was developed more around mental health.
There was reference to Sheffield uni wanting to develop a version for autistics and people with intellectual disabilities, but I'm not sure if they ever did.
I don't know loads about the ReQol, but it's used where I work.
From the little I know, it was developed more around mental health.
There was reference to Sheffield uni wanting to develop a version for autistics and people with intellectual disabilities, but I'm not sure if they ever did.
Fun fun fun - chronic illness clinic sent me the check in questionnaire again.
EQ5D5L - 0.093 (Score between -0.400 and 1.000. Higher is better.)
MSK - 16 (Score between 0 and 56. Higher is better.)
ReQoL-10 - 21.00 (Score between 0.00 and 40.00. Higher is better.)
It's fine... this is all […]
EQ5D5L - 0.093 (Score between -0.400 and 1.000. Higher is better.)
MSK - 16 (Score between 0 and 56. Higher is better.)
ReQoL-10 - 21.00 (Score between 0.00 and 40.00. Higher is better.)
It's fine... this is all […]
Original post on toot.wales
toot.wales
October 27, 2025 at 9:43 AM
Fun fun fun - chronic illness clinic sent me the check in questionnaire again.
EQ5D5L - 0.093 (Score between -0.400 and 1.000. Higher is better.)
MSK - 16 (Score between 0 and 56. Higher is better.)
ReQoL-10 - 21.00 (Score between 0.00 and 40.00. Higher is better.)
It's fine... this is all […]
EQ5D5L - 0.093 (Score between -0.400 and 1.000. Higher is better.)
MSK - 16 (Score between 0 and 56. Higher is better.)
ReQoL-10 - 21.00 (Score between 0.00 and 40.00. Higher is better.)
It's fine... this is all […]
Don’t forget the ReQol
In honour of spooky month, share a 4 word horror story that only someone in your profession would understand.
rm -rf ~/
rm -rf ~/
"The chancellor approved it"
October 12, 2025 at 9:46 AM
Don’t forget the ReQol
Service user perspective on #patientreported outcomes:
"the items should be relevant and meaningful, unambiguous, easy to answer particularly when distressed, do not cause further upset, and be non-judgemental."
#reqol #qol #isoqol #qlr #openaccess
"the items should be relevant and meaningful, unambiguous, easy to answer particularly when distressed, do not cause further upset, and be non-judgemental."
#reqol #qol #isoqol #qlr #openaccess
November 17, 2024 at 11:58 AM
Service user perspective on #patientreported outcomes:
"the items should be relevant and meaningful, unambiguous, easy to answer particularly when distressed, do not cause further upset, and be non-judgemental."
#reqol #qol #isoqol #qlr #openaccess
"the items should be relevant and meaningful, unambiguous, easy to answer particularly when distressed, do not cause further upset, and be non-judgemental."
#reqol #qol #isoqol #qlr #openaccess
Under licenceだから使用料もかかるのかな。
Psychometric properties of Japanese version of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL)
bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
Psychometric properties of Japanese version of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL)
bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
Psychometric properties of Japanese version of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) - BMC Psychiatry
Purpose This study aims to examine the psychometric properties of the Recovering Quality of Life– Japanese version (ReQoL-J) for use in the community setting. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted among service users of community mental health service facilities. A series of confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) was performed. After the best-fitting model was identified, omega indices, and intraclass correlation (ICC) were calculated to evaluate dimensionality and reliability. The correlation coefficients between the ReQoL-J scores and the other scales were calculated for testing construct validity. We also estimated the correlation coefficients between the ReQoL-J-10 and − 20. Results A total of 395 service users from 23 facilities in Japan participated in this study. Of these, 66 responded to the test-retest reliability. The bifactor model showed the best fit to the data: χ2/df = 1.74, CFI = 0.993, RMSEA = 0.031, and SRMR = 0.038. ECV and OmegaH indicated unidimensionality. ICC for the Re-QoL-J-10 and − 20 were 0.700 and 0.766, respectively. The ReQoL-J-10 showed a high correlation with the ReQoL-J-20 (r =.95, p <.001). The EQ-5D-5 L, a new brief scale for subjective personal agency (SPA-5), well-being and the quality of life scale (QLS) scores were positively correlated with the ReQoL-J score. On the other hand, the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the WHODAS scores were negatively correlated with the ReQoL-J score. Conclusion Factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the ReQoL-J were confirmed. The ReQoL-J is a promising tool as a patient-reported outcome measure in mental health services for the Japanese community setting.
bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com
September 30, 2025 at 3:46 AM
Under licenceだから使用料もかかるのかな。
Psychometric properties of Japanese version of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL)
bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
Psychometric properties of Japanese version of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL)
bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
I will let you know I am under the Kent and Medway lot and they even sent a ReQoL 10 out for me to fill in so I am guessing they are assuming I am in recovery
September 24, 2023 at 4:42 PM
I will let you know I am under the Kent and Medway lot and they even sent a ReQoL 10 out for me to fill in so I am guessing they are assuming I am in recovery
#FaceValidity in Instrument Development pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29675691/
The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL) - PubMed
This research has underlined the importance of service users' views on the acceptability and validity of items for use in developing a new measure. Whether or not service users favoured an item was…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
February 25, 2026 at 6:00 AM
#FaceValidity in Instrument Development pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29675691/