#scipublishing
Fantastic ideas for what scientific publishing (and reading!) would look like if it were designed to modern standards.

"User-friendly dashboards and gamification are not optional."

Really inspiring, including to those of us working on this @acochran12733.bsky.social

#scienceUX #scipublishing
February 28, 2025 at 7:18 AM
The APC cap policy is flashy as it can be argued that it seeks to get more bang for tax-payers dollars. However, there is no indication that neither the problem nor the consequences of such policy have been assessed well. #SciPublishing #academicsky
'And according to @eschares.bsky.social, data suggest that APCs bear almost no relation to publishing expenses. “So that tells me that APCs are not set on really what it costs to produce an article there,” he said. “It’s more prestige.”'

Undark piece on who should pay for scientific publishing.
In Scientific Publishing, Who Should Foot the Bill?
Publishers often charge authors to publish their publicly-funded research. Will a federal crackdown make a difference?
undark.org
January 7, 2026 at 12:52 PM
The PDF vs. HTML debate rages on for scientific papers. Many argue PDF remains king for preserving the author's original layout and print quality. It ensures the exact visual representation intended by researchers. #SciPublishing 4/6
December 7, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Esse especial inteiro da Nature sobre o futuro das publicações tem muita coisa boa <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/specials/scipublishing/index.html" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">http://www.nature.com/news/specials/scipublishing/index.html
Specials : Nature
www.nature.com
March 27, 2013 at 6:34 PM
The central tension remains: how to uphold open access principles while safeguarding research quality and reliability. arXiv's policy is a step, but the community seeks sustainable solutions for the future of scientific publishing. #SciPublishing 7/7
November 2, 2025 at 11:00 AM