Reinaldo Azevedo
VÍDEO - Nikolas ataca a esquerda até por primo traficante. E a grana enviada para cidade do tio.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSeO...
VÍDEO - Nikolas ataca a esquerda até por primo traficante. E a grana enviada para cidade do tio.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSeO...
Reinaldo – Nikolas ataca a esquerda até por primo traficante. E a grana enviada para cidade do tio
YouTube video by Rádio BandNews FM
www.youtube.com
June 3, 2025 at 4:24 AM
Reinaldo Azevedo
VÍDEO - Nikolas ataca a esquerda até por primo traficante. E a grana enviada para cidade do tio.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSeO...
VÍDEO - Nikolas ataca a esquerda até por primo traficante. E a grana enviada para cidade do tio.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSeO...
RSEO chapter of the Belfast Agreement invoked are not clear enough. However:
a) the rights in the RSEO chapter are not too dissimilar from the actionable rights of many international rights documents, including the ECHR; and
b) this conclusion is the result of a misdirection by the court. /2
a) the rights in the RSEO chapter are not too dissimilar from the actionable rights of many international rights documents, including the ECHR; and
b) this conclusion is the result of a misdirection by the court. /2
May 7, 2026 at 3:40 PM
RSEO chapter of the Belfast Agreement invoked are not clear enough. However:
a) the rights in the RSEO chapter are not too dissimilar from the actionable rights of many international rights documents, including the ECHR; and
b) this conclusion is the result of a misdirection by the court. /2
a) the rights in the RSEO chapter are not too dissimilar from the actionable rights of many international rights documents, including the ECHR; and
b) this conclusion is the result of a misdirection by the court. /2
Colin notes that the bullet points in RSEO look like they might be directly effective, but the broader paragraphs in RSEO are not to be directly effective. Explains the two bespoke obligations in Art 2: specific alignment with relevant equality directives in Annex 1, AND no diminution re RSEO. 8/
June 10, 2026 at 10:49 AM
Colin notes that the bullet points in RSEO look like they might be directly effective, but the broader paragraphs in RSEO are not to be directly effective. Explains the two bespoke obligations in Art 2: specific alignment with relevant equality directives in Annex 1, AND no diminution re RSEO. 8/
Colin notes that the further issue with the UKSC's judgment in that it requires RSEO to be underpinned by EU law, but declares RSEO to be all about sectarian conflict, at which point very little EU law will ever underpin it! Colin calls this obiter - but it has huge impacts obviously. 19/
June 10, 2026 at 11:07 AM
Colin notes that the further issue with the UKSC's judgment in that it requires RSEO to be underpinned by EU law, but declares RSEO to be all about sectarian conflict, at which point very little EU law will ever underpin it! Colin calls this obiter - but it has huge impacts obviously. 19/
It: [does that - dying]
E-mail: hey, heres a message from The HPC - including that RSEO against your landlord
It: >:3c!
E-mail: hey, heres a message from The HPC - including that RSEO against your landlord
It: >:3c!
Went out to get some stuff today
Got home, got undressed, them packaged some stuff to mail off...
...
...
...and then realized that it would need to redress to go to the postal office
ITS POOR LEGS...
Got home, got undressed, them packaged some stuff to mail off...
...
...
...and then realized that it would need to redress to go to the postal office
ITS POOR LEGS...
September 22, 2026 at 12:55 PM
It: [does that - dying]
E-mail: hey, heres a message from The HPC - including that RSEO against your landlord
It: >:3c!
E-mail: hey, heres a message from The HPC - including that RSEO against your landlord
It: >:3c!
It doesn't required the RSEO to be directly effective but a determination of diminution *of anything set out in the RSEO* will always require a legal determination of the terms in it? Saying this isn't what was intended is a complaint to raise with the UK government circa 2020, not now. 28/
June 10, 2026 at 11:22 AM
It doesn't required the RSEO to be directly effective but a determination of diminution *of anything set out in the RSEO* will always require a legal determination of the terms in it? Saying this isn't what was intended is a complaint to raise with the UK government circa 2020, not now. 28/
Ultimately, it is the Court's reasoning that undermines the text and purpose of art 2(1) of the WF, creating an artificial division between RSEO rights that might be capable of direct effect and those which can't. I wonder if this might put the UK in violation of the WA. /end
May 7, 2026 at 3:40 PM
Ultimately, it is the Court's reasoning that undermines the text and purpose of art 2(1) of the WF, creating an artificial division between RSEO rights that might be capable of direct effect and those which can't. I wonder if this might put the UK in violation of the WA. /end
Thanks for giving me a great laugh this morning. I particularly enjoyed that the drafters of the 1998 Agreement wouldn't have contemplated the fall of the Berlin Wall, and ignoring elements like para 4 RSEO. Maybe a bit more reflection needed?
November 18, 2024 at 9:45 AM
Thanks for giving me a great laugh this morning. I particularly enjoyed that the drafters of the 1998 Agreement wouldn't have contemplated the fall of the Berlin Wall, and ignoring elements like para 4 RSEO. Maybe a bit more reflection needed?
the *contents* of the RSEO rights in question must be clear and precise for s 2(1) to have direct effect: 'It is only in this way that the obligation not to diminish
rights, safeguards or equality of opportunity acquires any content' [at 116].
This is artificial and, ultimately, false. /7
rights, safeguards or equality of opportunity acquires any content' [at 116].
This is artificial and, ultimately, false. /7
May 7, 2026 at 3:40 PM
the *contents* of the RSEO rights in question must be clear and precise for s 2(1) to have direct effect: 'It is only in this way that the obligation not to diminish
rights, safeguards or equality of opportunity acquires any content' [at 116].
This is artificial and, ultimately, false. /7
rights, safeguards or equality of opportunity acquires any content' [at 116].
This is artificial and, ultimately, false. /7
As some of the parties had submitted, in fact, the language of s2(1) of the WF is *evidently* clear enough to satisfy the Demirel test: the obligation on the UK is to 'ensure that no diminution of RSEO rights' etc 'results from Brexit. The obligation presupposes the existence of those rights! /3
May 7, 2026 at 3:40 PM
As some of the parties had submitted, in fact, the language of s2(1) of the WF is *evidently* clear enough to satisfy the Demirel test: the obligation on the UK is to 'ensure that no diminution of RSEO rights' etc 'results from Brexit. The obligation presupposes the existence of those rights! /3
Professor Dickson here notes that the challenge in Dillon failed largely because the 'rights' being asked for did not exist in EU law; and notes that BGFA RSEO should not be overinterpreted for legal purposes. With respect, think that's missing the point - that's what Art 2 requires? 27/
June 10, 2026 at 11:22 AM
Professor Dickson here notes that the challenge in Dillon failed largely because the 'rights' being asked for did not exist in EU law; and notes that BGFA RSEO should not be overinterpreted for legal purposes. With respect, think that's missing the point - that's what Art 2 requires? 27/
provision of the RSEO chapter of the Belfast Agreement).
The Supreme Court instead pulls out of thin air a test according to which it is not enough that there is a clear and precise obligation of result (no diminution pre and post-brexit) to satisfy the Demirel test. What is needed is also that /6
The Supreme Court instead pulls out of thin air a test according to which it is not enough that there is a clear and precise obligation of result (no diminution pre and post-brexit) to satisfy the Demirel test. What is needed is also that /6
May 7, 2026 at 3:40 PM
provision of the RSEO chapter of the Belfast Agreement).
The Supreme Court instead pulls out of thin air a test according to which it is not enough that there is a clear and precise obligation of result (no diminution pre and post-brexit) to satisfy the Demirel test. What is needed is also that /6
The Supreme Court instead pulls out of thin air a test according to which it is not enough that there is a clear and precise obligation of result (no diminution pre and post-brexit) to satisfy the Demirel test. What is needed is also that /6
Trump just f*cked America over...
YouTube video by Adam Mockler
www.youtube.com
April 19, 2026 at 3:25 AM
Criticizes UKSC decision that the VRD did not apply in Dillon. Lord Dodds comes in at this point - what would a diminution now look like, assuming there's direct effect? Eleni cites the UKSC three-part test, which is basically okay. UKSC gets to decide what's in RSEO... 13/
June 10, 2026 at 11:00 AM
Criticizes UKSC decision that the VRD did not apply in Dillon. Lord Dodds comes in at this point - what would a diminution now look like, assuming there's direct effect? Eleni cites the UKSC three-part test, which is basically okay. UKSC gets to decide what's in RSEO... 13/
Toa Sasaki and Mizuho Hasegawa Shine at RSEO PDX 2026 Skateboarding Competition in Portland#USA#Portland#Monster_Energy#Toa_Sasaki#Mizuho_Hasegawa
Toa Sasaki and Mizuho Hasegawa Shine at RSEO PDX 2026 Skateboarding Competition in Portland
Toa Sasaki and Mizuho Hasegawa take top honors at the exciting RSEO PDX 2026 skateboard competition, showcasing incredible talent.
third-news.com
August 17, 2026 at 9:06 PM
Toa Sasaki and Mizuho Hasegawa Shine at RSEO PDX 2026 Skateboarding Competition in Portland#USA#Portland#Monster_Energy#Toa_Sasaki#Mizuho_Hasegawa
But then the question becomes, is how do we determine if there is a diminution of a right underpinned by EU law that would not have happened but for Brexit? Eleni gives a good hypothetical. Easier with the Annex 1 Directives. Real limits to what is in RSEO per UKSC. 14/
June 10, 2026 at 11:00 AM
But then the question becomes, is how do we determine if there is a diminution of a right underpinned by EU law that would not have happened but for Brexit? Eleni gives a good hypothetical. Easier with the Annex 1 Directives. Real limits to what is in RSEO per UKSC. 14/
Baroness Foster has a new question that they can't prepare for. Does it matter that the RSEO is in the multi-party agreement, and not in the international treaty part of the BGFA? (Eg, a political agreement is now being treated as legal text.) 26/
June 10, 2026 at 11:18 AM
Baroness Foster has a new question that they can't prepare for. Does it matter that the RSEO is in the multi-party agreement, and not in the international treaty part of the BGFA? (Eg, a political agreement is now being treated as legal text.) 26/
Committee asks how helpful Dillon is, given how vague it leaves whether specific RSEO elements have direct effect in UKSC's views. Sam says this is normal when we have new law. I respectfully disagree, because there is nothing new about direct effect bar the 'doubling' the UKSC demands. 14/
June 24, 2026 at 12:17 PM
Committee asks how helpful Dillon is, given how vague it leaves whether specific RSEO elements have direct effect in UKSC's views. Sam says this is normal when we have new law. I respectfully disagree, because there is nothing new about direct effect bar the 'doubling' the UKSC demands. 14/
Chris indicates that Dillon may have restricted operation of Art 2. Depends on how eg all other elements of the RSEO are interpreted by what will have to be further court cases. Sam notes that 'civil rights' in RSEO were declared as not directly effective but that's all we know. 17/
June 24, 2026 at 12:25 PM
Chris indicates that Dillon may have restricted operation of Art 2. Depends on how eg all other elements of the RSEO are interpreted by what will have to be further court cases. Sam notes that 'civil rights' in RSEO were declared as not directly effective but that's all we know. 17/
From the SEO community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the SEO community
www.reddit.com
August 15, 2026 at 6:02 PM